Structural performance of symmetric and asymmetric plan irregular building structures: A comparative analysis of conventional and grid slab systems

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Samrat Poudel, Tek Raj Gyawali
{"title":"Structural performance of symmetric and asymmetric plan irregular building structures: A comparative analysis of conventional and grid slab systems","authors":"Samrat Poudel,&nbsp;Tek Raj Gyawali","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02179-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rapid urbanization and increasingly complex building designs have led to a rise in structural irregularities, significantly affecting seismic performance. Plan irregularities often induce torsional effects, placing additional stress on structural elements. Slabs play a crucial role in load distribution and stability, particularly in irregular buildings where conventional slabs may not be optimal. Grid slabs, known for their lightweight structure and efficient load transfer, offer a promising solution for enhancing seismic resilience. However, limited research has explored their interaction with irregular building configurations. This study investigates the seismic performance of grid slabs in buildings with varying symmetries, including symmetric, single-axis symmetric, and asymmetric structures. Numerical simulations under dynamic loading conditions were conducted to assess the impact of different grid slab configurations on deflection, shell stresses, interstorey displacement, drift, and torsional irregularities. The findings reveal that optimized grid slab configurations can significantly reduce slab deflections and improve overall seismic performance, particularly in asymmetric buildings. While grid slabs enhance seismic resilience, symmetric buildings inherently offer better structural balance due to their uniform stiffness and load distribution. These insights contribute to the efficient design of earthquake-resistant structures with complex geometries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 8","pages":"3395 - 3420"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02179-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and increasingly complex building designs have led to a rise in structural irregularities, significantly affecting seismic performance. Plan irregularities often induce torsional effects, placing additional stress on structural elements. Slabs play a crucial role in load distribution and stability, particularly in irregular buildings where conventional slabs may not be optimal. Grid slabs, known for their lightweight structure and efficient load transfer, offer a promising solution for enhancing seismic resilience. However, limited research has explored their interaction with irregular building configurations. This study investigates the seismic performance of grid slabs in buildings with varying symmetries, including symmetric, single-axis symmetric, and asymmetric structures. Numerical simulations under dynamic loading conditions were conducted to assess the impact of different grid slab configurations on deflection, shell stresses, interstorey displacement, drift, and torsional irregularities. The findings reveal that optimized grid slab configurations can significantly reduce slab deflections and improve overall seismic performance, particularly in asymmetric buildings. While grid slabs enhance seismic resilience, symmetric buildings inherently offer better structural balance due to their uniform stiffness and load distribution. These insights contribute to the efficient design of earthquake-resistant structures with complex geometries.

对称与非对称平面不规则建筑结构的结构性能:常规与栅格板体系的比较分析
快速的城市化和日益复杂的建筑设计导致了结构不规则性的增加,严重影响了抗震性能。平面的不规则性常常引起扭转效应,对结构元件施加额外的应力。楼板在荷载分配和稳定性方面发挥着至关重要的作用,特别是在非常规建筑中,传统楼板可能不是最佳选择。网格板以其轻量化结构和有效的荷载传递而闻名,为增强地震弹性提供了一种很有前途的解决方案。然而,有限的研究探索了它们与不规则建筑结构的相互作用。本研究探讨了网格板在不同对称建筑中的抗震性能,包括对称、单轴对称和非对称结构。通过动态加载条件下的数值模拟,评估了不同网格板配置对挠度、壳应力、层间位移、漂移和扭转不规则性的影响。研究结果表明,优化的网格板配置可以显著减少板挠度,提高整体抗震性能,特别是在不对称建筑中。虽然栅格板增强了抗震能力,但对称建筑本身由于其均匀的刚度和荷载分布而提供了更好的结构平衡。这些见解有助于有效设计具有复杂几何形状的抗震结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信