Identification of the optimal ground motion intensity measure and input parameters for assessing liquefaction-induced lateral spreading based on the generalized additive method
{"title":"Identification of the optimal ground motion intensity measure and input parameters for assessing liquefaction-induced lateral spreading based on the generalized additive method","authors":"Jilei Hu, Bin Xiong, Nima Pirhadi","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02607-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seismic intensity measures (IMs) play an important role in predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Many studies identified the optimal IMs for estimating lateral spreading without considering soil and topography parameters, and their findings are based on numerical simulation. These inadequate considerations may lead to impractical and incomplete results. In this paper, therefore, a large amount of real historical data containing multiple factors is collected, in which abnormal or inappropriate data are removed. Thirty-one IMs are calculated using the bidirectional ground motion records from historical earthquake records. Based on historical field data and the corresponding 31 IMs, the optimal IM is identified according to some criteria considering soil and topography parameters including correlation, efficiency, proficiency, and sufficiency analysis. The results show that the composite acceleration intensity<i> I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub> satisfies the four criteria. Additionally, the key input parameters (including <i>I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub>) affecting lateral spreading were analyzed using the generalized additive model (GAM). The average fine content and mean grain size are proposed to be removed in the construction of models, which could significantly reduce testing costs and be more conducive to engineering applications. The proposed GAM with four input parameters, <i>I</i><sub><i>a</i></sub>, <i>T</i><sub>15</sub> (cumulative layers thickness with (<i>N</i><sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub> < 15), <i>S</i> (Slope), and <i>W</i> (free face radio), performs the best after comparing with other machine learning methods and existing empirical models. A flowchart of GAM usage was provided to the engineers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 8","pages":"3887 - 3903"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02607-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Seismic intensity measures (IMs) play an important role in predicting liquefaction-induced lateral spreading. Many studies identified the optimal IMs for estimating lateral spreading without considering soil and topography parameters, and their findings are based on numerical simulation. These inadequate considerations may lead to impractical and incomplete results. In this paper, therefore, a large amount of real historical data containing multiple factors is collected, in which abnormal or inappropriate data are removed. Thirty-one IMs are calculated using the bidirectional ground motion records from historical earthquake records. Based on historical field data and the corresponding 31 IMs, the optimal IM is identified according to some criteria considering soil and topography parameters including correlation, efficiency, proficiency, and sufficiency analysis. The results show that the composite acceleration intensity Ia satisfies the four criteria. Additionally, the key input parameters (including Ia) affecting lateral spreading were analyzed using the generalized additive model (GAM). The average fine content and mean grain size are proposed to be removed in the construction of models, which could significantly reduce testing costs and be more conducive to engineering applications. The proposed GAM with four input parameters, Ia, T15 (cumulative layers thickness with (N1)60 < 15), S (Slope), and W (free face radio), performs the best after comparing with other machine learning methods and existing empirical models. A flowchart of GAM usage was provided to the engineers.
期刊介绍:
Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.