Continuous hive monitoring reveals colony growth and activity differences among mite-resistant and Italian honey bee stocks

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
William G. Meikle, Milagra Weiss, Vincent A. Ricigliano
{"title":"Continuous hive monitoring reveals colony growth and activity differences among mite-resistant and Italian honey bee stocks","authors":"William G. Meikle,&nbsp;Milagra Weiss,&nbsp;Vincent A. Ricigliano","doi":"10.1007/s13592-025-01188-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The choice of honey bee genetic stock represents an important management decision for beekeepers to improve resilience against biotic and abiotic stressors impacting their operations. Three different genetic stocks of honey bees (Pol-line, Russian and Italian) were monitored in southern Arizona field experiments for two successive 9-month periods (June to February). Continuous monitoring techniques and detailed hive assessments were used to measure differences in colony performance and behavior. On average, Italian colonies produced significantly more brood compared to both Pol-line and Russian bees and had significantly more foragers and adult bees on average than Pol-line colonies. However, both Pol-line and Russian colonies exhibited a faster rate of weight gain during the primary nectar and pollen flow season (June–September) and slower weight loss during the dearth season (October–February) compared to Italian colonies, which corresponded to results from published cage studies. Pol-line colonies started flight activity 10 min later on average than Italian colonies and ended daily flight activity about 30 min later on average than Russian colonies. There were no internal hive temperature differences among bee stocks, but Pol-line colonies maintained the highest carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentrations. Finally, Varroa mite levels in Pol-line and Russian colonies were significantly lower than Italian colonies and were correlated with brood area. Our findings highlight the potential advantages of Russian and Pol-line bees for use in commercial beekeeping operations. These observed stock differences could translate to improved crop pollination efficiency and reduced reliance on chemical mite controls.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8078,"journal":{"name":"Apidologie","volume":"56 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13592-025-01188-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apidologie","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13592-025-01188-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The choice of honey bee genetic stock represents an important management decision for beekeepers to improve resilience against biotic and abiotic stressors impacting their operations. Three different genetic stocks of honey bees (Pol-line, Russian and Italian) were monitored in southern Arizona field experiments for two successive 9-month periods (June to February). Continuous monitoring techniques and detailed hive assessments were used to measure differences in colony performance and behavior. On average, Italian colonies produced significantly more brood compared to both Pol-line and Russian bees and had significantly more foragers and adult bees on average than Pol-line colonies. However, both Pol-line and Russian colonies exhibited a faster rate of weight gain during the primary nectar and pollen flow season (June–September) and slower weight loss during the dearth season (October–February) compared to Italian colonies, which corresponded to results from published cage studies. Pol-line colonies started flight activity 10 min later on average than Italian colonies and ended daily flight activity about 30 min later on average than Russian colonies. There were no internal hive temperature differences among bee stocks, but Pol-line colonies maintained the highest carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations. Finally, Varroa mite levels in Pol-line and Russian colonies were significantly lower than Italian colonies and were correlated with brood area. Our findings highlight the potential advantages of Russian and Pol-line bees for use in commercial beekeeping operations. These observed stock differences could translate to improved crop pollination efficiency and reduced reliance on chemical mite controls.

连续的蜂箱监测揭示了抗螨和意大利蜜蜂种群之间的群体生长和活动差异
蜜蜂遗传种群的选择代表了养蜂人提高对影响其操作的生物和非生物压力源的恢复能力的重要管理决策。在亚利桑那州南部进行了连续两个9个月(6 - 2月)的田间试验,监测了3种不同遗传种群(波兰、俄罗斯和意大利)。使用连续监测技术和详细的蜂群评估来测量蜂群性能和行为的差异。平均而言,意大利蜂群的产仔量明显高于pollline和俄罗斯蜂群,觅食蜂和成蜂的平均数量也明显高于pollline蜂群。然而,与意大利殖民地相比,polline和俄罗斯殖民地在初级花蜜和花粉流动季节(6 - 9月)的体重增加速度更快,而在干旱季节(10 - 2月)的体重减轻速度更慢,这与发表的笼子研究结果相一致。Pol-line殖民地比意大利殖民地平均晚10分钟开始飞行活动,比俄罗斯殖民地平均晚30分钟结束每日飞行活动。蜂群间蜂箱内部温度无差异,但Pol-line蜂群的二氧化碳浓度最高。结果表明,波兰和俄罗斯种群的瓦螨水平显著低于意大利种群,且与产卵面积相关。我们的研究结果强调了俄罗斯和polline蜜蜂在商业养蜂业中的潜在优势。这些观察到的种群差异可以转化为提高作物授粉效率和减少对化学螨虫控制的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Apidologie
Apidologie 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Apidologie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the biology of insects belonging to the superfamily Apoidea. Its range of coverage includes behavior, ecology, pollination, genetics, physiology, systematics, toxicology and pathology. Also accepted are papers on the rearing, exploitation and practical use of Apoidea and their products, as far as they make a clear contribution to the understanding of bee biology. Apidologie is an official publication of the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and Deutscher Imkerbund E.V. (D.I.B.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信