Balancing detection probability and survey effort in multistate occupancy models: A camera trap simulation analysis

IF 2.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-09-24 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70402
Thomas Osinga, Henrik J. de Knegt, Magali Frauendorf, Tim R. Hofmeester
{"title":"Balancing detection probability and survey effort in multistate occupancy models: A camera trap simulation analysis","authors":"Thomas Osinga,&nbsp;Henrik J. de Knegt,&nbsp;Magali Frauendorf,&nbsp;Tim R. Hofmeester","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Camera trapping has become crucial in wildlife research, enabling detailed observations of elusive and nocturnal species with limited human interference. The use of occupancy modeling to analyze camera trap data is rapidly increasing, aiding in the assessment of species distribution, multispecies dynamics, and the presence of different states of a species (e.g., reproducing or non-reproducing), while considering imperfect detection. Multistate occupancy models, which capture these different states, are particularly effective tools. However, the design of camera trap studies—typically involving large grids with a limited number of cameras and animal observations—often results in sparse data and low detection probabilities, impacting model performance (e.g., convergence) and inference reliability (e.g., accuracy and precision) in basic occupancy models. The effect of these factors on more complex models (e.g., multistate occupancy models) remains largely unexplored. Here, we conducted a series of simulations with varying detection probabilities, numbers of sites, and survey periods for both single- and multistate occupancy models, to evaluate the impact of these factors on model performance and reliability. Our results revealed that multistate models require higher detection probabilities compared to the single-state models. Additionally, minimum needed detection probabilities decreased as the number of surveys increased for all models. Furthermore, the number of sites required was substantially higher for multistate models compared to single-state models. We conclude that when detection probabilities are low, occupancy models encounter difficulties in fitting and produce unreliable results. Strategies such as deploying clustered cameras, targeted camera placement (e.g., at frequent wildlife paths) or using bait to increase detection rates could be used to address these issues but may introduce other biases. The gained model performance from higher detection probabilities might outweigh these biases. Moreover, different data aggregation strategies in combination with increasing the length of the study can increase detection probabilities, addressing reliability issues; however, this is not always feasible due to time constraints (e.g., season-based research questions). This study highlights key thresholds and considerations for improving the use of multistate occupancy models using camera trap data, aiding in the design of more effective wildlife research studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70402","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Camera trapping has become crucial in wildlife research, enabling detailed observations of elusive and nocturnal species with limited human interference. The use of occupancy modeling to analyze camera trap data is rapidly increasing, aiding in the assessment of species distribution, multispecies dynamics, and the presence of different states of a species (e.g., reproducing or non-reproducing), while considering imperfect detection. Multistate occupancy models, which capture these different states, are particularly effective tools. However, the design of camera trap studies—typically involving large grids with a limited number of cameras and animal observations—often results in sparse data and low detection probabilities, impacting model performance (e.g., convergence) and inference reliability (e.g., accuracy and precision) in basic occupancy models. The effect of these factors on more complex models (e.g., multistate occupancy models) remains largely unexplored. Here, we conducted a series of simulations with varying detection probabilities, numbers of sites, and survey periods for both single- and multistate occupancy models, to evaluate the impact of these factors on model performance and reliability. Our results revealed that multistate models require higher detection probabilities compared to the single-state models. Additionally, minimum needed detection probabilities decreased as the number of surveys increased for all models. Furthermore, the number of sites required was substantially higher for multistate models compared to single-state models. We conclude that when detection probabilities are low, occupancy models encounter difficulties in fitting and produce unreliable results. Strategies such as deploying clustered cameras, targeted camera placement (e.g., at frequent wildlife paths) or using bait to increase detection rates could be used to address these issues but may introduce other biases. The gained model performance from higher detection probabilities might outweigh these biases. Moreover, different data aggregation strategies in combination with increasing the length of the study can increase detection probabilities, addressing reliability issues; however, this is not always feasible due to time constraints (e.g., season-based research questions). This study highlights key thresholds and considerations for improving the use of multistate occupancy models using camera trap data, aiding in the design of more effective wildlife research studies.

Abstract Image

在多状态占用模型中平衡检测概率和调查努力:一个相机陷阱模拟分析
相机陷阱在野生动物研究中变得至关重要,它使人们能够在有限的人为干扰下详细观察难以捉摸的和夜间活动的物种。利用占用模型来分析相机陷阱数据的使用正在迅速增加,有助于评估物种分布,多物种动态以及物种不同状态(例如,繁殖或非繁殖)的存在,同时考虑到不完善的检测。捕获这些不同状态的多状态占用模型是特别有效的工具。然而,相机陷阱研究的设计-通常涉及具有有限数量的相机和动物观察的大网格-通常导致稀疏的数据和低检测概率,影响基本占用模型的模型性能(例如收敛性)和推理可靠性(例如准确性和精度)。这些因素对更复杂的模型(例如,多状态占用模型)的影响在很大程度上仍未被探索。在这里,我们对单状态和多状态占用模型进行了一系列具有不同检测概率、站点数量和调查周期的模拟,以评估这些因素对模型性能和可靠性的影响。我们的结果表明,与单状态模型相比,多状态模型需要更高的检测概率。此外,最小需要的检测概率随着所有模型的调查次数的增加而降低。此外,与单状态模型相比,多状态模型所需的站点数量要多得多。我们的结论是,当检测概率较低时,占用模型会遇到拟合困难并产生不可靠的结果。部署集群摄像机、有针对性地放置摄像机(例如,在经常出现的野生动物路径上)或使用诱饵来提高检出率等策略可以用来解决这些问题,但可能会引入其他偏见。从更高的检测概率中获得的模型性能可能会超过这些偏差。此外,不同的数据聚合策略与增加研究长度相结合可以增加检测概率,解决可靠性问题;然而,由于时间限制(例如,基于季节的研究问题),这并不总是可行的。本研究强调了使用相机陷阱数据改进多状态占用模型的关键阈值和考虑因素,有助于设计更有效的野生动物研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信