A genetic programming model for estimating the rock mass deformation modulus based on analytical parameters

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mohammad Reza Shahverdiloo, Shokrollah Zare
{"title":"A genetic programming model for estimating the rock mass deformation modulus based on analytical parameters","authors":"Mohammad Reza Shahverdiloo,&nbsp;Shokrollah Zare","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04387-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus (<span>\\({\\mathrm{D}}_{\\mathrm{f}}\\)</span>) via an empirical model has an approximately half-century history. However, reliable estimation of <span>\\({\\mathrm{D}}_{\\mathrm{f}}\\)</span> has been a challenging task in terms of the theoretical concept of input parameters and data analysis methods. Analytical models present the principal input parameters; however, the concept of principal input parameters (PIP) will develop with an emphasis on in situ stress by participating in the confined Young's modulus and shear and normal joint stiffness at a specified normal stress. A review of seventy empirical models revealed that the majority of existing empirical relationships suffer from a lack of PIP. In this study, based on the geological strength index (29 &lt; GSI &lt; 83), confined Young's modulus, and shear and normal joint stiffness at specified normal stresses, the deformation modulus (1 &lt; <span>\\({\\mathrm{D}}_{\\mathrm{f}}\\)</span>  &lt; 39.8 GPa) is forecasted by an empirical model. The database copes quite well with eighty-two data sets of different rock types. A new multigene genetic program (MGP) integrates five genes with a maximum depth of three as an optimal mathematical relationship in terms of fitness functions. A comparison of the estimated deformation modulus with several existing empirical models based on the same database confirms the superiority of the new MGP. The integration of the analytical base PIP improves the global acceptability of empirical models in analytical or numerical analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04387-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The estimation of the rock mass deformation modulus (\({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{f}}\)) via an empirical model has an approximately half-century history. However, reliable estimation of \({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{f}}\) has been a challenging task in terms of the theoretical concept of input parameters and data analysis methods. Analytical models present the principal input parameters; however, the concept of principal input parameters (PIP) will develop with an emphasis on in situ stress by participating in the confined Young's modulus and shear and normal joint stiffness at a specified normal stress. A review of seventy empirical models revealed that the majority of existing empirical relationships suffer from a lack of PIP. In this study, based on the geological strength index (29 < GSI < 83), confined Young's modulus, and shear and normal joint stiffness at specified normal stresses, the deformation modulus (1 < \({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{f}}\)  < 39.8 GPa) is forecasted by an empirical model. The database copes quite well with eighty-two data sets of different rock types. A new multigene genetic program (MGP) integrates five genes with a maximum depth of three as an optimal mathematical relationship in terms of fitness functions. A comparison of the estimated deformation modulus with several existing empirical models based on the same database confirms the superiority of the new MGP. The integration of the analytical base PIP improves the global acceptability of empirical models in analytical or numerical analysis.

Abstract Image

基于解析参数估计岩体变形模量的遗传规划模型
通过经验模型估计岩体变形模量(\({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{f}}\))大约有半个世纪的历史。然而,在输入参数的理论概念和数据分析方法方面,对\({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{f}}\)的可靠估计一直是一项具有挑战性的任务。解析模型给出了主要输入参数;然而,主输入参数(PIP)的概念将发展,重点是通过参与指定法向应力下的受限杨氏模量、剪切和法向节点刚度来研究原位应力。对70个经验模型的回顾表明,大多数现有的经验关系都缺乏PIP。本研究基于地质强度指标(29 &lt; GSI &lt; 83)、限定杨氏模量、指定正应力下节理剪切刚度和法向刚度,采用经验模型预测了变形模量(1 &lt; \({\mathrm{D}}_{\mathrm{f}}\) &lt; 39.8 GPa)。该数据库可以很好地处理82组不同岩石类型的数据集。一种新的多基因遗传程序(MGP)将5个基因以最大深度3作为适应度函数的最优数学关系进行整合。将估计的变形模量与基于同一数据库的几种现有经验模型进行了比较,证实了新模型的优越性。分析基础PIP的整合提高了经验模型在分析或数值分析中的全球可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信