Inspiratory and Expiratory Muscle Strength Training for Persistent Dyspnea in Post-COVID-19.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sandra P Morgan, Bini Thomas, Carmen S Rodriguez, Ayesha Johnson, Theresa M Beckie
{"title":"Inspiratory and Expiratory Muscle Strength Training for Persistent Dyspnea in Post-COVID-19.","authors":"Sandra P Morgan, Bini Thomas, Carmen S Rodriguez, Ayesha Johnson, Theresa M Beckie","doi":"10.1177/10547738251371244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 can create a viral-induced myopathy resulting in dyspnea. Respiratory muscle strength training has recently been reported to reduce persistent dyspnea in individuals with post-COVID-19 symptomology. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a 12-week home-based, respiratory muscle strength training program in reducing dyspnea and to determine its feasibility and acceptability. This single-group trial included adults > 4 weeks beyond the acute COVID illness. Participants were assessed in person at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks for dyspnea, pulmonary symptoms, quality of life, pulmonary function, and functional capacity. Participants received inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscle strength trainers, diaries, weekly phone calls, and were shown how to perform the exercises using a return demonstration during the baseline appointment. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and the Friedman test to evaluate changes over time. There was a significant reduction in dyspnea (2.04-1.39, <i>p</i> = .005), pulmonary symptoms (17.6-11.7, <i>p</i> < .001), and a significant increase in the quality-of-life index score (0.682-0.752, <i>p</i> = .013) and visual analog scale (63.1-71.57, <i>p</i> = .004). Significant improvements in peak inspiratory flow (111.24-195.77 l, <i>p</i> < .001), forced expiratory volume over 1 s (291.29-345.42 l, <i>p</i> < .001), thoracic expansion (2.71-3.88 cm, <i>p</i> < .001) and the 6 min walk test (300.22-391.57 m, <i>p</i> < .001) were also found. Study adherence was >95% and feasibility and acceptability scores were high. Home-based respiratory muscle strength training may be an effective, acceptable strategy that can be used as a standalone treatment to reduce persistent dyspnea in post-COVID-19 survivors. This study was pre-registered with Clinical Trials.gov [NCT06091280]. Clinical Trial URL/ClinicalTrials.gov PRS: Record Summary NCT06091280. IRB approval was provided by the University of South Florida (006272).</p>","PeriodicalId":50677,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"10547738251371244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738251371244","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 can create a viral-induced myopathy resulting in dyspnea. Respiratory muscle strength training has recently been reported to reduce persistent dyspnea in individuals with post-COVID-19 symptomology. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a 12-week home-based, respiratory muscle strength training program in reducing dyspnea and to determine its feasibility and acceptability. This single-group trial included adults > 4 weeks beyond the acute COVID illness. Participants were assessed in person at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks for dyspnea, pulmonary symptoms, quality of life, pulmonary function, and functional capacity. Participants received inspiratory and expiratory respiratory muscle strength trainers, diaries, weekly phone calls, and were shown how to perform the exercises using a return demonstration during the baseline appointment. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics and the Friedman test to evaluate changes over time. There was a significant reduction in dyspnea (2.04-1.39, p = .005), pulmonary symptoms (17.6-11.7, p < .001), and a significant increase in the quality-of-life index score (0.682-0.752, p = .013) and visual analog scale (63.1-71.57, p = .004). Significant improvements in peak inspiratory flow (111.24-195.77 l, p < .001), forced expiratory volume over 1 s (291.29-345.42 l, p < .001), thoracic expansion (2.71-3.88 cm, p < .001) and the 6 min walk test (300.22-391.57 m, p < .001) were also found. Study adherence was >95% and feasibility and acceptability scores were high. Home-based respiratory muscle strength training may be an effective, acceptable strategy that can be used as a standalone treatment to reduce persistent dyspnea in post-COVID-19 survivors. This study was pre-registered with Clinical Trials.gov [NCT06091280]. Clinical Trial URL/ClinicalTrials.gov PRS: Record Summary NCT06091280. IRB approval was provided by the University of South Florida (006272).

吸气和呼气肌力训练对covid -19后持续性呼吸困难的治疗。
COVID-19可造成病毒诱导的肌病,导致呼吸困难。最近有报道称,呼吸肌力量训练可以减少covid -19后症状个体的持续呼吸困难。本研究旨在确定一项为期12周的以家庭为基础的呼吸肌力量训练计划在减少呼吸困难方面的有效性,并确定其可行性和可接受性。这项单组试验包括急性COVID疾病后4周的成年人。在基线、6周和12周时,亲自评估参与者的呼吸困难、肺部症状、生活质量、肺功能和功能容量。参与者接受吸气和呼气呼吸肌力量训练,日记,每周电话,并在基线预约期间通过返回演示向他们展示如何进行练习。统计分析包括描述性统计和弗里德曼测试,以评估随时间的变化。呼吸困难明显减少(2.04-1.39,p =。005),肺部症状(17.6-11.7,p p =。013)和视觉模拟量表(63.1 ~ 71.57,p = 0.004)。吸入峰值流量(111.24-195.77 l)显著改善,p p p p p p 95%,可行性和可接受性评分较高。基于家庭的呼吸肌力量训练可能是一种有效的、可接受的策略,可作为独立治疗来减少covid -19后幸存者的持续呼吸困难。该研究已在Clinical Trials.gov预注册[NCT06091280]。临床试验网址/ClinicalTrials.gov PRS:记录摘要NCT06091280。IRB批准由南佛罗里达大学(006272)提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
107
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nursing Research (CNR) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that addresses issues of clinical research that are meaningful to practicing nurses, providing an international forum to encourage discussion among clinical practitioners, enhance clinical practice by pinpointing potential clinical applications of the latest scholarly research, and disseminate research findings of particular interest to practicing nurses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信