‘Left Behind Places’: Examining the Evolution of a Concept With an Application to the Canadian Regional Development Context

IF 2.1 3区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Morgan Sleeth, Mylène Riva, Kevin Manaugh, Sébastien Breau
{"title":"‘Left Behind Places’: Examining the Evolution of a Concept With an Application to the Canadian Regional Development Context","authors":"Morgan Sleeth,&nbsp;Mylène Riva,&nbsp;Kevin Manaugh,&nbsp;Sébastien Breau","doi":"10.1111/grow.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>‘Left-behind places’ (LBPs) are generally defined as places experiencing economic stagnation and decline, typically reflected in post-industrial regions and rural areas. In recent years, the concept has gained increased popularity within urban and regional studies in the United Kingdom (UK) and other European countries. Research on the topic in the Canadian context, however, remains limited, with few studies specifically discussing how LBPs are defined in Canada, and even fewer attempting to empirically assess where they may be located across the country. The paper's objectives are twofold: (i) it examines the evolution of the concept of LBPs through an extensive literature review and (ii) explores its application to Canada. The paper employs Statistics Canada's 2021 Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (CIMD) dataset as a proxy for identifying LBPs across the country and examines their spatial dynamics at the census subdivision (CSD) level using local indicators of spatial association (LISA) statistics. A multinomial logistic regression model is also developed to explore regional factors. The analysis finds high clustering of CSDs with high levels of deprivation in rural, northern, and remote areas of Canada, as well as high clustering of CSDs with high levels of economic dependency in and around major Canadian cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47545,"journal":{"name":"Growth and Change","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grow.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Growth and Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grow.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

‘Left-behind places’ (LBPs) are generally defined as places experiencing economic stagnation and decline, typically reflected in post-industrial regions and rural areas. In recent years, the concept has gained increased popularity within urban and regional studies in the United Kingdom (UK) and other European countries. Research on the topic in the Canadian context, however, remains limited, with few studies specifically discussing how LBPs are defined in Canada, and even fewer attempting to empirically assess where they may be located across the country. The paper's objectives are twofold: (i) it examines the evolution of the concept of LBPs through an extensive literature review and (ii) explores its application to Canada. The paper employs Statistics Canada's 2021 Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (CIMD) dataset as a proxy for identifying LBPs across the country and examines their spatial dynamics at the census subdivision (CSD) level using local indicators of spatial association (LISA) statistics. A multinomial logistic regression model is also developed to explore regional factors. The analysis finds high clustering of CSDs with high levels of deprivation in rural, northern, and remote areas of Canada, as well as high clustering of CSDs with high levels of economic dependency in and around major Canadian cities.

Abstract Image

“落后的地方”:审视一个概念的演变及其在加拿大区域发展背景下的应用
“留守地区”通常被定义为经历经济停滞和衰退的地区,通常反映在后工业地区和农村地区。近年来,这一概念在英国和其他欧洲国家的城市和区域研究中越来越受欢迎。然而,在加拿大背景下对这一主题的研究仍然有限,很少有研究专门讨论在加拿大如何定义lbp,更少有人试图以经验评估它们在全国范围内的位置。本文的目标是双重的:(i)它通过广泛的文献综述来研究lbp概念的演变,(ii)探索其在加拿大的应用。本文采用加拿大统计局的2021年加拿大多重剥夺指数(CIMD)数据集作为识别全国各地lbp的代理,并使用当地空间关联指标(LISA)统计数据在人口普查细分(CSD)层面检查其空间动态。此外,还建立了多项逻辑回归模型来探讨区域因素。分析发现,在加拿大的农村、北部和偏远地区,贫困程度高的贫困人口高度聚集,在加拿大主要城市及其周边地区,经济依赖程度高的贫困人口高度聚集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Growth and Change
Growth and Change Multiple-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Growth and Change is a broadly based forum for scholarly research on all aspects of urban and regional development and policy-making. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal publishes both empirical and theoretical contributions from economics, geography, public finance, urban and regional planning, agricultural economics, public policy, and related fields. These include full-length research articles, Perspectives (contemporary assessments and views on significant issues in urban and regional development) as well as critical book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信