Tensile fracture initiation and propagation of granite and gneiss at wedge splitting tests: Part 1—Effect of notch type on tensile crack initiation and fracture mechanics results

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lars Jacobsson, Johan Sandström, Linus Brander, Mathias Flansbjer
{"title":"Tensile fracture initiation and propagation of granite and gneiss at wedge splitting tests: Part 1—Effect of notch type on tensile crack initiation and fracture mechanics results","authors":"Lars Jacobsson,&nbsp;Johan Sandström,&nbsp;Linus Brander,&nbsp;Mathias Flansbjer","doi":"10.1007/s10704-025-00857-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wedge splitting tests were conducted on a granite and a gneiss with similar mineralogy but different microstructure. The basic properties of the two rock types were characterized by petrographic analyses and mechanical tests. The granite specimens were split in one material direction, perpendicular to the rift plane, and the gneiss specimens were split in three different material directions, parallel and perpendicular to the foliation (and along and across a lineation). The effect of having a large blunt versus a sharp notch on the crack initiation was studied in the granite. The wedge splitting tests are unconventional for testing rocks and allowed to study the crack initiation and propagation under mode I loading condition in the quasi-brittle granite and brittle gneiss. The fracture energy and strain energy release rate were calculated. The strain energy release rate for gneiss, when splitting along and across the foliation, was around 45% and 60% of the values for the structurally isotropic granite. The fracture toughness was calculated from the strain energy release rate and was larger than corresponding values obtained from linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). There was an effect on the early cracking stages by using a sharp notch compared with using a large blunt notch on the granite specimens, but the required largest force to split the specimens remained the same for the two notch types. The crack initiation started at a splitting force corresponding to 78% and 90% of the maximum splitting force on the specimens with a sharp notch and a large blunt notch, respectively. The results with a full force-displacement response during the crack propagation obtained for the brittle gneiss are unique. Most fracture mechanics results on rock materials are obtained from standard tests and LEFM and not via the measured strain energy release rate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":590,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fracture","volume":"249 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10704-025-00857-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fracture","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10704-025-00857-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wedge splitting tests were conducted on a granite and a gneiss with similar mineralogy but different microstructure. The basic properties of the two rock types were characterized by petrographic analyses and mechanical tests. The granite specimens were split in one material direction, perpendicular to the rift plane, and the gneiss specimens were split in three different material directions, parallel and perpendicular to the foliation (and along and across a lineation). The effect of having a large blunt versus a sharp notch on the crack initiation was studied in the granite. The wedge splitting tests are unconventional for testing rocks and allowed to study the crack initiation and propagation under mode I loading condition in the quasi-brittle granite and brittle gneiss. The fracture energy and strain energy release rate were calculated. The strain energy release rate for gneiss, when splitting along and across the foliation, was around 45% and 60% of the values for the structurally isotropic granite. The fracture toughness was calculated from the strain energy release rate and was larger than corresponding values obtained from linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM). There was an effect on the early cracking stages by using a sharp notch compared with using a large blunt notch on the granite specimens, but the required largest force to split the specimens remained the same for the two notch types. The crack initiation started at a splitting force corresponding to 78% and 90% of the maximum splitting force on the specimens with a sharp notch and a large blunt notch, respectively. The results with a full force-displacement response during the crack propagation obtained for the brittle gneiss are unique. Most fracture mechanics results on rock materials are obtained from standard tests and LEFM and not via the measured strain energy release rate.

楔形劈裂试验中花岗岩和片麻岩的拉伸裂纹萌生和扩展:第1部分:缺口类型对拉伸裂纹萌生和断裂力学结果的影响
对矿物学相似但微观结构不同的花岗岩和片麻岩进行了楔形劈裂试验。通过岩石学分析和力学试验对两种岩石的基本性质进行了表征。花岗岩在垂直于裂谷面的一个物质方向上分裂,片麻岩在平行于和垂直于片理的三个不同物质方向上分裂(沿着和穿过一条线理)。在花岗岩中,研究了大钝口和尖口对裂纹起裂的影响。楔形劈裂试验是一种非常规的岩石试验方法,可用于研究准脆性花岗岩和脆质片麻岩在I型加载条件下的裂纹萌生和扩展。计算了断裂能和应变能释放率。片麻岩沿片理和跨片理分裂时的应变能释放率约为结构各向同性花岗岩的45%和60%。断裂韧性是根据应变能释放率计算得出的,它比线弹性断裂力学(LEFM)的相应值要大。在花岗岩试样上使用锋利的缺口与使用大钝的缺口对早期开裂阶段有影响,但两种缺口类型劈裂试样所需的最大力保持相同。裂纹萌生的劈裂力分别相当于有尖锐缺口和较大钝缺口试样最大劈裂力的78%和90%。在脆片麻岩裂纹扩展过程中获得了完整的力-位移响应,这是唯一的结果。大多数岩石材料的断裂力学结果是通过标准试验和LEFM得到的,而不是通过测量的应变能释放率得到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Fracture
International Journal of Fracture 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
13.5 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Fracture is an outlet for original analytical, numerical and experimental contributions which provide improved understanding of the mechanisms of micro and macro fracture in all materials, and their engineering implications. The Journal is pleased to receive papers from engineers and scientists working in various aspects of fracture. Contributions emphasizing empirical correlations, unanalyzed experimental results or routine numerical computations, while representing important necessary aspects of certain fatigue, strength, and fracture analyses, will normally be discouraged; occasional review papers in these as well as other areas are welcomed. Innovative and in-depth engineering applications of fracture theory are also encouraged. In addition, the Journal welcomes, for rapid publication, Brief Notes in Fracture and Micromechanics which serve the Journal''s Objective. Brief Notes include: Brief presentation of a new idea, concept or method; new experimental observations or methods of significance; short notes of quality that do not amount to full length papers; discussion of previously published work in the Journal, and Brief Notes Errata.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信