The effectiveness of augmented reality handouts for learning microbiology in medical students.

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Nuntra Suwantarat, Sidayu Suriya, Vorawan Vanicharoenchai, Pongsagon Vichitvejpaisal, Kasana Raksamani
{"title":"The effectiveness of augmented reality handouts for learning microbiology in medical students.","authors":"Nuntra Suwantarat, Sidayu Suriya, Vorawan Vanicharoenchai, Pongsagon Vichitvejpaisal, Kasana Raksamani","doi":"10.1128/jmbe.00132-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluate the effectiveness of self-directed learning augmented reality (AR) handouts as learning materials for teaching microbiology to third-year medical students in the Doctor of Medicine (English Program) at Thammasat University. A stratified randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing academic performance (multiple-choice question scores), the motivation levels (motivated strategies for learning questionnaire, MSLQ), and satisfaction survey scores among students studying with AR handouts (intervention group) versus traditional handouts (control group). Twenty-four students participated in this study (<i>n</i> = 12 per group). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, total grade point average, or pre-test scores (mean of 5.08). Both groups demonstrated similar improvements in post-test scores, with means of 11.25 for the intervention group and 10.58 for the control group. However, MSLQ scores for intrinsic goal orientation were higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (5.73 vs 4.81, <i>P</i> = 0.002). Satisfaction survey scores, particularly in the categories of \"Handouts are stimulating\" and \"Handouts are exciting,\" were also higher in the intervention group than in the control group (4.58 vs 3.50, <i>P</i> = 0.025, and 4.42 vs 3.17, <i>P</i> = 0.019, respectively). AR handouts were effective in enhancing the learning of medical microbiology and infectious diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":46416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education","volume":" ","pages":"e0013225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00132-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluate the effectiveness of self-directed learning augmented reality (AR) handouts as learning materials for teaching microbiology to third-year medical students in the Doctor of Medicine (English Program) at Thammasat University. A stratified randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing academic performance (multiple-choice question scores), the motivation levels (motivated strategies for learning questionnaire, MSLQ), and satisfaction survey scores among students studying with AR handouts (intervention group) versus traditional handouts (control group). Twenty-four students participated in this study (n = 12 per group). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, total grade point average, or pre-test scores (mean of 5.08). Both groups demonstrated similar improvements in post-test scores, with means of 11.25 for the intervention group and 10.58 for the control group. However, MSLQ scores for intrinsic goal orientation were higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (5.73 vs 4.81, P = 0.002). Satisfaction survey scores, particularly in the categories of "Handouts are stimulating" and "Handouts are exciting," were also higher in the intervention group than in the control group (4.58 vs 3.50, P = 0.025, and 4.42 vs 3.17, P = 0.019, respectively). AR handouts were effective in enhancing the learning of medical microbiology and infectious diseases.

增强现实讲义在医学生微生物学学习中的有效性。
我们评估了自主学习增强现实(AR)讲义作为法政大学医学博士(英语课程)三年级医学生微生物学教学的学习材料的有效性。通过分层随机对照试验,比较了使用AR讲义(干预组)和使用传统讲义(对照组)的学生的学习成绩(选择题得分)、动机水平(学习动机策略问卷,MSLQ)和满意度调查得分。24名学生参加了本研究(每组12人)。两组在年龄、性别、平均总绩点或测试前分数(平均5.08分)方面没有显著差异。两组在测试后得分上都有类似的改善,干预组平均为11.25分,对照组平均为10.58分。干预组内在目标取向的MSLQ得分高于对照组(5.73比4.81,P = 0.002)。满意度调查得分,特别是在“讲义令人兴奋”和“讲义令人兴奋”两个类别中,干预组的满意度调查得分也高于对照组(分别为4.58比3.50,P = 0.025和4.42比3.17,P = 0.019)。AR讲义在加强医学微生物学和传染病的学习方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
26.30%
发文量
95
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信