Analysis the Turbulence Modulation at the Edge of IR-T1 Tokamak through Biasing and Resonant Helical Magnetic Field by Empirical Mode Decomposition Technique

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mansoureh Lafouti
{"title":"Analysis the Turbulence Modulation at the Edge of IR-T1 Tokamak through Biasing and Resonant Helical Magnetic Field by Empirical Mode Decomposition Technique","authors":"Mansoureh Lafouti","doi":"10.1134/S0020441225700010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, we investigated the influence of biasing and Resonant Helical Magnetic Field (RHF) on plasma current, ion saturation (<span>\\({{I}_{{{\\text{sat}}}}}\\)</span>), and the gradient of floating potential (<span>\\(\\nabla {{V}_{f}}\\)</span>) using the Multi-Directional Langmuir Probe (MDLP) at the plasma edge in IR-T1 tokamak. The experiment was conducted in three scenarios: only biasing, only RHF, and biasing with RHF (biasing voltage fixed at <i>V</i> = 250 V on plasma edge, RHF with <i>L</i> = 2 and <i>L</i> = 3) were applied to the plasma. Biasing with RHF resulted in an increase in plasma current (19–21 kA), enhanced plasma confinement time (33–34 ms), and reduced plasma resistance. Simultaneously applying biasing and RHF led to an increase in plasma energy compared to the situation with no biasing and RHF <span>\\({{I}_{{{\\text{sat}}}}}\\)</span> decreased by 25% in biasing, 5% in RHF, and 40% in biasing with RHF. <span>\\(\\nabla {{V}_{f}}\\)</span> fluctuations decreased by 3, 2, and 4%, respectively. Applying biasing with RHF reduced the cross-correlation between <span>\\(\\nabla {{V}_{f}}\\)</span> and <span>\\({{I}_{{{\\text{sat}}}}}\\)</span>, increasing their phase difference. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) revealed that biasing with RHF decreased the overall average of Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) amplitude for <span>\\(\\nabla {{V}_{f}}\\)</span> and <span>\\({{I}_{{{\\text{sat}}}}}\\)</span> compared to the absence of biasing with RHF.</p>","PeriodicalId":587,"journal":{"name":"Instruments and Experimental Techniques","volume":"68 1","pages":"47 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Instruments and Experimental Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0020441225700010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the influence of biasing and Resonant Helical Magnetic Field (RHF) on plasma current, ion saturation (\({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\)), and the gradient of floating potential (\(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\)) using the Multi-Directional Langmuir Probe (MDLP) at the plasma edge in IR-T1 tokamak. The experiment was conducted in three scenarios: only biasing, only RHF, and biasing with RHF (biasing voltage fixed at V = 250 V on plasma edge, RHF with L = 2 and L = 3) were applied to the plasma. Biasing with RHF resulted in an increase in plasma current (19–21 kA), enhanced plasma confinement time (33–34 ms), and reduced plasma resistance. Simultaneously applying biasing and RHF led to an increase in plasma energy compared to the situation with no biasing and RHF \({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\) decreased by 25% in biasing, 5% in RHF, and 40% in biasing with RHF. \(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\) fluctuations decreased by 3, 2, and 4%, respectively. Applying biasing with RHF reduced the cross-correlation between \(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\) and \({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\), increasing their phase difference. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) revealed that biasing with RHF decreased the overall average of Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) amplitude for \(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\) and \({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\) compared to the absence of biasing with RHF.

Abstract Image

利用经验模态分解技术分析IR-T1托卡马克在偏置和共振螺旋磁场作用下的边缘湍流调制
在本研究中,我们利用IR-T1托卡马克等离子体边缘的多向朗缪尔探针(MDLP)研究了偏置和共振螺旋磁场(RHF)对等离子体电流、离子饱和度(\({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\))和浮动电位梯度(\(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\))的影响。实验在三种情况下进行:仅偏置、仅RHF和带RHF偏置(偏置电压固定在等离子体边缘V = 250 V, L = 2和L = 3的RHF)。RHF偏置导致等离子体电流增加(19-21 kA),等离子体约束时间延长(33-34 ms),等离子体电阻降低。与不加偏置和RHF \({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\)相比,同时施加偏置和RHF使等离子体能量增加了25% in biasing, 5% in RHF, and 40% in biasing with RHF. \(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\) fluctuations decreased by 3, 2, and 4%, respectively. Applying biasing with RHF reduced the cross-correlation between \(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\) and \({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\), increasing their phase difference. Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) revealed that biasing with RHF decreased the overall average of Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) amplitude for \(\nabla {{V}_{f}}\) and \({{I}_{{{\text{sat}}}}}\) compared to the absence of biasing with RHF.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Instruments and Experimental Techniques
Instruments and Experimental Techniques 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Instruments and Experimental Techniques is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes reviews describing advanced methods for physical measurements and techniques and original articles that present techniques for physical measurements, principles of operation, design, methods of application, and analysis of the operation of physical instruments used in all fields of experimental physics and when conducting measurements using physical methods and instruments in astronomy, natural sciences, chemistry, biology, medicine, and ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信