I. Ioannou, S. Bertelli, R.E. Chandler, S. Ohno, A. Shibayama, A. Suppasri, T. Rossetto
{"title":"The 2011 Great East Japan earthquake: fragility of Japanese buildings to ground shaking","authors":"I. Ioannou, S. Bertelli, R.E. Chandler, S. Ohno, A. Shibayama, A. Suppasri, T. Rossetto","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02174-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The quality of post-disaster data directly impacts the reliability of empirical fragility curves. Many seismic studies rely on estimated, rather than measured, ground motion intensity due to the limited number of recording stations. However, this study utilizes a unique database of over 7,817 buildings surveyed near 37 ground motion stations in the prefectures of Fukushima, Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures following the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. This research examines damage data inland of the tsunami inundation zone, which has received little attention. A flexible Bayesian framework is employed to construct fragility curves, accounting for data overdispersion and uncertainty in the actual level of ground motion intensity experienced by the buildings. Despite large uncertainties, the results reveal that post-2000 buildings demonstrated superior seismic performance, while pre-1981 buildings were the most vulnerable. Contrary to observations from the 1995 Kobe earthquake, heavy steel frame buildings emerged as the most susceptible to damage, whereas wooden buildings performed similarly to reinforced concrete and light steel frame structures. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis indicates that the difference between the recorded ground motion intensity and the level actually experienced by the buildings surveyed in the station’s vicinity has a negligible impact on the fragility curves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 8","pages":"3173 - 3201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02174-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02174-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The quality of post-disaster data directly impacts the reliability of empirical fragility curves. Many seismic studies rely on estimated, rather than measured, ground motion intensity due to the limited number of recording stations. However, this study utilizes a unique database of over 7,817 buildings surveyed near 37 ground motion stations in the prefectures of Fukushima, Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures following the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. This research examines damage data inland of the tsunami inundation zone, which has received little attention. A flexible Bayesian framework is employed to construct fragility curves, accounting for data overdispersion and uncertainty in the actual level of ground motion intensity experienced by the buildings. Despite large uncertainties, the results reveal that post-2000 buildings demonstrated superior seismic performance, while pre-1981 buildings were the most vulnerable. Contrary to observations from the 1995 Kobe earthquake, heavy steel frame buildings emerged as the most susceptible to damage, whereas wooden buildings performed similarly to reinforced concrete and light steel frame structures. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis indicates that the difference between the recorded ground motion intensity and the level actually experienced by the buildings surveyed in the station’s vicinity has a negligible impact on the fragility curves.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.