Exploring the artificial intelligence interaction profiles of participants with different levels of teaching experience for lesson planning in the context of acids and bases

IF 3.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sevgi Aydin Gunbatar, Gizem Tezcan Sirin, Onur Can Ilkyaz and Yusuf Mutlu
{"title":"Exploring the artificial intelligence interaction profiles of participants with different levels of teaching experience for lesson planning in the context of acids and bases","authors":"Sevgi Aydin Gunbatar, Gizem Tezcan Sirin, Onur Can Ilkyaz and Yusuf Mutlu","doi":"10.1039/D5RP00064E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In this multi-case study, the ChatGPT interaction profiles of participants with varying years of teaching experience were examined during lesson planning for the topic of acids and bases. Six participants (<em>i.e.</em>, two senior pre-service science teachers, one induction year science teacher, two experienced science teachers, and an experienced science teacher educator) participated in the study. A lesson plan in the Content Representation (CoRe) format, a copy of dialogue with ChatGPT (<em>i.e.</em>, conversation history with ChatGPT), a reflection paper on details of the lesson planning with ChatGPT, and online focus group interview data were collected from all participants. Both deductive and inductive analyses of the multiple data sources revealed four profiles, namely, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-reliant planners, AI-collaborative planners, AI-assisted plan refiners, and AI-independent planners. The profiles differed from each other in terms of the flow of lesson planning with AI, the interaction purposes of the participants with ChatGPT during lesson planning, and the extent to which the participants incorporated the content provided by ChatGPT into their lesson plan preparation. In light of the results, science pre-service teachers and teachers should be trained on what AI can offer them, how AI tools can be effectively utilized in science education, and the ethical considerations of AI use.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 4","pages":" 977-995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d5rp00064e","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this multi-case study, the ChatGPT interaction profiles of participants with varying years of teaching experience were examined during lesson planning for the topic of acids and bases. Six participants (i.e., two senior pre-service science teachers, one induction year science teacher, two experienced science teachers, and an experienced science teacher educator) participated in the study. A lesson plan in the Content Representation (CoRe) format, a copy of dialogue with ChatGPT (i.e., conversation history with ChatGPT), a reflection paper on details of the lesson planning with ChatGPT, and online focus group interview data were collected from all participants. Both deductive and inductive analyses of the multiple data sources revealed four profiles, namely, Artificial Intelligence (AI)-reliant planners, AI-collaborative planners, AI-assisted plan refiners, and AI-independent planners. The profiles differed from each other in terms of the flow of lesson planning with AI, the interaction purposes of the participants with ChatGPT during lesson planning, and the extent to which the participants incorporated the content provided by ChatGPT into their lesson plan preparation. In light of the results, science pre-service teachers and teachers should be trained on what AI can offer them, how AI tools can be effectively utilized in science education, and the ethical considerations of AI use.

探索不同教学经验水平的参与者在酸碱环境下的人工智能交互模式
在这个多案例研究中,在酸碱主题的课程规划期间,研究了具有不同教学经验的参与者的ChatGPT互动概况。6名被试(即2名高级职前科学教师、1名入职年度科学教师、2名资深科学教师和1名资深科学教师教育者)参与了研究。从所有参与者那里收集了内容表示(CoRe)格式的课程计划,与ChatGPT的对话副本(即与ChatGPT的对话历史),关于使用ChatGPT课程计划细节的反思论文,以及在线焦点小组访谈数据。对多个数据源的演绎和归纳分析揭示了四种类型,即依赖人工智能(AI)的规划者、人工智能协同规划者、人工智能辅助的规划细化者和人工智能独立规划者。在人工智能课程计划的流程、参与者在课程计划期间与ChatGPT的互动目的以及参与者将ChatGPT提供的内容纳入其课程计划准备的程度方面,这些概况彼此不同。根据研究结果,应该对科学职前教师和教师进行培训,了解人工智能可以为他们提供什么,如何在科学教育中有效地利用人工智能工具,以及使用人工智能的伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信