Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal Yields Higher 131I Absorbed Dose to Metastases Than rhTSH Stimulation in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Evidence from a Large 124I PET/CT Dosimetry Cohort

Ieva Čiučiulkaitė, Giulia A. Zuccotti, Cherbel Jallo, Hubertus Hautzel, Tim Brandenburg, Pedro F. Costa, Alina T. Küper, Stephan M. Himmen, Rainer Görges, Andreas Bockisch, Ken Herrmann, Walter Jentzen, David Kersting, Wolfgang P. Fendler
{"title":"Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal Yields Higher 131I Absorbed Dose to Metastases Than rhTSH Stimulation in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Evidence from a Large 124I PET/CT Dosimetry Cohort","authors":"Ieva Čiučiulkaitė, Giulia A. Zuccotti, Cherbel Jallo, Hubertus Hautzel, Tim Brandenburg, Pedro F. Costa, Alina T. Küper, Stephan M. Himmen, Rainer Görges, Andreas Bockisch, Ken Herrmann, Walter Jentzen, David Kersting, Wolfgang P. Fendler","doi":"10.2967/jnumed.125.270391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Achieving an optimal <sup>131</sup>I absorbed dose in differentiated thyroid carcinoma lesions is crucial for the success of radioiodine therapy. Sufficient thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation before radioiodine therapy can be achieved with either thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or by injection of recombinant human TSH (rhTSH). We compared the predicted <sup>131</sup>I lesion absorbed dose between THW and rhTSH stimulation in patients assessed by pretherapeutic <sup>124</sup>I PET/CT dosimetry. <strong>Methods:</strong> This retrospective study included patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who had undergone total thyroidectomy with or without cervical lymph node dissection and had received <sup>124</sup>I PET/CT lesion dosimetry. All patients underwent TSH stimulation with either rhTSH injection or THW. For lesion dosimetry, 2 <sup>124</sup>I PET/CT examinations were performed after <sup>124</sup>I administration. Using <sup>124</sup>I PET data, the lesion absorbed dose per unit of administered activity (LDpA) of <sup>131</sup>I was calculated for each lesion. Patients and lesions were categorized by the TSH stimulation method used and the clinical indication for dosimetry (adjuvant, residual/recurrent, or metastatic disease). Lesions were further categorized by location (thyroid remnants, cervical lymph node metastases, or distant metastases). <strong>Results:</strong> In total, 453 dosimetry cycles and 949 lesions were analyzed in 367 patients. TSH levels were significantly higher after rhTSH stimulation in the overall patient group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and across all subgroups (<em>P</em> = 0.038 for adjuvant; <em>P</em> = 0.002 for residual/recurrent; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001 for metastatic). Thyroglobulin levels were significantly elevated after rhTSH stimulation in both the overall patient group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and the metastatic subgroup (<em>P</em> = 0.030). LDpA values were significantly higher after THW in the overall patient group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and in the adjuvant subgroup (<em>P</em> = 0.049). LDpA values of thyroid remnants did not significantly differ between both stimulation methods. Conversely, LDpA values were significantly higher after THW in cervical lymph node (<em>P</em> = 0.005) and distant (<em>P</em> = 0.001) metastases. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> As assessed by pretherapeutic <sup>124</sup>I PET/CT dosimetry, absorbed doses to metastatic lesions were higher after THW compared with rhTSH, whereas absorbed doses of thyroid remnants were comparable between both stimulation methods. In this interpatient comparison, data support the use of THW in patients with an elevated risk of metastatic disease; however, a large intrapatient study is warranted for further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":22820,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving an optimal 131I absorbed dose in differentiated thyroid carcinoma lesions is crucial for the success of radioiodine therapy. Sufficient thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) stimulation before radioiodine therapy can be achieved with either thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or by injection of recombinant human TSH (rhTSH). We compared the predicted 131I lesion absorbed dose between THW and rhTSH stimulation in patients assessed by pretherapeutic 124I PET/CT dosimetry. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who had undergone total thyroidectomy with or without cervical lymph node dissection and had received 124I PET/CT lesion dosimetry. All patients underwent TSH stimulation with either rhTSH injection or THW. For lesion dosimetry, 2 124I PET/CT examinations were performed after 124I administration. Using 124I PET data, the lesion absorbed dose per unit of administered activity (LDpA) of 131I was calculated for each lesion. Patients and lesions were categorized by the TSH stimulation method used and the clinical indication for dosimetry (adjuvant, residual/recurrent, or metastatic disease). Lesions were further categorized by location (thyroid remnants, cervical lymph node metastases, or distant metastases). Results: In total, 453 dosimetry cycles and 949 lesions were analyzed in 367 patients. TSH levels were significantly higher after rhTSH stimulation in the overall patient group (P < 0.001) and across all subgroups (P = 0.038 for adjuvant; P = 0.002 for residual/recurrent; P < 0.001 for metastatic). Thyroglobulin levels were significantly elevated after rhTSH stimulation in both the overall patient group (P < 0.001) and the metastatic subgroup (P = 0.030). LDpA values were significantly higher after THW in the overall patient group (P < 0.001) and in the adjuvant subgroup (P = 0.049). LDpA values of thyroid remnants did not significantly differ between both stimulation methods. Conversely, LDpA values were significantly higher after THW in cervical lymph node (P = 0.005) and distant (P = 0.001) metastases. Conclusion: As assessed by pretherapeutic 124I PET/CT dosimetry, absorbed doses to metastatic lesions were higher after THW compared with rhTSH, whereas absorbed doses of thyroid remnants were comparable between both stimulation methods. In this interpatient comparison, data support the use of THW in patients with an elevated risk of metastatic disease; however, a large intrapatient study is warranted for further validation.

分化型甲状腺癌中,甲状腺激素停药对转移瘤的131I吸收剂量高于rhTSH刺激:来自124I PET/CT剂量测定队列的证据
在分化型甲状腺癌病变中获得最佳的碘吸收剂量是放射性碘治疗成功的关键。在放射性碘治疗前充分的促甲状腺激素(TSH)刺激可以通过甲状腺激素停用(THW)或通过注射重组人促甲状腺激素(rhTSH)来实现。我们比较了治疗前124I PET/CT剂量法评估的患者中THW和rhTSH刺激的预测131I病变吸收剂量。方法:本回顾性研究纳入了行甲状腺全切除术伴或不伴颈淋巴结清扫的分化型甲状腺癌患者,并行124I PET/CT病变剂量测定。所有患者均通过注射rhTSH或THW刺激TSH。124I给药后进行2例124I PET/CT检查。利用124I PET数据,计算每个病灶131I单位给药活性的病灶吸收剂量(LDpA)。根据使用的TSH刺激方法和剂量学的临床适应症(辅助、残留/复发或转移性疾病)对患者和病变进行分类。病变进一步按部位分类(甲状腺残余、颈部淋巴结转移或远处转移)。结果:367例患者共分析了453个剂量测定周期和949个病灶。在整个患者组(P < 0.001)和所有亚组(辅助组P = 0.038,残余/复发组P = 0.002,转移组P <; 0.001)中,rhTSH刺激后TSH水平显著升高。rhTSH刺激后,整体患者组(P < 0.001)和转移亚组(P = 0.030)甲状腺球蛋白水平均显著升高。总体患者组(P < 0.001)和辅助亚组(P = 0.049) THW后LDpA值显著升高。两种刺激方法对甲状腺残余的LDpA值无显著影响。相反,THW在颈部淋巴结(P = 0.005)和远处转移(P = 0.001)后LDpA值显著升高。结论:经治疗前124I PET/CT剂量测定,THW对转移灶的吸收剂量高于rhTSH,而两种刺激方法对甲状腺残余的吸收剂量相当。在这项患者间比较中,数据支持在转移性疾病风险升高的患者中使用THW;然而,需要一项大规模的患者内研究来进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信