Ignoring Salient Distractors Inside and Outside the Attentional Window.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Xiaojin Ma, Steven J Luck, Nicholas Gaspelin
{"title":"Ignoring Salient Distractors Inside and Outside the Attentional Window.","authors":"Xiaojin Ma, Steven J Luck, Nicholas Gaspelin","doi":"10.1162/JOCN.a.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There has been much debate about whether salient stimuli have an automatic power to distract us, with many conflicting results. The attentional window account proposes a potential resolution by suggesting that capture depends on the breadth of attentional focus. According to this account, when attention is broadly focused, salient stimuli will fall inside the attentional window and generate a salience signal that captures attention. When attention is narrowly focused, salient stimuli presented outside the window of attention cannot generate a salience signal that attracts attention. If true, this could explain many otherwise-contradictory findings, but this account has not been widely tested. The present study used a shape discrimination task to manipulate the spread of spatial attention and tested whether salient distractors inside versus outside the attended region capture attention. Attentional capture was assessed by the N2pc component and behavioral measures. Contrary to the predictions of the attentional window account, we found no evidence that capture by salient distractors depended on whether the salient distractor was inside or outside the attended window. Instead, our findings support models of attention, which allow feature-based control mechanisms to prevent capture by salient distractors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/JOCN.a.105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been much debate about whether salient stimuli have an automatic power to distract us, with many conflicting results. The attentional window account proposes a potential resolution by suggesting that capture depends on the breadth of attentional focus. According to this account, when attention is broadly focused, salient stimuli will fall inside the attentional window and generate a salience signal that captures attention. When attention is narrowly focused, salient stimuli presented outside the window of attention cannot generate a salience signal that attracts attention. If true, this could explain many otherwise-contradictory findings, but this account has not been widely tested. The present study used a shape discrimination task to manipulate the spread of spatial attention and tested whether salient distractors inside versus outside the attended region capture attention. Attentional capture was assessed by the N2pc component and behavioral measures. Contrary to the predictions of the attentional window account, we found no evidence that capture by salient distractors depended on whether the salient distractor was inside or outside the attended window. Instead, our findings support models of attention, which allow feature-based control mechanisms to prevent capture by salient distractors.

忽略注意力窗口内外的显著干扰。
关于显著的刺激是否具有自动分散我们注意力的能力,有很多争论,有许多相互矛盾的结果。注意窗口说提出了一个潜在的解决方案,认为捕获取决于注意焦点的广度。根据这种说法,当注意力被广泛集中时,显著刺激会落在注意窗口内,并产生捕捉注意力的显著信号。当注意力集中得很窄时,出现在注意窗口之外的显著刺激不能产生吸引注意的显著信号。如果这是真的,这可以解释许多其他方面相互矛盾的发现,但这种说法尚未得到广泛的验证。本研究使用形状辨别任务来操纵空间注意的传播,并测试了在被注意区域内和被注意区域外的显著干扰物是否捕获注意。注意捕获通过N2pc成分和行为测量进行评估。与注意窗口说的预测相反,我们没有发现显著干扰物的捕获取决于显著干扰物是在被注意的窗口内还是在窗口外的证据。相反,我们的发现支持注意模型,它允许基于特征的控制机制来防止被显著干扰物捕获。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.10%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience investigates brain–behavior interaction and promotes lively interchange among the mind sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信