Esteban Amaya, Henrry Rojas-Asuero, Hernán Santa María
{"title":"Evaluation of seismic anchor systems in bridges: performance under multidirectional seismic loads","authors":"Esteban Amaya, Henrry Rojas-Asuero, Hernán Santa María","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02161-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the effectiveness of seismic anchor systems—namely, vertical seismic bars and pre-tensioned cables—in mitigating uplift and controlling displacements in bridges subjected to both horizontal and vertical seismic loads. Time-history analyses were conducted using detailed three-dimensional nonlinear models to assess the performance of different anchor configurations under various seismic scenarios. Seismic records were carefully selected to capture maximum demands in either the horizontal or vertical direction, with corresponding components applied to represent the seismic demands accurately. The analysis focuses on the role of prestressing levels in cable-based anchors, examining how they influence the reduction of uplift and control of horizontal displacements. Fragility curves were developed to quantify the probabilities of damage for different anchor configurations. The results demonstrate that both seismic bars and prestressed cables significantly reduce uplift at high-intensity levels, with prestressed cables at 50% of their yield strength offering the most effective solution. Increasing prestress levels beyond 50% yielded minimal additional improvement. Furthermore, vertical anchors enhance the connection between the bridge superstructure and substructure, reducing the probability of damage due to horizontal displacement, though they also increase the forces transmitted to the columns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 8","pages":"3451 - 3481"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02161-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of seismic anchor systems—namely, vertical seismic bars and pre-tensioned cables—in mitigating uplift and controlling displacements in bridges subjected to both horizontal and vertical seismic loads. Time-history analyses were conducted using detailed three-dimensional nonlinear models to assess the performance of different anchor configurations under various seismic scenarios. Seismic records were carefully selected to capture maximum demands in either the horizontal or vertical direction, with corresponding components applied to represent the seismic demands accurately. The analysis focuses on the role of prestressing levels in cable-based anchors, examining how they influence the reduction of uplift and control of horizontal displacements. Fragility curves were developed to quantify the probabilities of damage for different anchor configurations. The results demonstrate that both seismic bars and prestressed cables significantly reduce uplift at high-intensity levels, with prestressed cables at 50% of their yield strength offering the most effective solution. Increasing prestress levels beyond 50% yielded minimal additional improvement. Furthermore, vertical anchors enhance the connection between the bridge superstructure and substructure, reducing the probability of damage due to horizontal displacement, though they also increase the forces transmitted to the columns.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.