Agronomic performance and nitrogen management of continuous rice systems following a year-long fallow

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Zhenglin Zhang, Daniel C. Olk, Luis A. Espino, Valentina Roel-Rezk, Bruce A. Linquist
{"title":"Agronomic performance and nitrogen management of continuous rice systems following a year-long fallow","authors":"Zhenglin Zhang,&nbsp;Daniel C. Olk,&nbsp;Luis A. Espino,&nbsp;Valentina Roel-Rezk,&nbsp;Bruce A. Linquist","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Erratic precipitation events, including winter droughts and spring rains, are increasing in California, challenging the feasibility of continuous rice (CR) (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L.) mono-cropping and increasing fallows. Exposure of CR soils to extended aerobic periods increases soil nitrogen (N) availability, but region-specific agronomic guidelines have yet to be developed. Yield response to N fertilization and disease severity were evaluated in a 3-year field study for two treatments—CR and fallow rice (FR—rice following a year-long fallow). Maximum observed yields did not differ between treatments, averaging 14.0 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2021, 12.6 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2022, and 9.6 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2023. Based on quadratic regressions of yield response to N, the agronomic optimum nitrogen rate was higher for CR in all years. Where no fertilizer N was applied, FR yielded higher than CR, averaging a difference of 2.9 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>. The yield differences at 0 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> can be attributed to soil N availability, where FR averaged 31.6 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> more N uptake than CR at maturity. Fertilizer recovery efficiency (FNRE) did not differ between treatments and averaged 59.8%. Stem rot, caused by <i>Sclerotium oryza</i>e, was more severe in CR than in FR, having averaged severity indexes of 3.7 and 3.1, respectively. Based on differences in soil N uptake and FNRE, the N rate can be reduced by approximately 50 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> for fields following a fallow compared to CR fields, allowing growers to maintain yields with lower inputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70182","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70182","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Erratic precipitation events, including winter droughts and spring rains, are increasing in California, challenging the feasibility of continuous rice (CR) (Oryza sativa L.) mono-cropping and increasing fallows. Exposure of CR soils to extended aerobic periods increases soil nitrogen (N) availability, but region-specific agronomic guidelines have yet to be developed. Yield response to N fertilization and disease severity were evaluated in a 3-year field study for two treatments—CR and fallow rice (FR—rice following a year-long fallow). Maximum observed yields did not differ between treatments, averaging 14.0 Mg ha−1 in 2021, 12.6 Mg ha−1 in 2022, and 9.6 Mg ha−1 in 2023. Based on quadratic regressions of yield response to N, the agronomic optimum nitrogen rate was higher for CR in all years. Where no fertilizer N was applied, FR yielded higher than CR, averaging a difference of 2.9 Mg ha−1. The yield differences at 0 kg N ha−1 can be attributed to soil N availability, where FR averaged 31.6 kg N ha−1 more N uptake than CR at maturity. Fertilizer recovery efficiency (FNRE) did not differ between treatments and averaged 59.8%. Stem rot, caused by Sclerotium oryzae, was more severe in CR than in FR, having averaged severity indexes of 3.7 and 3.1, respectively. Based on differences in soil N uptake and FNRE, the N rate can be reduced by approximately 50 kg N ha−1 for fields following a fallow compared to CR fields, allowing growers to maintain yields with lower inputs.

Abstract Image

休耕一年后水稻连作系统的农艺性能和氮管理
在加州,包括冬季干旱和春季降雨在内的不稳定降水事件正在增加,这对水稻单作和休耕的可行性提出了挑战。延长CR土壤的好氧期可增加土壤氮(N)的有效性,但区域特异性农艺指南尚未制定。在一项为期3年的田间研究中,对两种处理- cr和休耕水稻(休耕一年后的fr -水稻)进行了产量响应和病害严重程度的评估。观察到的最大产量在不同处理之间没有差异,2021年平均为14.0 Mg ha - 1, 2022年为12.6 Mg ha - 1, 2023年为9.6 Mg ha - 1。基于产量对氮素响应的二次回归分析,各年份CR的最适施氮量均较高。在不施氮肥的情况下,FR产量高于CR,平均差异为2.9 Mg ha−1。在0 kg N ha - 1条件下的产量差异可归因于土壤氮素有效性,成熟期FR平均比CR多吸收31.6 kg N ha - 1的氮素。肥料回收率(FNRE)各处理间无显著差异,平均为59.8%。水稻菌核菌引起的茎腐病在CR组的严重程度高于FR组,平均严重指数分别为3.7和3.1。基于土壤氮素吸收和FNRE的差异,与CR田相比,休耕后田地的氮素施用量可减少约50 kg N ha - 1,使种植者能够以较低的投入保持产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信