Occurrence, fate, and ecological impacts of microplastics in soil: a comparative analysis of conventional, biodegradable microplastics, and tire wear particles
Yefeng Zou , Yun Zhang , Hui Feng , Xueru Liu , Junyao Guo , Hua Zou , Chen Chen , Shan Huang
{"title":"Occurrence, fate, and ecological impacts of microplastics in soil: a comparative analysis of conventional, biodegradable microplastics, and tire wear particles","authors":"Yefeng Zou , Yun Zhang , Hui Feng , Xueru Liu , Junyao Guo , Hua Zou , Chen Chen , Shan Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As plastic waste continues to build up in soil, the issue of microplastics (MPs) has become a global concern. However, there is much less information available on soil-associated MPs compared to aquatic MPs. Most of our knowledge about MPs is primarily based on research on conventional microplastics (CMPs), which may not apply to biodegradable microplastics (BMPs) and tire wear particles (TWPs). Unlike previous reviews that largely focused on CMPs in aquatic systems, this review integrates bibliometric and thematic analyses to comparatively examine CMPs, BMPs, and TWPs in soils, offering a new framework that highlights type-specific behaviors, ecological risks, and critical knowledge gaps. Bibliometric analysis reveals a shift from early emphasis on occurrence and identification toward growing concerns over ecological impacts and contaminant interactions. Thematic analysis summarizes published data about the occurrence, aging processes, and impacts on soil properties and biota, with a focus on the differences between the three types of MPs. Compared to CMPs, BMPs degrade more rapidly and destabilize soil elemental cycles, while TWPs release highly toxic leachates such as carcinogens and heavy metals, which will persist in fauna. The risks posed by BMPs and TWPs may be underestimated, and more research is needed to understand their environmental behavior and impacts. Persistent gaps remain in standardized monitoring, comparative ecotoxicological studies, and long-term field assessments, underscoring the urgent need for integrated, system-level risk evaluation of different types of soil MPs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"386 ","pages":"Article 127151"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125015258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As plastic waste continues to build up in soil, the issue of microplastics (MPs) has become a global concern. However, there is much less information available on soil-associated MPs compared to aquatic MPs. Most of our knowledge about MPs is primarily based on research on conventional microplastics (CMPs), which may not apply to biodegradable microplastics (BMPs) and tire wear particles (TWPs). Unlike previous reviews that largely focused on CMPs in aquatic systems, this review integrates bibliometric and thematic analyses to comparatively examine CMPs, BMPs, and TWPs in soils, offering a new framework that highlights type-specific behaviors, ecological risks, and critical knowledge gaps. Bibliometric analysis reveals a shift from early emphasis on occurrence and identification toward growing concerns over ecological impacts and contaminant interactions. Thematic analysis summarizes published data about the occurrence, aging processes, and impacts on soil properties and biota, with a focus on the differences between the three types of MPs. Compared to CMPs, BMPs degrade more rapidly and destabilize soil elemental cycles, while TWPs release highly toxic leachates such as carcinogens and heavy metals, which will persist in fauna. The risks posed by BMPs and TWPs may be underestimated, and more research is needed to understand their environmental behavior and impacts. Persistent gaps remain in standardized monitoring, comparative ecotoxicological studies, and long-term field assessments, underscoring the urgent need for integrated, system-level risk evaluation of different types of soil MPs.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health.
Subject areas include, but are not limited to:
• Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies;
• Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change;
• Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects;
• Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest;
• New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.