Özden Tandoğan, Eda Yakıt Ak, Mehmet Ali Şen, Arzu Akdemir, Gülin Gülen Sabancilar, Ezgi Yaraşır
{"title":"Analysis of Knowledge and Beliefs of Women With and Without HPV Diagnosis About the Virus and Vaccine","authors":"Özden Tandoğan, Eda Yakıt Ak, Mehmet Ali Şen, Arzu Akdemir, Gülin Gülen Sabancilar, Ezgi Yaraşır","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/5520955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to compare the knowledge and health beliefs of women with and without an HPV diagnosis regarding the virus and its vaccine.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Designed as a cross-sectional case–control study, the research was conducted with 478 women attending a gynecology outpatient clinic in Istanbul. Data were collected using a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Human Papillomavirus Knowledge Scale (HPV-KS), and the Health Belief Model Scale for HPV Infection and Vaccination (HPV-HBMS).</p><p><b>Results:</b> The findings indicated that women diagnosed with HPV had significantly higher knowledge scores and a greater perceived seriousness of the infection compared to those without an HPV diagnosis (<i>p</i> < 0.05), although overall knowledge levels remained low in both groups. A significant difference was also found between the two groups in terms of HPV vaccine awareness, Pap smear testing, and vaccination status. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher education level, older age, a family history of cervical cancer, previous HPV vaccination, and having undergone Pap smear testing were associated with a reduced risk of HPV infection (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> These findings underline the importance of targeted education and outreach efforts to improve HPV awareness and vaccine uptake among women.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/5520955","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/5520955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the knowledge and health beliefs of women with and without an HPV diagnosis regarding the virus and its vaccine.
Methods: Designed as a cross-sectional case–control study, the research was conducted with 478 women attending a gynecology outpatient clinic in Istanbul. Data were collected using a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Human Papillomavirus Knowledge Scale (HPV-KS), and the Health Belief Model Scale for HPV Infection and Vaccination (HPV-HBMS).
Results: The findings indicated that women diagnosed with HPV had significantly higher knowledge scores and a greater perceived seriousness of the infection compared to those without an HPV diagnosis (p < 0.05), although overall knowledge levels remained low in both groups. A significant difference was also found between the two groups in terms of HPV vaccine awareness, Pap smear testing, and vaccination status. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher education level, older age, a family history of cervical cancer, previous HPV vaccination, and having undergone Pap smear testing were associated with a reduced risk of HPV infection (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: These findings underline the importance of targeted education and outreach efforts to improve HPV awareness and vaccine uptake among women.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.