A Brief Review of the Role of Lifestyle Factors in the Relationship Between Urban Air Pollution and Mental Wellbeing from an Evolutionary Viewpoint

IF 8.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jiaqing O, Jiahao Liang
{"title":"A Brief Review of the Role of Lifestyle Factors in the Relationship Between Urban Air Pollution and Mental Wellbeing from an Evolutionary Viewpoint","authors":"Jiaqing O,&nbsp;Jiahao Liang","doi":"10.1007/s40726-025-00358-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose of Review</h3><p>Outdoor air pollution, the scourge of modern urban living, has long been associated with an array of adverse health outcomes. While empirically supported strategies have already been prescribed for individuals to effectively lessen the impact of contaminated air on their physical health, much is still unknown about comparable solutions for mental wellbeing. The utility of an all-embracing framework that could offer a parsimonious elucidation of existing apparently-heterogeneous work is contended to be pivotal, and this narrative review will address this by reviewing recent main findings through the lens of evolutionary mismatch theory.</p><h3>Recent Findings</h3><p>In general, recent evidence suggests that the evolutionary mismatch theorisation (which posits that air pollution–induced lifestyle changes could play an influential role in modifying mental wellbeing outcomes due to their evolutionarily unfamiliar nature) might be valid. More specifically, the air pollution–mental wellbeing link (tentatively) appears to have been influenced by (1) the evolutionarily mismatched curtailment of physical activities, (2) sunlight exposure, and (3) social contact, together with (4) the evolutionarily mismatched overexposure to upsetting information. The jury is still out for the proposed role of the evolutionarily mismatched reduction of greenery exposure, while the very limited evidence does not support the postulated influence of evolutionarily mismatched opportunities for comparisons with others via media.</p><h3>Summary</h3><p>Findings from this review (tentatively) propound that deleterious mental-wellbeing consequences due to urban air pollution could be mitigated if individuals maintain a more evolutionarily familiar lifestyle within the limits of their circumstances.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":528,"journal":{"name":"Current Pollution Reports","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pollution Reports","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40726-025-00358-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Outdoor air pollution, the scourge of modern urban living, has long been associated with an array of adverse health outcomes. While empirically supported strategies have already been prescribed for individuals to effectively lessen the impact of contaminated air on their physical health, much is still unknown about comparable solutions for mental wellbeing. The utility of an all-embracing framework that could offer a parsimonious elucidation of existing apparently-heterogeneous work is contended to be pivotal, and this narrative review will address this by reviewing recent main findings through the lens of evolutionary mismatch theory.

Recent Findings

In general, recent evidence suggests that the evolutionary mismatch theorisation (which posits that air pollution–induced lifestyle changes could play an influential role in modifying mental wellbeing outcomes due to their evolutionarily unfamiliar nature) might be valid. More specifically, the air pollution–mental wellbeing link (tentatively) appears to have been influenced by (1) the evolutionarily mismatched curtailment of physical activities, (2) sunlight exposure, and (3) social contact, together with (4) the evolutionarily mismatched overexposure to upsetting information. The jury is still out for the proposed role of the evolutionarily mismatched reduction of greenery exposure, while the very limited evidence does not support the postulated influence of evolutionarily mismatched opportunities for comparisons with others via media.

Summary

Findings from this review (tentatively) propound that deleterious mental-wellbeing consequences due to urban air pollution could be mitigated if individuals maintain a more evolutionarily familiar lifestyle within the limits of their circumstances.

Graphical Abstract

从进化的角度回顾生活方式因素在城市空气污染与心理健康关系中的作用
室外空气污染是现代城市生活的祸害,长期以来一直与一系列不利的健康结果有关。虽然已经为个人制定了经验支持的策略,以有效减轻污染空气对身体健康的影响,但对于精神健康的可比解决方案,仍有很多未知之处。一个包揽一切的框架的效用,可以提供一个简洁的现有的明显异构的工作的解释被认为是关键的,这篇叙述性的评论将通过进化不匹配理论的镜头回顾最近的主要发现来解决这个问题。总的来说,最近的证据表明,进化不匹配理论(假设空气污染引起的生活方式改变可能在改变心理健康结果方面发挥重要作用,因为它们在进化上是不熟悉的)可能是有效的。更具体地说,空气污染与心理健康之间的联系(暂时)似乎受到以下因素的影响:(1)进化上不匹配的体力活动减少,(2)阳光照射,(3)社会接触,以及(4)进化上不匹配的过度暴露于令人不安的信息。对于进化上不匹配的减少绿化暴露的作用,目前还没有定论,而非常有限的证据并不支持通过媒体与他人比较的进化上不匹配的机会的假设影响。这篇综述的发现(暂时)提出,如果个人在环境限制下保持一种进化上更熟悉的生活方式,城市空气污染对心理健康的有害影响可以得到缓解。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Pollution Reports
Current Pollution Reports Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.40%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Current Pollution Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field of environmental pollution.By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to identification, characterization, treatment, management of pollutants and much more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信