Daniel Hagen, Emily Goldmann, Rebecca M Schwartz, Jacqueline Moline
{"title":"Unmet need for depression treatment before and after the affordable care act.","authors":"Daniel Hagen, Emily Goldmann, Rebecca M Schwartz, Jacqueline Moline","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-03000-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded access to depression screening and care. However, changes in unmet need for depression treatment and public mental health equity following ACA implementation remain understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 3,522 respondents to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2020 were used to examine changes in clinically significant depression symptoms that received neither with pharmacologic nor behavioral health treatment. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between time period (post-ACA, 2013-2020 vs. pre-ACA, 2005-2010) and unmet need for depression treatment, both overall and stratified by socio-demographic and health care-related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unmet need for depression treatment decreased from 56% in 2005-10 to 47% in 2013-20, with no significant differences by socio-demographic characteristics. After adjusting for covariates, this corresponded to a 14% reduction in unmet need post- vs. pre-ACA (prevalence ratio (PR) 0.86; CI 0.79,0.95). Only those reporting Medicare vs. another type of insurance coverage experienced a significant decrease in unmet need for depression treatment (PR 0.77; CI 0.60,0.99). A similar decrease in unmet need was observed regardless of having a regular point of care or not, but only detected among those who had used health care services in the prior year (PR 0.80; CI 0.70,0.92) vs. those who had not (PR 1.13; CI 0.92,1.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unmet need for depression treatment decreased after ACA implementation but remains common. Reductions in barriers to primary care visits and universal screening policies may further decrease unmet need for depression treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-03000-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded access to depression screening and care. However, changes in unmet need for depression treatment and public mental health equity following ACA implementation remain understudied.
Methods: Data from 3,522 respondents to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2020 were used to examine changes in clinically significant depression symptoms that received neither with pharmacologic nor behavioral health treatment. Modified Poisson regression models were used to estimate the association between time period (post-ACA, 2013-2020 vs. pre-ACA, 2005-2010) and unmet need for depression treatment, both overall and stratified by socio-demographic and health care-related variables.
Results: Unmet need for depression treatment decreased from 56% in 2005-10 to 47% in 2013-20, with no significant differences by socio-demographic characteristics. After adjusting for covariates, this corresponded to a 14% reduction in unmet need post- vs. pre-ACA (prevalence ratio (PR) 0.86; CI 0.79,0.95). Only those reporting Medicare vs. another type of insurance coverage experienced a significant decrease in unmet need for depression treatment (PR 0.77; CI 0.60,0.99). A similar decrease in unmet need was observed regardless of having a regular point of care or not, but only detected among those who had used health care services in the prior year (PR 0.80; CI 0.70,0.92) vs. those who had not (PR 1.13; CI 0.92,1.37).
Conclusion: Unmet need for depression treatment decreased after ACA implementation but remains common. Reductions in barriers to primary care visits and universal screening policies may further decrease unmet need for depression treatment.
目的:2010年平价医疗法案(ACA)扩大了抑郁症筛查和护理的覆盖面。然而,ACA实施后未满足的抑郁症治疗需求和公共心理健康公平的变化仍未得到充分研究。方法:利用2005年至2020年全国健康与营养调查(NHANES)的3522名受访者的数据,研究未接受药物和行为健康治疗的临床显著抑郁症状的变化。修正泊松回归模型用于估计时间段(aca后,2013-2020年与aca前,2005-2010年)与未满足的抑郁症治疗需求之间的关系,包括总体和按社会人口统计学和卫生保健相关变量分层的关系。结果:未满足的抑郁症治疗需求从2005-10年的56%下降到2013-20年的47%,社会人口统计学特征无显著差异。在调整协变量后,这相当于aca后未满足需求比aca前减少14%(患病率(PR) 0.86;可信区间0.79,0.95)。只有那些报告医疗保险与其他类型保险相比,未满足的抑郁症治疗需求显著减少(PR 0.77; CI 0.60,0.99)。无论是否有正规的护理点,未满足的需求都有类似的减少,但仅在前一年使用过卫生保健服务的人群中发现(PR 0.80; CI 0.70,0.92)与未使用过卫生保健服务的人群(PR 1.13; CI 0.92,1.37)。结论:ACA实施后,未满足的抑郁症治疗需求有所减少,但仍很常见。初级保健就诊障碍的减少和普遍筛查政策可能会进一步减少未满足的抑郁症治疗需求。
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.