Euthanasia in Italy: A Comparative Analysis in the European Context.

Q2 Medicine
M Marrone, F Pititto, G Pulin, R Bellacicco, N Nuzzo, D Isceri, A Dell'Erba, E Paladini
{"title":"Euthanasia in Italy: A Comparative Analysis in the European Context.","authors":"M Marrone, F Pititto, G Pulin, R Bellacicco, N Nuzzo, D Isceri, A Dell'Erba, E Paladini","doi":"10.7417/CT.2025.5279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The term \"euthanasia\" refers to medical procedures involving the direct administration of a lethal drug to a patient who requests it and meets specific legal and medical criteria. The legal and ethical debate surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide remains a highly controversial issue across Europe, with significant variations in national legislation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study provides a comparative analysis of the Italian legal framework on euthanasia and assisted suicide in relation to European regulations. Italy maintains one of the most restrictive legal stances, categorizing euthanasia as voluntary homicide (Article 579 of the Penal Code) and assisted suicide as a criminal offense (Article 580). The Italian referendum \"Free Until the End\" sought to legalize euthanasia through the partial repeal of Article 579 of the Penal Code. Despite constitutional rulings (Nos. 242/2019 and 135/2024) that in-troduced limited exceptions for assisted suicide under strict conditions, legislative progress has been minimal. In contrast, several European countries - including the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, and Portugal - have enacted comprehensive laws regulating euthana-sia and/or assisted suicide. Other nations, such as Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, have legalized assisted suicide while maintaining restrictions on active euthanasia. Recent developments in France and the United Kingdom signal an evolving legal landscape, while nations like Hungary and Norway uphold prohibitive stances.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The article critically examines the ethical and medico-legal implications of these disparities, emphasizing the role of palliative care and the physician's duty within end-of-life decision-making. It highlights the need for a more structured regulatory approach in Italy that balances the right to life with the principle of individual self-determination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that while legal frameworks across Europe continue to evolve, Italy must reconsider its rigid legal position to address the complex realities of end-of-life care, ensuring both the protection of life and respect for personal autonomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50686,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Terapeutica","volume":"176 5","pages":"665-671"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Terapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7417/CT.2025.5279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The term "euthanasia" refers to medical procedures involving the direct administration of a lethal drug to a patient who requests it and meets specific legal and medical criteria. The legal and ethical debate surrounding euthanasia and assisted suicide remains a highly controversial issue across Europe, with significant variations in national legislation.

Methods: This study provides a comparative analysis of the Italian legal framework on euthanasia and assisted suicide in relation to European regulations. Italy maintains one of the most restrictive legal stances, categorizing euthanasia as voluntary homicide (Article 579 of the Penal Code) and assisted suicide as a criminal offense (Article 580). The Italian referendum "Free Until the End" sought to legalize euthanasia through the partial repeal of Article 579 of the Penal Code. Despite constitutional rulings (Nos. 242/2019 and 135/2024) that in-troduced limited exceptions for assisted suicide under strict conditions, legislative progress has been minimal. In contrast, several European countries - including the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Spain, and Portugal - have enacted comprehensive laws regulating euthana-sia and/or assisted suicide. Other nations, such as Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, have legalized assisted suicide while maintaining restrictions on active euthanasia. Recent developments in France and the United Kingdom signal an evolving legal landscape, while nations like Hungary and Norway uphold prohibitive stances.

Results: The article critically examines the ethical and medico-legal implications of these disparities, emphasizing the role of palliative care and the physician's duty within end-of-life decision-making. It highlights the need for a more structured regulatory approach in Italy that balances the right to life with the principle of individual self-determination.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that while legal frameworks across Europe continue to evolve, Italy must reconsider its rigid legal position to address the complex realities of end-of-life care, ensuring both the protection of life and respect for personal autonomy.

意大利的安乐死:欧洲背景下的比较分析。
背景:术语“安乐死”指的是医疗程序,涉及直接给病人致命药物的要求,并符合特定的法律和医学标准。围绕安乐死和协助自杀的法律和伦理辩论在整个欧洲仍然是一个极具争议的问题,各国的立法差异很大。方法:本研究提供了一个比较分析意大利关于安乐死和协助自杀的法律框架与欧洲法规的关系。意大利保持着最严格的法律立场之一,将安乐死归类为自愿杀人(刑法第579条),将协助自杀归类为刑事犯罪(刑法第580条)。意大利公投“自由至死”试图通过部分废除刑法第579条使安乐死合法化。尽管宪法裁决(第242/2019号和135/2024号)对严格条件下的协助自杀引入了有限的例外情况,但立法进展甚微。相比之下,一些欧洲国家——包括荷兰、比利时、卢森堡、西班牙和葡萄牙——已经制定了全面的法律来规范安乐死和/或协助自杀。其他国家,如德国、奥地利和瑞士,已经将协助自杀合法化,但对主动安乐死仍有限制。法国和英国最近的事态发展标志着法律格局的演变,而匈牙利和挪威等国则坚持禁止的立场。结果:文章批判性地检查了这些差异的伦理和医学法律含义,强调姑息治疗的作用和医生在临终决策中的责任。它突出表明,意大利需要采取一种更有组织的管理办法,在生命权和个人自决原则之间取得平衡。结论:研究结果表明,在整个欧洲的法律框架继续发展的同时,意大利必须重新考虑其僵化的法律立场,以解决临终关怀的复杂现实,确保对生命的保护和对个人自主权的尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinica Terapeutica
Clinica Terapeutica PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: La Clinica Terapeutica è una rivista di Clinica e Terapia in Medicina e Chirurgia, fondata nel 1951 dal Prof. Mariano Messini (1901-1980), Direttore dell''Istituto di Idrologia Medica dell''Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. La rivista è pubblicata come “periodico bimestrale” dalla Società Editrice Universo, casa editrice fondata nel 1945 dal Comm. Luigi Pellino. La Clinica Terapeutica è indicizzata su MEDLINE, INDEX MEDICUS, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信