Opportunities in stroke care at safety net hospitals: A socioecological perspective.

Equity neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.neuros.2025.100005
Anjail Sharrief, Joshua Wollen, Maha Almohamad, M Carter Denny, Erica Jones, Aardhra M Venkatachalam, Digvijaya Navalkele, Shivika Chandra, Mariam Ahmed, Robert Pratt, Bradley D Shy, John McMenamy, Chigozirim Izeogu, Lesli E Skolarus, Nneka L Ifejika, Nicole R Gonzales
{"title":"Opportunities in stroke care at safety net hospitals: A socioecological perspective.","authors":"Anjail Sharrief, Joshua Wollen, Maha Almohamad, M Carter Denny, Erica Jones, Aardhra M Venkatachalam, Digvijaya Navalkele, Shivika Chandra, Mariam Ahmed, Robert Pratt, Bradley D Shy, John McMenamy, Chigozirim Izeogu, Lesli E Skolarus, Nneka L Ifejika, Nicole R Gonzales","doi":"10.1016/j.neuros.2025.100005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety net hospitals (SNHs) provide care to patients regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay, serving populations at the highest risk for poor stroke outcomes. These include historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, and individuals disproportionately affected by adverse social drivers of health, including lower socioeconomic status, housing instability, and limited access to preventive care. Improving stroke care at SNHs presents a critical opportunity to strengthen care delivery for individuals with the greatest need. However, such efforts require a clear understanding of the barriers across all levels of the healthcare system. In this Perspective, the authors adopt a socioecological framework to explore patient-, community-, institution-, and policy-level influences on stroke care in SNHs. Patient-level barriers include chronic disease burden, limited health literacy, and language barriers. Community-level challenges, such as neighborhood disadvantage, transportation challenges, and food insecurity, contribute to delays in care and recovery. At the institutional level SNHs often face inconsistent access to diagnostic imaging, limited specialty support, variation in stroke center certification, and staffing shortages. At the policy level, financing structures, documentation requirements, and performance metrics may unintentionally penalize under-resourced hospitals. Findings have been synthesized in this text across these domains and highlight opportunities for research, workforce development, and stroke care delivery improvement. A socioecological approach is essential to addressing disparities in stroke outcomes and guiding multilevel strategies that ensure consistent, high-quality care for underserved populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520832,"journal":{"name":"Equity neuroscience","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equity neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuros.2025.100005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety net hospitals (SNHs) provide care to patients regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay, serving populations at the highest risk for poor stroke outcomes. These include historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, and individuals disproportionately affected by adverse social drivers of health, including lower socioeconomic status, housing instability, and limited access to preventive care. Improving stroke care at SNHs presents a critical opportunity to strengthen care delivery for individuals with the greatest need. However, such efforts require a clear understanding of the barriers across all levels of the healthcare system. In this Perspective, the authors adopt a socioecological framework to explore patient-, community-, institution-, and policy-level influences on stroke care in SNHs. Patient-level barriers include chronic disease burden, limited health literacy, and language barriers. Community-level challenges, such as neighborhood disadvantage, transportation challenges, and food insecurity, contribute to delays in care and recovery. At the institutional level SNHs often face inconsistent access to diagnostic imaging, limited specialty support, variation in stroke center certification, and staffing shortages. At the policy level, financing structures, documentation requirements, and performance metrics may unintentionally penalize under-resourced hospitals. Findings have been synthesized in this text across these domains and highlight opportunities for research, workforce development, and stroke care delivery improvement. A socioecological approach is essential to addressing disparities in stroke outcomes and guiding multilevel strategies that ensure consistent, high-quality care for underserved populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在安全网医院中风护理的机会:社会生态学的观点。
安全网医院(SNHs)为患者提供护理,无论其保险状况或支付能力如何,服务于卒中预后不良风险最高的人群。其中包括历史上被边缘化的种族和族裔群体,以及受到不利健康社会驱动因素(包括较低的社会经济地位、住房不稳定和获得预防性保健的机会有限)不成比例影响的个人。改善snh的中风护理提供了一个重要的机会,以加强对最需要的个人的护理服务。然而,这样的努力需要清楚地了解各级医疗保健系统的障碍。在这一观点中,作者采用社会生态学框架来探讨患者、社区、机构和政策层面对snh卒中护理的影响。患者层面的障碍包括慢性病负担、有限的健康素养和语言障碍。社区层面的挑战,如社区不利条件、交通挑战和粮食不安全,导致护理和康复的延误。在机构层面,snh经常面临诊断成像不一致、专业支持有限、卒中中心认证不同以及人员短缺的问题。在政策层面,融资结构、文件要求和绩效指标可能会无意中对资源不足的医院造成不利影响。研究结果已经在这篇文章中综合了这些领域,并突出了研究,劳动力发展和中风护理提供改进的机会。社会生态学方法对于解决卒中结果差异和指导多层次战略至关重要,这些战略可确保为服务不足的人群提供一致的高质量护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书