Critical appraisal of an original research article.

IF 0.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sham Santhanam, Vinod Ravindran, Chris Wincup
{"title":"Critical appraisal of an original research article.","authors":"Sham Santhanam, Vinod Ravindran, Chris Wincup","doi":"10.1177/14782715251369964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical appraisal of evidence involves carefully evaluating a study's validity, reliability, applicability and generalisability. It is essential for all clinicians and those involved in academic publishing. A manuscript must adhere to two sets of standards. First, reporting guidelines ensure uniformity, transparency and clarity. Then, critical appraisal tools or criteria assess the study's methodological robustness. The manuscript may undergo a preliminary screening before we initiate the critical appraisal process. The foremost criterion is evaluating the journal's quality, assessing the study topic, design and sample size, and checking if the study objectives and outcome measures have been clearly stated. An original study is typically presented in the standard 'IMRaD' format, with each section addressing a specific set of questions. The primary purpose of the 'Introduction' section is to justify the study's objective. The 'Methods' section is crucial to the manuscript. It aids in assessing the validity of the research, describes the critical parameters in a study protocol and ensures the study's replicability. The main components covered in the 'Methods' section include the study question, design, population, sample size, outcome measures, statistical analysis and details of ethics approval. The 'Results' section should discuss the study's findings, which are outlined in the objectives. The 'Discussion' section covers the implications of the study, which should be balanced, and the interpretation in this section should align with the reported results. The validity of a study is nothing but its closeness to the truth, that is, the extent to which the results are accurate and free from bias. Hence, minimising this chance of bias in a study makes it more valid. Internal validity generally reflects a study's methodological robustness, and external validity reflects the generalisability or applicability. In this era of evidence-based medicine, critical appraisal becomes necessary as people always discuss practising it in their daily clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","volume":" ","pages":"14782715251369964"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715251369964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical appraisal of evidence involves carefully evaluating a study's validity, reliability, applicability and generalisability. It is essential for all clinicians and those involved in academic publishing. A manuscript must adhere to two sets of standards. First, reporting guidelines ensure uniformity, transparency and clarity. Then, critical appraisal tools or criteria assess the study's methodological robustness. The manuscript may undergo a preliminary screening before we initiate the critical appraisal process. The foremost criterion is evaluating the journal's quality, assessing the study topic, design and sample size, and checking if the study objectives and outcome measures have been clearly stated. An original study is typically presented in the standard 'IMRaD' format, with each section addressing a specific set of questions. The primary purpose of the 'Introduction' section is to justify the study's objective. The 'Methods' section is crucial to the manuscript. It aids in assessing the validity of the research, describes the critical parameters in a study protocol and ensures the study's replicability. The main components covered in the 'Methods' section include the study question, design, population, sample size, outcome measures, statistical analysis and details of ethics approval. The 'Results' section should discuss the study's findings, which are outlined in the objectives. The 'Discussion' section covers the implications of the study, which should be balanced, and the interpretation in this section should align with the reported results. The validity of a study is nothing but its closeness to the truth, that is, the extent to which the results are accurate and free from bias. Hence, minimising this chance of bias in a study makes it more valid. Internal validity generally reflects a study's methodological robustness, and external validity reflects the generalisability or applicability. In this era of evidence-based medicine, critical appraisal becomes necessary as people always discuss practising it in their daily clinical practice.

对一篇原创研究文章的批判性评价。
证据的批判性评估包括仔细评估研究的有效性、可靠性、适用性和概括性。这对所有临床医生和那些参与学术出版的人都是必不可少的。一份手稿必须遵守两套标准。首先,报告准则确保统一、透明和清晰。然后,关键的评估工具或标准评估研究方法的稳健性。在我们开始关键的评估过程之前,稿件可能会经过初步筛选。最重要的标准是评估期刊的质量,评估研究主题,设计和样本量,检查研究目标和结果测量是否已经明确说明。原始研究通常以标准的“IMRaD”格式呈现,每个部分解决一组特定的问题。“引言”部分的主要目的是证明研究的目的。“方法”部分对手稿至关重要。它有助于评估研究的有效性,描述研究方案中的关键参数,并确保研究的可重复性。“方法”部分涵盖的主要内容包括研究问题、设计、人口、样本量、结果测量、统计分析和伦理批准的细节。“结果”部分应该讨论研究的发现,这些发现在目标中概述。“讨论”部分涵盖了研究的影响,这应该是平衡的,这部分的解释应该与报告的结果保持一致。一项研究的有效性只不过是它与事实的接近程度,也就是说,结果准确和不受偏见影响的程度。因此,在研究中尽量减少这种偏倚的可能性会使其更有效。内部效度通常反映研究方法的稳健性,外部效度反映研究的普遍性或适用性。在这个循证医学的时代,人们总是在日常临床实践中讨论批判性评估,因此批判性评估变得必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (JRCPE) is the College’s quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, with an international circulation of 8,000. It has three main emphases – clinical medicine, education and medical history. The online JRCPE provides full access to the contents of the print journal and has a number of additional features including advance online publication of recently accepted papers, an online archive, online-only papers, online symposia abstracts, and a series of topic-specific supplements, primarily based on the College’s consensus conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信