Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Bolivia: Simulation-Based Assessment of Control Strategies and Vaccination Requirements

IF 3 2区 农林科学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Nicolas C. Cardenas, Diego Viali dos Santos, Daniel Magalhães Lima, Hernán Oliver Daza Gutierrez, Daniel Rodney Gareca Vaca, Gustavo Machado
{"title":"Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Bolivia: Simulation-Based Assessment of Control Strategies and Vaccination Requirements","authors":"Nicolas C. Cardenas,&nbsp;Diego Viali dos Santos,&nbsp;Daniel Magalhães Lima,&nbsp;Hernán Oliver Daza Gutierrez,&nbsp;Daniel Rodney Gareca Vaca,&nbsp;Gustavo Machado","doi":"10.1155/tbed/9055612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Examining the dissemination dynamics of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is critical for revising national response plans. We developed a stochastic susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) metapopulation model to simulate FMD outbreaks in Bolivia and explore how the national response plan impacts the dissemination among all susceptible species. We explored variations in the control strategies, mapped high-risk areas, and estimated the number of vaccinated animals during the reactive ring vaccination. Initial outbreaks ranged from 1 to 357 infected farms, with control measures implemented for up to 100 days, including control zones, a 30-day movement ban, depopulation, and ring vaccination. Combining vaccination (50–90 farms/day) and depopulation (1–2 farms/day) controlled 60.3% of outbreaks, while similar vaccination but higher depopulation rates (3–5 farms/day) controlled 62.9% and eliminated outbreaks 9 days faster. Utilizing depopulation alone controlled 56.76% of outbreaks, but had a significantly longer median duration of 63 days. Combining vaccination (25–45 farms/day) and depopulation (6–7 farms/day) was the most effective approach, eliminating all outbreaks within a median of 3 days (with a maximum of 79 days). Vaccination alone controlled only 0.6% of outbreaks and had a median duration of 98 days. Ultimately, results showed that the most effective strategy involved ring vaccination combined with depopulation, requiring a median of 925,338 animals to be vaccinated. Outbreaks were most frequent in high-density farming areas, such as Potosí, Cochabamba, and La Paz. Our results suggest that emergency ring vaccination alone cannot eliminate FMD if reintroduced in Bolivia, and combining depopulation with vaccination significantly shortens the outbreak duration. These findings provide valuable insights to inform Bolivia’s national FMD response plan, including vaccine requirements and the role of depopulation in controlling outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/9055612","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/9055612","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining the dissemination dynamics of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is critical for revising national response plans. We developed a stochastic susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered (SEIR) metapopulation model to simulate FMD outbreaks in Bolivia and explore how the national response plan impacts the dissemination among all susceptible species. We explored variations in the control strategies, mapped high-risk areas, and estimated the number of vaccinated animals during the reactive ring vaccination. Initial outbreaks ranged from 1 to 357 infected farms, with control measures implemented for up to 100 days, including control zones, a 30-day movement ban, depopulation, and ring vaccination. Combining vaccination (50–90 farms/day) and depopulation (1–2 farms/day) controlled 60.3% of outbreaks, while similar vaccination but higher depopulation rates (3–5 farms/day) controlled 62.9% and eliminated outbreaks 9 days faster. Utilizing depopulation alone controlled 56.76% of outbreaks, but had a significantly longer median duration of 63 days. Combining vaccination (25–45 farms/day) and depopulation (6–7 farms/day) was the most effective approach, eliminating all outbreaks within a median of 3 days (with a maximum of 79 days). Vaccination alone controlled only 0.6% of outbreaks and had a median duration of 98 days. Ultimately, results showed that the most effective strategy involved ring vaccination combined with depopulation, requiring a median of 925,338 animals to be vaccinated. Outbreaks were most frequent in high-density farming areas, such as Potosí, Cochabamba, and La Paz. Our results suggest that emergency ring vaccination alone cannot eliminate FMD if reintroduced in Bolivia, and combining depopulation with vaccination significantly shortens the outbreak duration. These findings provide valuable insights to inform Bolivia’s national FMD response plan, including vaccine requirements and the role of depopulation in controlling outbreaks.

Abstract Image

玻利维亚的口蹄疫:基于模拟的控制战略和疫苗接种要求评估
审查口蹄疫的传播动态对于修订国家应对计划至关重要。我们建立了一个随机易感-暴露-感染-恢复(SEIR)元种群模型来模拟玻利维亚的口蹄疫暴发,并探讨国家应对计划如何影响所有易感物种之间的传播。我们探索了控制策略的变化,绘制了高风险区域,并估计了在反应性环疫苗接种期间接种疫苗的动物数量。最初的疫情范围从1个到357个受感染的农场,实施了长达100天的控制措施,包括控制区、30天的流动禁令、人口减少和环形疫苗接种。结合疫苗接种(50-90个农场/天)和人口减少(1-2个农场/天)控制了60.3%的疫情,而类似的疫苗接种但人口减少率更高(3-5个农场/天)控制了62.9%,并将疫情消除速度提高了9天。单独使用人口减少控制了56.76%的疫情,但中位持续时间明显更长,为63天。结合疫苗接种(25-45个农场/天)和人口减少(6-7个农场/天)是最有效的方法,可在中位数3天(最多79天)内消除所有疫情。仅接种疫苗仅控制了0.6%的疫情,持续时间中位数为98天。最终,结果表明,最有效的策略是环形疫苗接种结合种群减少,需要接种疫苗的中位数为925,338只动物。疫情最常发生在人口密集的农业地区,如Potosí、科恰班巴和拉巴斯。我们的研究结果表明,如果在玻利维亚重新引入口蹄疫,仅靠紧急环形疫苗接种无法消除口蹄疫,而将人口减少与疫苗接种相结合可显著缩短暴发持续时间。这些发现为玻利维亚的国家口蹄疫应对计划提供了有价值的见解,包括疫苗需求和人口减少在控制疫情中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 农林科学-传染病学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
350
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions): Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread. Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope. Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies. Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies). Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信