Sampling efficacy of moving-sweep net collection relative to human landing catch for Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in a rubber plantation.

IF 2
John Aerol Maligaya Nobleza, Jeffrey Hii, Ratchadawan Ngoen-Klan, Jirod Nararak, Watthanasak Lertlumnaphakul, Manop Saeung, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap
{"title":"Sampling efficacy of moving-sweep net collection relative to human landing catch for Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in a rubber plantation.","authors":"John Aerol Maligaya Nobleza, Jeffrey Hii, Ratchadawan Ngoen-Klan, Jirod Nararak, Watthanasak Lertlumnaphakul, Manop Saeung, Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap","doi":"10.1093/jme/tjaf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aedes albopictus (Skuse), the Asian tiger mosquito, is an efficient arbovirus vector adapted to suburban and forested environments, including rubber plantations. Effective surveillance requires reliable sampling techniques to assess mosquito abundance and transmission risk of mosquito-borne diseases. This study evaluated the efficacy of moving-sweep net collection (MSC) relative to human landing catch (HLC) for collecting Ae. albopictus during peak biting periods and estimated their parity rates, mosquito longevity, and vectorial capacity (VC). Both methods were evaluated in 3 rubber tree plots by rotating collectors' positions with respect to methods and plots over 24 d, with daily collection conducted from 07:00 to 10:00 and from 14:00 to 17:00. A Generalized Linear Mixed Model analysis with negative binomial distribution revealed HLC generally outperformed MSC in morning collections. However, afternoon collections consistently yielded higher mosquito counts across both methods and specific plots, with MSC occasionally showing higher efficiency in the afternoon. Both MSC and HLC significantly affect the age structure estimation of Ae. albopictus, particularly in the morning, where MSC captured a greater proportion of parous and older females. These differences in collection efficacy and parity rates influenced survival and infective lifespan, leading to MSC-collected mosquitoes showing a slightly higher estimation of VC than HLC. While HLC is practical for small areas, it is less effective for sampling spatially scattered mosquitoes. Whereas MSC is a reliable, efficient, and rapid sampling technique for representative sampling of mosquitoes in large, heterogeneous areas. Integrating standardized sampling methods such as MSC and HLC with age-grading techniques can improve vector surveillance and disease risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjaf108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aedes albopictus (Skuse), the Asian tiger mosquito, is an efficient arbovirus vector adapted to suburban and forested environments, including rubber plantations. Effective surveillance requires reliable sampling techniques to assess mosquito abundance and transmission risk of mosquito-borne diseases. This study evaluated the efficacy of moving-sweep net collection (MSC) relative to human landing catch (HLC) for collecting Ae. albopictus during peak biting periods and estimated their parity rates, mosquito longevity, and vectorial capacity (VC). Both methods were evaluated in 3 rubber tree plots by rotating collectors' positions with respect to methods and plots over 24 d, with daily collection conducted from 07:00 to 10:00 and from 14:00 to 17:00. A Generalized Linear Mixed Model analysis with negative binomial distribution revealed HLC generally outperformed MSC in morning collections. However, afternoon collections consistently yielded higher mosquito counts across both methods and specific plots, with MSC occasionally showing higher efficiency in the afternoon. Both MSC and HLC significantly affect the age structure estimation of Ae. albopictus, particularly in the morning, where MSC captured a greater proportion of parous and older females. These differences in collection efficacy and parity rates influenced survival and infective lifespan, leading to MSC-collected mosquitoes showing a slightly higher estimation of VC than HLC. While HLC is practical for small areas, it is less effective for sampling spatially scattered mosquitoes. Whereas MSC is a reliable, efficient, and rapid sampling technique for representative sampling of mosquitoes in large, heterogeneous areas. Integrating standardized sampling methods such as MSC and HLC with age-grading techniques can improve vector surveillance and disease risk assessment.

橡胶园移动扫网采集与人工落网采集白纹伊蚊抽样效果比较。
亚洲虎蚊白纹伊蚊(Skuse)是一种有效的虫媒病毒媒介,适合于郊区和森林环境,包括橡胶种植园。有效的监测需要可靠的抽样技术,以评估蚊子的数量和蚊媒疾病的传播风险。本研究比较了移动扫网法(MSC)和人工落网法(HLC)采集伊蚊的效果。并估计白纹伊蚊的产次率、蚊子寿命和媒介容量(VC)。在3个橡胶树样地,分别于07:00 - 10:00和14:00 - 17:00进行采集,在24 d内轮换采集者的位置对两种方法进行评价。具有负二项分布的广义线性混合模型分析显示,高效液相色谱在晨采中普遍优于MSC。然而,下午收集的蚊子数量在两种方法和特定地块上都一致较高,MSC偶尔在下午显示出更高的效率。MSC和hplc对Ae的年龄结构估计有显著影响。白纹伊蚊,特别是在早晨,MSC捕获了较大比例的产妇和老年雌性。这些收集效果和产次率的差异影响了存活和感染寿命,导致msc收集的蚊子的VC估计略高于hplc。虽然高效液相色谱法适用于小区域,但对空间分散的蚊子取样效果较差。而MSC是一种可靠、高效、快速的采样技术,可用于大面积、异质区域的蚊子代表性采样。将MSC和HLC等标准化抽样方法与年龄分级技术相结合,可以改善病媒监测和疾病风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信