Associations of Summary Measures of Longitudinal Frailty Assessments with Health Outcomes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Assessment of frailty has become common in clinical settings to risk-stratify older adults. Understanding how to use repeated measurements answers important questions both for the clinical use of serial assessments and understanding frailty trajectories. METHODS Using 2012-16 Health and Retirement Study data, we calculated six summary measures of assessments of frailty index (FI, 3 assessments) and Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP, 2 assessments): most recent value, maximum, minimum, mean, standard deviation (SD), and delta. We assessed the association of scaled values with mortality and institutionalization between 2016 and 2018, and three measures of epigenetic aging collected in 2016 using Cox, logistic, and linear regression respectively with adjustment for age, sex, and smoking. We then used LASSO regression to determine which summary measures were most often retained. RESULTS 14,451 and 2,196 individuals had complete data for FI and FFP respectively. The maximum and most recent frailty values had the strongest associations with the outcomes considered, while those of SD and delta were weakest. In LASSO regressions, the maximum and most recent values were most commonly retained (12-13 of 20 regressions), followed by SD (7), mean (6), and minimum and delta (1 each). CONCLUSIONS These findings show that maximum and most recent values of frailty tend to be most strongly associated with mortality. For clinicians, this means that the most recent assessment may be sufficient for many purposes and if historical data are unavailable. FUNDING National Institute on Aging; Office of Research and Development Department of Veterans Affairs).