Effect of root volume density on the mechanical behaviour of saturated sand under drained and undrained conditions

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yuanjun Jiang, Xin Xia, Xiaobo Hu, Yuanjia Zhu
{"title":"Effect of root volume density on the mechanical behaviour of saturated sand under drained and undrained conditions","authors":"Yuanjun Jiang,&nbsp;Xin Xia,&nbsp;Xiaobo Hu,&nbsp;Yuanjia Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02605-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To determine the effects of root volume density on the mechanical behaviour of sand, drained and undrained triaxial compression tests were conducted on sand with root volume densities of 0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, 2.0%, and 2.4% under different confining pressures. Higher root content formed a denser and more uniform root network in the soil, enabling more roots to mobilize tensile stress, share external loads, and limit volumetric deformation. This enhanced the root-soil composite strength, reduced volumetric strain under drained conditions, and decreased excess pore water pressure under undrained conditions. The roots made a more pronounced contribution to the soil shear strength under lower confining pressures and undrained conditions. Specifically, with increasing confining pressure, the increment in the inherent soil strength far exceeded that in the additional strength provided by the roots. Under undrained conditions, the roots enhanced the soil strength by bearing part of the external loads and preventing the development of excess pore water pressure. Furthermore, the critical state line of a root-soil composite depended on the stress path. Since roots are non-granular materials and their mechanical reinforcement effect varies under different stress paths. Additionally, the roots enhanced liquefaction resistance of the sand by raising the initial effective stress required for triggering static liquefaction and the critical state effective stress. The greater the root volume density was, the stronger the liquefaction resistance of the sand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 8","pages":"3845 - 3869"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02605-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the effects of root volume density on the mechanical behaviour of sand, drained and undrained triaxial compression tests were conducted on sand with root volume densities of 0.8%, 1.2%, 1.6%, 2.0%, and 2.4% under different confining pressures. Higher root content formed a denser and more uniform root network in the soil, enabling more roots to mobilize tensile stress, share external loads, and limit volumetric deformation. This enhanced the root-soil composite strength, reduced volumetric strain under drained conditions, and decreased excess pore water pressure under undrained conditions. The roots made a more pronounced contribution to the soil shear strength under lower confining pressures and undrained conditions. Specifically, with increasing confining pressure, the increment in the inherent soil strength far exceeded that in the additional strength provided by the roots. Under undrained conditions, the roots enhanced the soil strength by bearing part of the external loads and preventing the development of excess pore water pressure. Furthermore, the critical state line of a root-soil composite depended on the stress path. Since roots are non-granular materials and their mechanical reinforcement effect varies under different stress paths. Additionally, the roots enhanced liquefaction resistance of the sand by raising the initial effective stress required for triggering static liquefaction and the critical state effective stress. The greater the root volume density was, the stronger the liquefaction resistance of the sand.

Abstract Image

根体积密度对排水和不排水条件下饱和砂力学特性的影响
为确定根体积密度对砂土力学特性的影响,分别对根体积密度为0.8%、1.2%、1.6%、2.0%和2.4%的砂土在不同围压条件下进行了排水和不排水三轴压缩试验。较高的根含量在土壤中形成了更致密、更均匀的根系网络,使更多的根系能够调动拉应力,分担外部载荷,限制体积变形。这提高了根土复合强度,降低了排水条件下的体积应变,降低了不排水条件下的超孔隙水压力。在低围压和不排水条件下,根系对土体抗剪强度的贡献更为显著。具体而言,随着围压的增加,土体固有强度的增量远远超过根系提供的附加强度增量。在不排水条件下,根系通过承担部分外部荷载和防止超孔隙水压力的发展来增强土壤强度。此外,根土复合材料的临界状态线依赖于应力路径。由于根系为非粒状材料,不同应力路径下根系的机械加固效果不同。此外,根系通过提高触发静态液化所需的初始有效应力和临界状态有效应力,增强了砂土的抗液化能力。根体积密度越大,砂土抗液化能力越强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信