Applicability Analysis and Energy Quantification of Soil and Water Conservation Measures in the Northern Chinese Black Soil Region

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Haiou Shen, Frédéric Darboux, Dongli Wang, Jianxiang Liu, Xueying Wang, Wei Hu
{"title":"Applicability Analysis and Energy Quantification of Soil and Water Conservation Measures in the Northern Chinese Black Soil Region","authors":"Haiou Shen, Frédéric Darboux, Dongli Wang, Jianxiang Liu, Xueying Wang, Wei Hu","doi":"10.1002/ldr.70208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of soil and water conservation measures on controlling soil erosion have been demonstrated. However, farmer perceptions regarding their applicability in black soil regions remain unclear. Although energy analysis theory provides a useful method for statistically assessing ecological consequences, its application to soil and water conservation remains limited. The objectives of this study were to analyze effectiveness, energy values, and farmer satisfaction with soil and water conservation measures, including contour ridges, straw turnover, agricultural protection forests, planted ridge belts, bench terrace, etc., through field investigations, questionnaire surveys, and energy analysis theory. The findings demonstrated that after implementing these measures on sloping farmlands in the northern Chinese black soil region, approximately 78% of the land remained intact, while 22% of the land was partially destroyed or completely destroyed. Only 72% of the surveyed farmers perceived control efficiency as medium or good, whereas 28% reported poor or low control efficiency. Nevertheless, 91% of the surveyed farmers were satisfied or very satisfied with these measures. The mean energy values were ranked as follows: bench terrace &gt; planted ridge belt &gt; ridge tillage &gt; straw turnover &gt; agricultural protection forest. The greatest variations in energy values occurred in the straw turnover (1.21 × 10<sup>8</sup>−2.81 × 10<sup>8</sup> sej) and ridge tillage (2.34 × 10<sup>8</sup>–4.67 × 10<sup>8</sup> sej) measures. Therefore, quantifying energy values enables a deeper assessment of spatial applicability and popularization for different soil and water conservation measures.","PeriodicalId":203,"journal":{"name":"Land Degradation & Development","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Degradation & Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of soil and water conservation measures on controlling soil erosion have been demonstrated. However, farmer perceptions regarding their applicability in black soil regions remain unclear. Although energy analysis theory provides a useful method for statistically assessing ecological consequences, its application to soil and water conservation remains limited. The objectives of this study were to analyze effectiveness, energy values, and farmer satisfaction with soil and water conservation measures, including contour ridges, straw turnover, agricultural protection forests, planted ridge belts, bench terrace, etc., through field investigations, questionnaire surveys, and energy analysis theory. The findings demonstrated that after implementing these measures on sloping farmlands in the northern Chinese black soil region, approximately 78% of the land remained intact, while 22% of the land was partially destroyed or completely destroyed. Only 72% of the surveyed farmers perceived control efficiency as medium or good, whereas 28% reported poor or low control efficiency. Nevertheless, 91% of the surveyed farmers were satisfied or very satisfied with these measures. The mean energy values were ranked as follows: bench terrace > planted ridge belt > ridge tillage > straw turnover > agricultural protection forest. The greatest variations in energy values occurred in the straw turnover (1.21 × 108−2.81 × 108 sej) and ridge tillage (2.34 × 108–4.67 × 108 sej) measures. Therefore, quantifying energy values enables a deeper assessment of spatial applicability and popularization for different soil and water conservation measures.
中国北方黑土区水土保持措施适用性分析及能量量化
水土保持措施对控制水土流失的作用已得到证实。然而,农民对它们在黑土地区的适用性的看法仍不清楚。虽然能量分析理论为统计评估生态后果提供了有用的方法,但其在水土保持中的应用仍然有限。本研究旨在通过实地调查、问卷调查和能量分析理论,分析等高线垄、秸秆还田、农业防护林、种植垄带、台阶地等水土保持措施的有效性、能量值和农民满意度。结果表明,在中国北方黑土区坡耕地实施这些措施后,约78%的土地保持完整,22%的土地部分或完全被破坏。只有72%的受访农民认为控制效率为中等或良好,而28%的农民认为控制效率较差或较低。然而,91%的受访农民对这些措施表示满意或非常满意。平均能量值排序为:阶地>;人工垄带>;垄耕>;秸秆还田>;农业防护林。能量值变化最大的是秸秆翻耕(1.21 × 108 ~ 2.81 × 108 sej)和垄作(2.34 × 108 ~ 4.67 × 108 sej)。因此,量化能量值可以更深入地评价不同水土保持措施的空间适用性和普及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Degradation & Development
Land Degradation & Development 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
5.5 months
期刊介绍: Land Degradation & Development is an international journal which seeks to promote rational study of the recognition, monitoring, control and rehabilitation of degradation in terrestrial environments. The journal focuses on: - what land degradation is; - what causes land degradation; - the impacts of land degradation - the scale of land degradation; - the history, current status or future trends of land degradation; - avoidance, mitigation and control of land degradation; - remedial actions to rehabilitate or restore degraded land; - sustainable land management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信