Continuing to be cautious: Japanese contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with public health recommendations.

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-09-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004600
Tomoka Nakamura, Ryo Kinoshita, Akira Endo, Katherine E Atkins, Hitoshi Oshitani, Yoko Ibuka, Motoi Suzuki, Koya Ariyoshi, Kathleen M O'Reilly
{"title":"Continuing to be cautious: Japanese contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic and their association with public health recommendations.","authors":"Tomoka Nakamura, Ryo Kinoshita, Akira Endo, Katherine E Atkins, Hitoshi Oshitani, Yoko Ibuka, Motoi Suzuki, Koya Ariyoshi, Kathleen M O'Reilly","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite implementing no lockdowns and having a large elderly population, Japan had a low mortality rate due to COVID-19 compared to Europe and North America. The extent to which policies impacted person-to-person contact remains unclear. In this study, we examined changes in contact patterns and their association with behaviors and governmental recommendations in Japan during the pandemic. Ten social contact surveys were conducted between 2021 and 2023 reaching over 1500 participants per survey in Osaka and Fukuoka prefectures where governmental recommendations were first implemented due to high COVID-19 incidence. Their contact patterns were assessed through their demographic characteristics, COVID-19 vaccination status, and individual disease mitigation measures. Generalized linear models were used to identify factors associated with increased contacts. The mean number of contacts during the pandemic declined by at least 49.8% (8.2 weekday contacts and 6.0 weekend contacts per individual, adjusted by age and sex) compared to a study conducted prior to 2020. Weekdays, occupation, larger household sizes, and mask wearing were associated with a higher number of contacts. The frequency and duration of contacts were negatively associated with the issuance of COVID-19 governmental measures, yet the relative change in contacts was not as prominent as pre- and post-lockdown situations in the United Kingdom. There was a gradual increase in contacts with time and less strict public health recommendations. Yet, contacts that did not increase with uptake of COVID-19 vaccination and continuous mask wearing depict cautious behavior across the survey population during the pandemic and into 2023. These results are in contrast with European countries where contacts largely increased among vaccinated individuals compared to the non-vaccinated. Social contacts are country and context specific, highlighting the need for data collection across different communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0004600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite implementing no lockdowns and having a large elderly population, Japan had a low mortality rate due to COVID-19 compared to Europe and North America. The extent to which policies impacted person-to-person contact remains unclear. In this study, we examined changes in contact patterns and their association with behaviors and governmental recommendations in Japan during the pandemic. Ten social contact surveys were conducted between 2021 and 2023 reaching over 1500 participants per survey in Osaka and Fukuoka prefectures where governmental recommendations were first implemented due to high COVID-19 incidence. Their contact patterns were assessed through their demographic characteristics, COVID-19 vaccination status, and individual disease mitigation measures. Generalized linear models were used to identify factors associated with increased contacts. The mean number of contacts during the pandemic declined by at least 49.8% (8.2 weekday contacts and 6.0 weekend contacts per individual, adjusted by age and sex) compared to a study conducted prior to 2020. Weekdays, occupation, larger household sizes, and mask wearing were associated with a higher number of contacts. The frequency and duration of contacts were negatively associated with the issuance of COVID-19 governmental measures, yet the relative change in contacts was not as prominent as pre- and post-lockdown situations in the United Kingdom. There was a gradual increase in contacts with time and less strict public health recommendations. Yet, contacts that did not increase with uptake of COVID-19 vaccination and continuous mask wearing depict cautious behavior across the survey population during the pandemic and into 2023. These results are in contrast with European countries where contacts largely increased among vaccinated individuals compared to the non-vaccinated. Social contacts are country and context specific, highlighting the need for data collection across different communities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

继续保持谨慎:COVID-19大流行期间日本人的接触模式及其与公共卫生建议的关系。
尽管日本没有实施封锁,而且老年人口众多,但与欧洲和北美相比,日本的新冠肺炎死亡率较低。政策对人与人之间接触的影响程度仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们研究了大流行期间日本接触模式的变化及其与行为和政府建议的关系。在2021年至2023年期间,在大阪和福冈县进行了10次社会接触调查,每次调查有1500多名参与者,由于2019冠状病毒病的高发病率,这两个县首次实施了政府的建议。通过人口统计学特征、COVID-19疫苗接种状况和个人疾病缓解措施评估他们的接触模式。广义线性模型用于识别与接触增加相关的因素。与2020年之前进行的一项研究相比,大流行期间的平均接触人数至少下降了49.8%(按年龄和性别调整后,每个人工作日接触8.2人,周末接触6.0人)。工作日、职业、较大的家庭规模和佩戴口罩与较高的接触次数有关。接触者的频率和持续时间与新冠肺炎政府措施的发布呈负相关,但接触者的相对变化并不像英国封锁前后那样明显。随着时间的推移,接触逐渐增加,公共卫生建议也不那么严格。然而,没有因接种COVID-19疫苗和持续佩戴口罩而增加的接触者表明,在大流行期间和2023年,调查人群的行为都很谨慎。这些结果与欧洲国家形成对比,在欧洲国家,接种疫苗的人与未接种疫苗的人相比,接触量大大增加。社会联系因国家和具体情况而异,因此需要在不同社区收集数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信