Contrasting Species Richness in Patches of Alternative Foundation Species Suggests a Framework for Understanding Species of Unusual Effect

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Carrie A. Barker, Kyle E. Harms
{"title":"Contrasting Species Richness in Patches of Alternative Foundation Species Suggests a Framework for Understanding Species of Unusual Effect","authors":"Carrie A. Barker,&nbsp;Kyle E. Harms","doi":"10.1111/jvs.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>Structurally dominant species can be especially influential in plant community assembly and ecosystem function as Species of Unusual Effect (SUEs). For example, indigenous bunchgrasses function as foundation species and ecosystem engineers in the naturally high-diversity groundcover of longleaf pine savannas. Other species structurally dominate relatively small, discrete patches across the savanna landscape, for example, the fern <i>Pteridium aquilinum</i> and the shrub <i>Ilex glabra</i>. Do patch-level species richness or composition of assemblages of groundcover plants, or of arthropods, differ between bunchgrass-dominated groundcover and groundcover dominated by <i>P. aquilinum</i> or <i>I. glabra</i>?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted our study in a restored longleaf pine savanna in southeastern Louisiana.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We compared the groundcover plant and arthropod assemblages within discrete patches structurally dominated by <i>P. aquilinum</i> or <i>I. glabra</i> to adjacent areas dominated by indigenous bunchgrasses. We compared local plant species richness and composition, stem density, aboveground dry biomass, and litter dry biomass, as well as arthropod species richness and composition, abundance, and dry biomass.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Species richness and stem density of nondominant groundcover plants were significantly lower in patches of <i>P. aquilinum</i> and <i>I. glabra</i> than within bunchgrass-dominated areas. Species composition of nondominant groundcover plants was more variable within <i>I. glabra</i> patches compared to bunchgrass areas. Arthropod species richness and abundance were also significantly lower in patches of <i>P. aquilinum</i> compared to bunchgrass areas, and species composition of arthropods differed significantly between <i>P. aquilinum</i> patches and bunchgrass areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>At the local scale of groundcover plant patches—along with their attendant arthropods—indigenous bunchgrasses are associated with higher species richness compared to either of the alternative foundation species <i>P. aquilinum</i> or <i>I. glabra</i>. Removal experiments, community-assembly experiments, or reciprocal replacement experiments should be conducted to test the hypothesis that these species differentially influence the groundcover as, respectively, diversity-enhancing versus diversity-inhibiting SUEs. Our observations exemplify how alternative foundation species could add complexity to natural landscapes by differentially influencing characteristics of their associated local communities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"36 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvs.70070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.70070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions

Structurally dominant species can be especially influential in plant community assembly and ecosystem function as Species of Unusual Effect (SUEs). For example, indigenous bunchgrasses function as foundation species and ecosystem engineers in the naturally high-diversity groundcover of longleaf pine savannas. Other species structurally dominate relatively small, discrete patches across the savanna landscape, for example, the fern Pteridium aquilinum and the shrub Ilex glabra. Do patch-level species richness or composition of assemblages of groundcover plants, or of arthropods, differ between bunchgrass-dominated groundcover and groundcover dominated by P. aquilinum or I. glabra?

Location

We conducted our study in a restored longleaf pine savanna in southeastern Louisiana.

Methods

We compared the groundcover plant and arthropod assemblages within discrete patches structurally dominated by P. aquilinum or I. glabra to adjacent areas dominated by indigenous bunchgrasses. We compared local plant species richness and composition, stem density, aboveground dry biomass, and litter dry biomass, as well as arthropod species richness and composition, abundance, and dry biomass.

Results

Species richness and stem density of nondominant groundcover plants were significantly lower in patches of P. aquilinum and I. glabra than within bunchgrass-dominated areas. Species composition of nondominant groundcover plants was more variable within I. glabra patches compared to bunchgrass areas. Arthropod species richness and abundance were also significantly lower in patches of P. aquilinum compared to bunchgrass areas, and species composition of arthropods differed significantly between P. aquilinum patches and bunchgrass areas.

Conclusions

At the local scale of groundcover plant patches—along with their attendant arthropods—indigenous bunchgrasses are associated with higher species richness compared to either of the alternative foundation species P. aquilinum or I. glabra. Removal experiments, community-assembly experiments, or reciprocal replacement experiments should be conducted to test the hypothesis that these species differentially influence the groundcover as, respectively, diversity-enhancing versus diversity-inhibiting SUEs. Our observations exemplify how alternative foundation species could add complexity to natural landscapes by differentially influencing characteristics of their associated local communities.

Abstract Image

不同基础物种斑块的物种丰富度对比为理解物种异常效应提供了一个框架
结构优势种作为特殊效应物种,对植物群落组成和生态系统功能具有重要影响。例如,在长叶松热带稀树草原天然高多样性地被植被中,本土束草作为基础物种和生态系统工程师发挥着重要作用。在稀树草原上,其他物种在结构上占据着相对较小的、离散的斑块,例如蕨类植物翼蕨(Pteridium aquilinum)和灌木绿冬青(Ilex glabra)。以丛草为主的地被植物或节肢动物的物种丰富度或组合组成是否与以水杨或光斑草为主的地被植物不同?我们在路易斯安那州东南部恢复的长叶松稀树草原上进行了研究。方法在以水杨或光斑草为主的离散斑块内,将地被植物和节肢动物群落与以本地束草为主的相邻区域进行比较。我们比较了当地植物物种丰富度和组成、茎密度、地上干生物量和凋落物干生物量,以及节肢动物物种丰富度和组成、丰度和干生物量。结果在丛草优势区,非优势地被植物的物种丰富度和茎密度显著低于水杨斑块和光叶斑块。与丛草区相比,光草斑块内非优势地被植物的物种组成变化更大。水杨斑块的节肢动物物种丰富度和丰度也显著低于丛草区,且水杨斑块与丛草区节肢动物物种组成差异显著。结论在地被植物斑块及其伴生节肢动物的局部尺度上,本地禾本科植物的物种丰富度高于其他基础物种水杨或光草。应该通过迁移实验、群落组装实验或相互替代实验来验证这些物种分别作为多样性增强和多样性抑制的差异影响地表覆盖的假设。我们的观察举例说明了替代基础物种如何通过不同地影响其相关当地群落的特征来增加自然景观的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信