Resilience in Practice: A Systematic Review of Coping Factors for Therapists With Lived Experience of Mental Ill Health

Ana Dumitru, Laura Wijnberg, Caroline E. Brett
{"title":"Resilience in Practice: A Systematic Review of Coping Factors for Therapists With Lived Experience of Mental Ill Health","authors":"Ana Dumitru,&nbsp;Laura Wijnberg,&nbsp;Caroline E. Brett","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Therapists with lived experience of mental ill health (MIH) bring unique insights and empathy to their practice. However, this dual identity creates significant challenges as they balance personal wellbeing with professional responsibilities. This systematic review explores coping strategies and resilience factors to support therapists with MIH. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. Eligible studies focused on coping strategies and resilience mechanisms for therapists with MIH. Databases searched included Web of Science, MEDLINE, ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, and APA PsycINFO, with additional forward and backward citation searches. Data synthesis employed a thematic narrative approach to identify recurring themes. The search and screening process resulted in 14 eligible studies of various designs. Key coping strategies identified were personal therapy, support systems, self-care practices, and reflective techniques. Personal therapy provided a safe space for therapists to process challenges and enhance their professional empathy. Support systems, including peer networks and nonjudgmental supervision, fostered resilience, although stigma and systemic barriers often reduced their accessibility. Reflective practices, such as journaling and supervision, were essential for promoting self-awareness and professional growth. Despite these strategies, therapists faced challenges in managing dual identities and navigating workplace stigma. The studies highlighted the professional value of lived experience in enhancing therapeutic relationships, but systemic support and organizational change were often lacking. This review emphasises the importance of systemic and institutional support in fostering resilience for therapists with MIH. Addressing stigma, providing resources for self-care and supervision, and integrating lived experiences into professional practice are critical. Future research should explore diverse populations and longitudinal perspectives to deepen understanding and inform inclusive practices. Enhancing support for therapists with MIH will ensure their sustained contributions to the mental health field.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Therapists with lived experience of mental ill health (MIH) bring unique insights and empathy to their practice. However, this dual identity creates significant challenges as they balance personal wellbeing with professional responsibilities. This systematic review explores coping strategies and resilience factors to support therapists with MIH. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included studies using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. Eligible studies focused on coping strategies and resilience mechanisms for therapists with MIH. Databases searched included Web of Science, MEDLINE, ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, and APA PsycINFO, with additional forward and backward citation searches. Data synthesis employed a thematic narrative approach to identify recurring themes. The search and screening process resulted in 14 eligible studies of various designs. Key coping strategies identified were personal therapy, support systems, self-care practices, and reflective techniques. Personal therapy provided a safe space for therapists to process challenges and enhance their professional empathy. Support systems, including peer networks and nonjudgmental supervision, fostered resilience, although stigma and systemic barriers often reduced their accessibility. Reflective practices, such as journaling and supervision, were essential for promoting self-awareness and professional growth. Despite these strategies, therapists faced challenges in managing dual identities and navigating workplace stigma. The studies highlighted the professional value of lived experience in enhancing therapeutic relationships, but systemic support and organizational change were often lacking. This review emphasises the importance of systemic and institutional support in fostering resilience for therapists with MIH. Addressing stigma, providing resources for self-care and supervision, and integrating lived experiences into professional practice are critical. Future research should explore diverse populations and longitudinal perspectives to deepen understanding and inform inclusive practices. Enhancing support for therapists with MIH will ensure their sustained contributions to the mental health field.

Abstract Image

实践中的弹性:对有精神疾病生活经验的治疗师应对因素的系统回顾
具有精神疾病(MIH)生活经验的治疗师为他们的实践带来独特的见解和同理心。然而,这种双重身份给他们带来了巨大的挑战,因为他们要平衡个人幸福和职业责任。本系统综述探讨了支持MIH治疗师的应对策略和恢复力因素。该综述遵循PRISMA指南,包括使用定性、定量和混合方法的研究。合格的研究集中在MIH治疗师的应对策略和恢复机制上。检索的数据库包括Web of Science、MEDLINE、ASSIA、CINAHL、Embase和APA PsycINFO,并进行了额外的向前和向后引文检索。数据综合采用主题叙述方法来确定反复出现的主题。搜索和筛选过程产生了14个不同设计的合格研究。确定的关键应对策略包括个人治疗、支持系统、自我护理实践和反思技巧。个人治疗为治疗师提供了一个安全的空间来处理挑战,增强他们的专业同理心。支持系统,包括同伴网络和非评判性监督,促进了韧性,尽管污名化和系统性障碍往往降低了他们的可及性。反思的做法,如写日记和监督,对于促进自我意识和专业成长至关重要。尽管有这些策略,治疗师在管理双重身份和处理工作场所的耻辱方面仍面临挑战。这些研究强调了生活经验在增强治疗关系方面的专业价值,但往往缺乏系统支持和组织变革。本综述强调了系统和机构支持在培养MIH治疗师恢复力方面的重要性。解决耻辱感问题,为自我保健和监督提供资源,并将生活经验纳入专业实践至关重要。未来的研究应该探索不同的人群和纵向视角,以加深理解和为包容性实践提供信息。加强对患有MIH的治疗师的支持将确保他们对精神卫生领域的持续贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信