Kathleen M Lehman, Savannah R Saboda, Kim R Love, Kursten V Pierce
{"title":"Radiation Exposure During Contrast-Enhanced Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies in Dogs and Cats.","authors":"Kathleen M Lehman, Savannah R Saboda, Kim R Love, Kursten V Pierce","doi":"10.1111/vru.70084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopic swallow studies are considered the gold standard diagnostic for determining underlying etiologies of dysphagia. Swallow studies are commonly performed procedures utilizing fluoroscopy in which personnel are exposed to ionizing radiation. The study objective was to document radiation exposure to individual personnel involved in performing gastrointestinal swallow studies in dogs and cats, compare radiation exposure based on the localization of disease, and evaluate radiation exposure based on the experience (i.e., year of training) of the diagnostic imaging resident. This prospective observational study population was comprised of 61 client-owned animals, 58 dogs and 3 cats, presenting to a university teaching hospital over 8 months. Dose was evaluated for positions/roles: position 1 (personnel feeding/at patient head), position 2/3 (restraining), and position 4 (image acquisition). Patient characteristics, diagnosis(es), fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and personnel positions were recorded. A linear mixed effects model was utilized for statistical analysis. Radiation dose based on anatomic disease location (e.g., cricopharyngeal, esophageal, gastroesophageal, none) was not statistically significant (p = .438). Th effect of personnel position (p < .001) and fluoroscopy time (p = .005) was statistically significant. The lowest median radiation dose was for personnel acquiring images (position 4), estimated at 16.38 µSv. The highest median radiation dose was for personnel feeding patients (position 1), estimated at 48.13 µSv. Unsurprisingly, personnel positioned closer to the radiation source during contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopic swallow studies were exposed to higher radiation doses. Personnel should be aware of this occupational hazard. Rotation of personnel roles (e.g., feeding, restraining, image acquisition) should be considered to limit dose to specific personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":23581,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","volume":"66 5","pages":"e70084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.70084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopic swallow studies are considered the gold standard diagnostic for determining underlying etiologies of dysphagia. Swallow studies are commonly performed procedures utilizing fluoroscopy in which personnel are exposed to ionizing radiation. The study objective was to document radiation exposure to individual personnel involved in performing gastrointestinal swallow studies in dogs and cats, compare radiation exposure based on the localization of disease, and evaluate radiation exposure based on the experience (i.e., year of training) of the diagnostic imaging resident. This prospective observational study population was comprised of 61 client-owned animals, 58 dogs and 3 cats, presenting to a university teaching hospital over 8 months. Dose was evaluated for positions/roles: position 1 (personnel feeding/at patient head), position 2/3 (restraining), and position 4 (image acquisition). Patient characteristics, diagnosis(es), fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and personnel positions were recorded. A linear mixed effects model was utilized for statistical analysis. Radiation dose based on anatomic disease location (e.g., cricopharyngeal, esophageal, gastroesophageal, none) was not statistically significant (p = .438). Th effect of personnel position (p < .001) and fluoroscopy time (p = .005) was statistically significant. The lowest median radiation dose was for personnel acquiring images (position 4), estimated at 16.38 µSv. The highest median radiation dose was for personnel feeding patients (position 1), estimated at 48.13 µSv. Unsurprisingly, personnel positioned closer to the radiation source during contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopic swallow studies were exposed to higher radiation doses. Personnel should be aware of this occupational hazard. Rotation of personnel roles (e.g., feeding, restraining, image acquisition) should be considered to limit dose to specific personnel.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is a bimonthly, international, peer-reviewed, research journal devoted to the fields of veterinary diagnostic imaging and radiation oncology. Established in 1958, it is owned by the American College of Veterinary Radiology and is also the official journal for six affiliate veterinary organizations. Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is represented on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, World Association of Medical Editors, and Committee on Publication Ethics.
The mission of Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound is to serve as a leading resource for high quality articles that advance scientific knowledge and standards of clinical practice in the areas of veterinary diagnostic radiology, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, nuclear imaging, radiation oncology, and interventional radiology. Manuscript types include original investigations, imaging diagnosis reports, review articles, editorials and letters to the Editor. Acceptance criteria include originality, significance, quality, reader interest, composition and adherence to author guidelines.