Rib Remodeling Without Rib Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Andre Milani-Reis, Maria Meritxell Roca Mora, Pedro Bicudo Bregion, Luiz Fábio Silva Ribeiro, Pedro Henrique Meis, Iqbal Farhan Sayudo, Leonardo Kreutz-Rodrigues, Cesar Milani-Reis, Samyd S Bustos, Raúl Martín Manzaneda Cipriani, Mauricio Viaro, Lucas Kreutz-Rodrigues
{"title":"Rib Remodeling Without Rib Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Andre Milani-Reis, Maria Meritxell Roca Mora, Pedro Bicudo Bregion, Luiz Fábio Silva Ribeiro, Pedro Henrique Meis, Iqbal Farhan Sayudo, Leonardo Kreutz-Rodrigues, Cesar Milani-Reis, Samyd S Bustos, Raúl Martín Manzaneda Cipriani, Mauricio Viaro, Lucas Kreutz-Rodrigues","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-05240-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Interest in body contouring has led to developing techniques for waistline reduction. Rib remodeling is one such method. Traditional rib resection is invasive, limiting its cosmetic use. This review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel rib remodeling technique that avoids rib removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase was performed up to August 2024. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, waistline reduction, pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection, skin burns, and asymmetry. The Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation was used for data analysis, and statistical evaluations were conducted using R version 4.1.2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies with 318 patients were included, predominantly women (98.1%), with an average age of 32.7 years and BMI of 22.4 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The pooled analysis showed a satisfaction rate of 94.89 per 100 (95% CI 94.89-99.15); a significant reduction in waistline from preoperative to 3 months postoperative (MD - 8.59 cm; 95% CI - 10.27 to - 6.92; p < 0.01); pneumothorax and hemothorax rates were 0.00 per 100 (95% CI 0.00-0.66); infection prevalence was 0.00 per 100 (95% CI 0.00-1.18); skin burns prevalence was 0.57 per 100 (95% CI 0.00-3.91); and asymmetry prevalence was 1.85 per 100 (95% CI 0.25-4.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rib remodeling without resection effectively reduces the waistline, achieving high patient satisfaction and minimal serious complications.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence ii: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-05240-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Interest in body contouring has led to developing techniques for waistline reduction. Rib remodeling is one such method. Traditional rib resection is invasive, limiting its cosmetic use. This review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel rib remodeling technique that avoids rib removal.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Embase was performed up to August 2024. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, waistline reduction, pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection, skin burns, and asymmetry. The Freeman-Tukey Double Arcsine Transformation was used for data analysis, and statistical evaluations were conducted using R version 4.1.2.

Results: Four studies with 318 patients were included, predominantly women (98.1%), with an average age of 32.7 years and BMI of 22.4 kg/m2. The pooled analysis showed a satisfaction rate of 94.89 per 100 (95% CI 94.89-99.15); a significant reduction in waistline from preoperative to 3 months postoperative (MD - 8.59 cm; 95% CI - 10.27 to - 6.92; p < 0.01); pneumothorax and hemothorax rates were 0.00 per 100 (95% CI 0.00-0.66); infection prevalence was 0.00 per 100 (95% CI 0.00-1.18); skin burns prevalence was 0.57 per 100 (95% CI 0.00-3.91); and asymmetry prevalence was 1.85 per 100 (95% CI 0.25-4.41).

Conclusion: Rib remodeling without resection effectively reduces the waistline, achieving high patient satisfaction and minimal serious complications.

Level of evidence ii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

不切除肋骨的肋骨重塑:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:对身体轮廓的兴趣导致了腰围减少技术的发展。肋骨重塑就是其中一种方法。传统的肋骨切除术是侵入性的,限制了其美容用途。本综述和荟萃分析评估了一种避免肋骨切除的新型肋骨重塑技术的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Cochrane Central和Embase数据库,检索截止到2024年8月。结果包括患者满意度、腰围减少、气胸、血胸、感染、皮肤烧伤和不对称。采用Freeman-Tukey双反正弦变换进行数据分析,采用R 4.1.2版本进行统计评价。结果:纳入4项研究,共318例患者,以女性为主(98.1%),平均年龄32.7岁,BMI 22.4 kg/m2。合并分析显示满意度为94.89 / 100 (95% CI 94.89-99.15);术前至术后3个月腰围显著减少(MD - 8.59 cm; 95% CI - 10.27 ~ - 6.92; p < 0.01);气胸和血胸发生率为0.00 / 100 (95% CI 0.00-0.66);感染率为0.00 / 100 (95% CI 0.00-1.18);皮肤烧伤患病率为0.57 / 100 (95% CI 0.00-3.91);不对称患病率为1.85 / 100 (95% CI 0.25-4.41)。结论:不切除肋骨重塑能有效缩小腰线,患者满意度高,严重并发症少。证据等级ii:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者说明www.springer.com/00266。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信