Analysis of Chandrayaan-3 Lunar Seismic Data: Performance Evaluation and Interpretation of Potential Natural Seismic Events

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Keisuke Onodera, Taichi Kawamura
{"title":"Analysis of Chandrayaan-3 Lunar Seismic Data: Performance Evaluation and Interpretation of Potential Natural Seismic Events","authors":"Keisuke Onodera,&nbsp;Taichi Kawamura","doi":"10.1029/2025EA004307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2023, Chandrayaan-3 landed on the southern hemisphere of the Moon. One of the scopes of the mission was to monitor the seismicity at the landing site, and the Instrument for Lunar Seismic Activity (ILSA) was used to monitor the ground shaking. In this study, to interpret the first lunar seismic data since the Apollo missions, we (a) assessed the ILSA's typical background noise, (b) discussed the detectability of moonquakes by referring to the Apollo observation results, and (c) inspected the natural moonquake candidates listed in a previous study. Regarding the noise assessment, we computed the probabilistic amplitude spectral density and compared it with the spectra of the seismic events identified in the Apollo data to check whether ILSA had the ability to detect them. Our results indicate that artificially driven thermal moonquakes are more likely to be detectable than other types of events. To investigate the origin of about 100 natural moonquake candidates provided by the ILSA team, we analyzed them mainly in the frequency domain. After screening procedures with (a) cross-correlation between natural moonquake candidates and artificial signals and (b) positions of spectral energy peaks, we found that almost all events were closely related to either artificial signals from rover/instrumental operations or eigenfrequencies of the lander/rover. Therefore, we could not find any positive evidence supporting the existence of the naturally driven moonquakes/impacts in the natural moonquake candidates. Still, we expect our background noise model and description of the observed signals would help future studies handle the ILSA data.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EA004307","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EA004307","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2023, Chandrayaan-3 landed on the southern hemisphere of the Moon. One of the scopes of the mission was to monitor the seismicity at the landing site, and the Instrument for Lunar Seismic Activity (ILSA) was used to monitor the ground shaking. In this study, to interpret the first lunar seismic data since the Apollo missions, we (a) assessed the ILSA's typical background noise, (b) discussed the detectability of moonquakes by referring to the Apollo observation results, and (c) inspected the natural moonquake candidates listed in a previous study. Regarding the noise assessment, we computed the probabilistic amplitude spectral density and compared it with the spectra of the seismic events identified in the Apollo data to check whether ILSA had the ability to detect them. Our results indicate that artificially driven thermal moonquakes are more likely to be detectable than other types of events. To investigate the origin of about 100 natural moonquake candidates provided by the ILSA team, we analyzed them mainly in the frequency domain. After screening procedures with (a) cross-correlation between natural moonquake candidates and artificial signals and (b) positions of spectral energy peaks, we found that almost all events were closely related to either artificial signals from rover/instrumental operations or eigenfrequencies of the lander/rover. Therefore, we could not find any positive evidence supporting the existence of the naturally driven moonquakes/impacts in the natural moonquake candidates. Still, we expect our background noise model and description of the observed signals would help future studies handle the ILSA data.

Abstract Image

月船3号月球地震数据分析:潜在自然地震事件的性能评价与解释
2023年,月船3号在月球南半球着陆。任务的范围之一是监测着陆点的地震活动,月球地震活动仪器(ILSA)被用来监测地面震动。在本研究中,为了解释自阿波罗任务以来的第一次月球地震数据,我们(a)评估了ILSA的典型背景噪声,(b)参考阿波罗观测结果讨论了月震的可探测性,(c)检查了先前研究中列出的自然月震候选者。在噪声评估方面,我们计算了概率振幅谱密度,并将其与阿波罗数据中识别的地震事件的谱进行了比较,以检验ILSA是否有能力检测到它们。我们的研究结果表明,人工驱动的热月震比其他类型的事件更容易被探测到。为了研究ILSA团队提供的大约100个自然月震候选点的起源,我们主要在频域对它们进行了分析。经过筛选(a)自然月震候选信号与人工信号之间的相互关系以及(b)光谱能量峰的位置,我们发现几乎所有事件都与来自月球车/仪器操作的人工信号或着陆器/月球车的特征频率密切相关。因此,我们没有找到任何支持自然驱动月震/撞击存在的积极证据。尽管如此,我们希望我们的背景噪声模型和对观测信号的描述将有助于未来的研究处理ILSA数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信