The 2011 Great East Japan earthquake: fragility of Japanese buildings to ground shaking

IF 4.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
I. Ioannou, S. Bertelli, R.E. Chandler, S. Ohno, A. Shibayama, A. Suppasri, T. Rossetto
{"title":"The 2011 Great East Japan earthquake: fragility of Japanese buildings to ground shaking","authors":"I. Ioannou,&nbsp;S. Bertelli,&nbsp;R.E. Chandler,&nbsp;S. Ohno,&nbsp;A. Shibayama,&nbsp;A. Suppasri,&nbsp;T. Rossetto","doi":"10.1007/s10518-025-02174-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The quality of post-disaster data directly impacts the reliability of empirical fragility curves. Many seismic studies rely on estimated, rather than measured, ground motion intensity due to the limited number of recording stations. However, this study utilizes a unique database of over 7,817 buildings surveyed near 37 ground motion stations in the prefectures of Fukushima, Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures following the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. This research examines damage data inland of the tsunami inundation zone, which has received little attention. A flexible Bayesian framework is employed to construct fragility curves, accounting for data overdispersion and uncertainty in the actual level of ground motion intensity experienced by the buildings. Despite large uncertainties, the results reveal that post-2000 buildings demonstrated superior seismic performance, while pre-1981 buildings were the most vulnerable. Contrary to observations from the 1995 Kobe earthquake, heavy steel frame buildings emerged as the most susceptible to damage, whereas wooden buildings performed similarly to reinforced concrete and light steel frame structures. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis indicates that the difference between the recorded ground motion intensity and the level actually experienced by the buildings surveyed in the station’s vicinity has a negligible impact on the fragility curves.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"23 8","pages":"3173 - 3201"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-025-02174-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-025-02174-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of post-disaster data directly impacts the reliability of empirical fragility curves. Many seismic studies rely on estimated, rather than measured, ground motion intensity due to the limited number of recording stations. However, this study utilizes a unique database of over 7,817 buildings surveyed near 37 ground motion stations in the prefectures of Fukushima, Miyagi and Iwate Prefectures following the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. This research examines damage data inland of the tsunami inundation zone, which has received little attention. A flexible Bayesian framework is employed to construct fragility curves, accounting for data overdispersion and uncertainty in the actual level of ground motion intensity experienced by the buildings. Despite large uncertainties, the results reveal that post-2000 buildings demonstrated superior seismic performance, while pre-1981 buildings were the most vulnerable. Contrary to observations from the 1995 Kobe earthquake, heavy steel frame buildings emerged as the most susceptible to damage, whereas wooden buildings performed similarly to reinforced concrete and light steel frame structures. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis indicates that the difference between the recorded ground motion intensity and the level actually experienced by the buildings surveyed in the station’s vicinity has a negligible impact on the fragility curves.

2011年东日本大地震:日本建筑对地面震动的脆弱性
灾后数据的质量直接影响经验脆弱性曲线的可靠性。由于记录台站数量有限,许多地震研究依赖于估计而不是测量的地面运动强度。然而,这项研究利用了一个独特的数据库,该数据库调查了2011年东日本大地震后福岛县、宫城县和岩手县37个地面运动站附近的7817座建筑物。本研究考察了海啸淹没区内陆的破坏数据,这方面很少受到关注。考虑到建筑物实际经历的地震动强度水平的数据过分散和不确定性,采用灵活的贝叶斯框架构建易损曲线。尽管存在很大的不确定性,但结果表明,2000年以后的建筑表现出优越的抗震性能,而1981年以前的建筑最脆弱。与1995年神户地震的观察结果相反,重型钢框架建筑最容易受到破坏,而木制建筑的表现与钢筋混凝土和轻钢框架结构相似。此外,敏感性分析表明,记录的地面运动强度与监测站附近建筑物实际经历的水平之间的差异对易损性曲线的影响可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信