Scoring system for emergency surgery in acute appendicitis patients.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Baolin Wang, Kexi Liao, Jianbo Dai, Jiexin Wu, Youxiang Guo, Zhanxiang Lei, Qing Zhao, Zhigang Wang, Yongfeng Zhang, Shuguo Zheng
{"title":"Scoring system for emergency surgery in acute appendicitis patients.","authors":"Baolin Wang, Kexi Liao, Jianbo Dai, Jiexin Wu, Youxiang Guo, Zhanxiang Lei, Qing Zhao, Zhigang Wang, Yongfeng Zhang, Shuguo Zheng","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-03110-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency appendectomy is no longer the only treatment option for uncomplicated appendicitis. Currently, there is no scoring system to determine whether acute appendicitis requires surgical intervention. This study aimed to develop a scoring system for emergency surgery in acute appendicitis (SESAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Acute appendicitis cases from five primary hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and imaging characteristics were selected for multivariate logistic regression analysis and transformed into a scoring system. A small-scale clinical case validation was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1788 cases were ultimately included, with 341 in the unnecessary operation group and 1447 in the necessary operation group. Based on clinical and imaging characteristics, a scoring system with a maximum score of 14 points was established. Patients with scores of 9 or above had a 91.9% likelihood of requiring emergency appendectomy, while 77.6% of those with scores of 4 or below could be managed with conservative treatment using antibiotics. A clinical case application test of 48 cases verified that the sensitivity and specificity of this scoring system were 94.8% and 63.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scoring system aids clinicians, particularly in primary hospitals, in rapidly identifying patients who require emergency appendectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03110-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency appendectomy is no longer the only treatment option for uncomplicated appendicitis. Currently, there is no scoring system to determine whether acute appendicitis requires surgical intervention. This study aimed to develop a scoring system for emergency surgery in acute appendicitis (SESAA).

Methods: Acute appendicitis cases from five primary hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and imaging characteristics were selected for multivariate logistic regression analysis and transformed into a scoring system. A small-scale clinical case validation was conducted.

Results: A total of 1788 cases were ultimately included, with 341 in the unnecessary operation group and 1447 in the necessary operation group. Based on clinical and imaging characteristics, a scoring system with a maximum score of 14 points was established. Patients with scores of 9 or above had a 91.9% likelihood of requiring emergency appendectomy, while 77.6% of those with scores of 4 or below could be managed with conservative treatment using antibiotics. A clinical case application test of 48 cases verified that the sensitivity and specificity of this scoring system were 94.8% and 63.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: The scoring system aids clinicians, particularly in primary hospitals, in rapidly identifying patients who require emergency appendectomy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性阑尾炎急诊手术评分系统。
简介:紧急阑尾切除术不再是治疗无并发症阑尾炎的唯一选择。目前,尚无评分系统来确定急性阑尾炎是否需要手术干预。本研究旨在建立急性阑尾炎急诊手术(SESAA)的评分系统。方法:对5家基层医院急性阑尾炎病例进行回顾性分析。选择临床和影像学特征进行多变量logistic回归分析并转化为评分系统。进行了小规模的临床病例验证。结果:最终纳入病例1788例,非必要手术组341例,必要手术组1447例。根据临床及影像学特点,建立评分体系,最高评分为14分。得分在9分及以上的患者有91.9%的可能性需要紧急阑尾切除术,而得分在4分及以下的患者中有77.6%的人可以使用抗生素进行保守治疗。经48例临床病例应用试验验证,该评分系统的敏感性为94.8%,特异性为63.6%。结论:该评分系统有助于临床医生,特别是基层医院的临床医生快速识别需要急诊阑尾切除术的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信