The Implementation of Knowledge Management in Health and Social Care Organisations as Assessed by Managers: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Eevi Karsikas, Merja Meriläinen, Kirsi Koivunen, Anna-Maria Tuomikoski, Outi Kanste
{"title":"The Implementation of Knowledge Management in Health and Social Care Organisations as Assessed by Managers: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Eevi Karsikas, Merja Meriläinen, Kirsi Koivunen, Anna-Maria Tuomikoski, Outi Kanste","doi":"10.1111/scs.70122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the implementation of knowledge management in health and social care organisations, as assessed by managers.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was used. Data were collected from all eligible managers of six Finnish public health and social care organisations (N = 649) using an electronic version of the Managers' Competence in Knowledge Management (MCKM) instrument in February and August 2022. The data included responses from 116 managers and were analysed using descriptive statistical methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Almost half of the managers reported that their organisations did not allocate sufficient resources to knowledge management or systematically map and assess staff competence, even though knowledge development was mentioned in almost all of the organisations' strategies. The results indicated a statistically significant difference between the work area and the clear definition of responsibilities in knowledge management and the utilisation of data to assess staff competence. In addition, a statistically significant difference was observed in the health and social care sector and between organisations' allocation of sufficient resources to knowledge management, the clear definition of responsibilities in knowledge management, and the systematic mapping of staff competences. The most used staff competence development methods included student mentoring, discussions, and familiarisation, while the least used were peer evaluation and study circles.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The results help identify weaknesses in the implementation of knowledge management, enabling more efficient resource allocation and competency development to improve organisational performance and ensure success.</p>","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":"39 3","pages":"e70122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.70122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the implementation of knowledge management in health and social care organisations, as assessed by managers.

Design/methodology/approach: A descriptive cross-sectional study was used. Data were collected from all eligible managers of six Finnish public health and social care organisations (N = 649) using an electronic version of the Managers' Competence in Knowledge Management (MCKM) instrument in February and August 2022. The data included responses from 116 managers and were analysed using descriptive statistical methods.

Findings: Almost half of the managers reported that their organisations did not allocate sufficient resources to knowledge management or systematically map and assess staff competence, even though knowledge development was mentioned in almost all of the organisations' strategies. The results indicated a statistically significant difference between the work area and the clear definition of responsibilities in knowledge management and the utilisation of data to assess staff competence. In addition, a statistically significant difference was observed in the health and social care sector and between organisations' allocation of sufficient resources to knowledge management, the clear definition of responsibilities in knowledge management, and the systematic mapping of staff competences. The most used staff competence development methods included student mentoring, discussions, and familiarisation, while the least used were peer evaluation and study circles.

Originality/value: The results help identify weaknesses in the implementation of knowledge management, enabling more efficient resource allocation and competency development to improve organisational performance and ensure success.

知识管理在卫生和社会护理组织的实施,由管理者评估:一项描述性横断面研究。
目的:描述由管理者评估的知识管理在卫生和社会保健组织中的实施情况。设计/方法/方法:采用描述性横断面研究。在2022年2月和8月,使用管理者知识管理能力(MCKM)工具的电子版本,从六个芬兰公共卫生和社会保健组织(N = 649)的所有合格管理者中收集数据。数据包括来自116名经理的回复,并使用描述性统计方法进行分析。研究结果:几乎一半的管理者报告说,他们的组织没有分配足够的资源来进行知识管理或系统地绘制和评估员工的能力,尽管几乎所有组织的战略都提到了知识发展。结果表明,在知识管理和利用数据评估员工能力方面,工作领域和责任的明确定义之间存在统计学上的显著差异。此外,在卫生和社会保健部门以及各组织为知识管理分配足够的资源、明确定义知识管理中的责任和系统地绘制员工能力之间,观察到统计上的显著差异。最常用的员工能力发展方法包括学生辅导、讨论和熟悉,而最少使用的是同行评估和学习圈。原创性/价值:研究结果有助找出实施知识管理的弱点,从而更有效地分配资源和发展能力,以改善组织的表现和确保成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信