[Trauma-focused treatments in people with personality disorders: comments on the evidence and on often-heard claims].

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
J Hutsebaut, L M C van den Bosch
{"title":"[Trauma-focused treatments in people with personality disorders: comments on the evidence and on often-heard claims].","authors":"J Hutsebaut, L M C van den Bosch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For several years, especially in the Netherlands, there has been a lot of attention for the use of trauma-focused treatments, such as EMDR, in the treatment of personality disorders. Trauma-focused treatments are said to be shorter, more directly focused on the etiology of the personality disorder and less stigmatizing. What evidence do we have for the role of trauma-focused treatment and how should that evidence be interpreted?</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To discuss and interpret in a balanced way the evidence for the role of trauma treatment in people with personality disorder and to discuss some comments on the commonly made distinction between trauma-focused and personality disorder treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pragmatic literature search was conducted and the results were placed in the context of the broader evidence in the treatment of personality disorders RESULTS: Trauma-focused treatments show positive treatment outcomes for a subset of people with personality disorder. There is no evidence that those outcomes are better than the outcomes of other brief treatments, nor is there evidence that these studies show that people truly recover from personality disorder in the broader sense.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Short-term treatments, including trauma-focused treatments, can achieve important positive outcomes in people with personality disorder in the short term. Perhaps the active mechanisms behind trauma-focused treatment are not fundamentally different from the working mechanisms behind personality disorder treatment. In this regard, one of the most important aspects is that people can actively relate to their history. Also, as professionals, we must be careful not to paint clients too rosy a picture of the possible outcomes of brief treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 7","pages":"393-398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: For several years, especially in the Netherlands, there has been a lot of attention for the use of trauma-focused treatments, such as EMDR, in the treatment of personality disorders. Trauma-focused treatments are said to be shorter, more directly focused on the etiology of the personality disorder and less stigmatizing. What evidence do we have for the role of trauma-focused treatment and how should that evidence be interpreted?

Aim: To discuss and interpret in a balanced way the evidence for the role of trauma treatment in people with personality disorder and to discuss some comments on the commonly made distinction between trauma-focused and personality disorder treatment.

Method: A pragmatic literature search was conducted and the results were placed in the context of the broader evidence in the treatment of personality disorders RESULTS: Trauma-focused treatments show positive treatment outcomes for a subset of people with personality disorder. There is no evidence that those outcomes are better than the outcomes of other brief treatments, nor is there evidence that these studies show that people truly recover from personality disorder in the broader sense.

Conclusion: Short-term treatments, including trauma-focused treatments, can achieve important positive outcomes in people with personality disorder in the short term. Perhaps the active mechanisms behind trauma-focused treatment are not fundamentally different from the working mechanisms behind personality disorder treatment. In this regard, one of the most important aspects is that people can actively relate to their history. Also, as professionals, we must be careful not to paint clients too rosy a picture of the possible outcomes of brief treatments.

[人格障碍患者的创伤治疗:对证据和经常听到的说法的评论]。
背景:几年来,特别是在荷兰,人们对创伤治疗(如EMDR)在人格障碍治疗中的应用给予了很多关注。据说,以创伤为重点的治疗时间更短,更直接地关注人格障碍的病因,更少的污名化。我们有什么证据证明创伤治疗的作用?这些证据应该如何解释?目的:以平衡的方式讨论和解释创伤治疗在人格障碍患者中的作用的证据,并讨论一些关于创伤治疗和人格障碍治疗之间普遍存在的区别的评论。方法:进行了实用的文献检索,并将结果置于人格障碍治疗的更广泛证据的背景下。结果:以创伤为重点的治疗对一小部分人格障碍患者显示出积极的治疗效果。没有证据表明这些结果比其他短期治疗的结果好,也没有证据表明这些研究表明人们真正从广义上的人格障碍中恢复过来。结论:短期治疗,包括以创伤为重点的治疗,可以在短期内对人格障碍患者取得重要的积极结果。也许以创伤为中心的治疗背后的积极机制与人格障碍治疗背后的工作机制并没有根本的不同。在这方面,最重要的一个方面是人们可以积极地与他们的历史联系起来。此外,作为专业人士,我们必须小心,不要让客户对短暂治疗的可能结果过于乐观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信