Efficacy and Safety of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) in Patients with Psychosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.2 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Omnia M Ahmed, Gehad Khalaf, Khalid Radwan Alsaadany, Ayman Zaroug, Ahmed Hatem Ibrahim, Hafsat Nasir, Shrouk M Elghazaly
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) in Patients with Psychosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Omnia M Ahmed, Gehad Khalaf, Khalid Radwan Alsaadany, Ayman Zaroug, Ahmed Hatem Ibrahim, Hafsat Nasir, Shrouk M Elghazaly","doi":"10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence regarding the multifactorial etiology of psychosis suggests that it can be trauma-induced. Therefore, there is a growing interest in using trauma-focused interventions to treat patients with psychosis and a history of traumatic events. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an approved, effective therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but its use in the presence of psychotic features is still under scrutiny.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the safety of EMDR in individuals with psychosis and co-morbid PTSD and evaluate its effectiveness in reducing psychotic and trauma-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from six databases using an extensive search strategy. Eligible studies were identified based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then quality was assessed. Data was extracted from each study and narratively synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>: Four RCTs were included in our review, with an additional report for one. EMDR was generally superior to TAU and the WL condition in improving symptoms of psychosis and PTSD. It led to consistent improvements in clinician and patient-rated PTSD symptoms and was particularly effective in reducing psychotic negative symptoms (PANSS-N) and paranoid thinking (GPTS). However, improvements in delusions and auditory hallucinations (PSYRATS-D and AH) were mostly insignificant. No serious adverse events related to the therapy itself were reported in any of the trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, EMDR promises to be a safe and effective therapy in people with psychosis and PTSD. Large-scale trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46305,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2025-1099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence regarding the multifactorial etiology of psychosis suggests that it can be trauma-induced. Therefore, there is a growing interest in using trauma-focused interventions to treat patients with psychosis and a history of traumatic events. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) is an approved, effective therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but its use in the presence of psychotic features is still under scrutiny.

Objectives: To assess the safety of EMDR in individuals with psychosis and co-morbid PTSD and evaluate its effectiveness in reducing psychotic and trauma-related symptoms.

Methods: Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from six databases using an extensive search strategy. Eligible studies were identified based on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then quality was assessed. Data was extracted from each study and narratively synthesized.

Results: : Four RCTs were included in our review, with an additional report for one. EMDR was generally superior to TAU and the WL condition in improving symptoms of psychosis and PTSD. It led to consistent improvements in clinician and patient-rated PTSD symptoms and was particularly effective in reducing psychotic negative symptoms (PANSS-N) and paranoid thinking (GPTS). However, improvements in delusions and auditory hallucinations (PSYRATS-D and AH) were mostly insignificant. No serious adverse events related to the therapy itself were reported in any of the trials.

Conclusion: Overall, EMDR promises to be a safe and effective therapy in people with psychosis and PTSD. Large-scale trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm our findings.

精神病患者眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
背景:最近关于精神病的多因素病因的证据表明,它可能是创伤引起的。因此,人们对使用创伤干预来治疗精神病和创伤事件史的患者越来越感兴趣。眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)是一种被批准的有效治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的方法,但它在精神病特征存在时的应用仍在审查中。目的:评估EMDR在精神病和合并PTSD患者中的安全性,并评估其在减轻精神病和创伤相关症状方面的有效性。方法:采用广泛的检索策略,从六个数据库中获得相关的随机对照试验(rct)。根据我们的纳入和排除标准确定符合条件的研究,然后评估质量。从每个研究中提取数据并进行叙述性综合。结果:我们的综述纳入了4项随机对照试验,其中1项为附加报告。EMDR在改善精神病和创伤后应激障碍症状方面普遍优于TAU和WL。它导致临床医生和患者评价的创伤后应激障碍症状的持续改善,并在减少精神病性阴性症状(PANSS-N)和偏执思维(GPTS)方面特别有效。然而,妄想和幻听(PSYRATS-D和AH)的改善大多不显著。在任何试验中均未报告与治疗本身相关的严重不良事件。结论:总的来说,EMDR有望成为一种安全有效的治疗精神病和创伤后应激障碍的方法。需要更长的随访期的大规模试验来证实我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信