[Liothyronine augmentation in depression].

Q4 Medicine
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Pub Date : 2025-01-01
A Post, J H Hoogeveen
{"title":"[Liothyronine augmentation in depression].","authors":"A Post, J H Hoogeveen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The revised Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline for Depression recommends liothyronine (T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span>) augmentation to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as one of several third-line treatment options for moderate to severe depression, the others being lithium and atypical antipsychotics. The guideline refers to two network meta-analyses demonstrating efficacy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the evidence for efficacy of T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span> augmentation to SSRIs in depression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A PubMed and Cochrane Central search was conducted for controlled trials investigating T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span> added to an SSRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were identified, three assessing augmentation and four examining co-initiation. Among the augmentation studies, only one was placebo-controlled and found no significant T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span> effect. Of the two active-controlled trials, one open-label study suggested better efficacy than lithium, while the other did not specify whether T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span> or T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">4</span> was used (dose suggested T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">4</span>) and showed similar efficacy to other augmentation options. The co-initiation trials reported conflicting results, ranging from better outcomes with T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span> to no difference or trend toward worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span> augmentation to an SSRI is not yet sufficiently established. Network meta-analyses are based primarily on active-controlled studies. Given the potential role of T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span>, a long-term, placebo-controlled trial is needed to clarify the effectiveness of T<span class=\"SubScript _idGenCharOverride-1\">3</span> augmentation to an SSRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23100,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","volume":"67 7","pages":"387-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The revised Dutch Multidisciplinary Guideline for Depression recommends liothyronine (T3) augmentation to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as one of several third-line treatment options for moderate to severe depression, the others being lithium and atypical antipsychotics. The guideline refers to two network meta-analyses demonstrating efficacy.

Aim: To evaluate the evidence for efficacy of T3 augmentation to SSRIs in depression.

Method: A PubMed and Cochrane Central search was conducted for controlled trials investigating T3 added to an SSRI.

Results: Seven studies were identified, three assessing augmentation and four examining co-initiation. Among the augmentation studies, only one was placebo-controlled and found no significant T3 effect. Of the two active-controlled trials, one open-label study suggested better efficacy than lithium, while the other did not specify whether T3 or T4 was used (dose suggested T4) and showed similar efficacy to other augmentation options. The co-initiation trials reported conflicting results, ranging from better outcomes with T3 to no difference or trend toward worse outcomes.

Conclusion: The efficacy of T3 augmentation to an SSRI is not yet sufficiently established. Network meta-analyses are based primarily on active-controlled studies. Given the potential role of T3, a long-term, placebo-controlled trial is needed to clarify the effectiveness of T3 augmentation to an SSRI.

[抑郁症中碘甲状腺原氨酸的增加]。
背景:修订后的荷兰抑郁症多学科指南推荐碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)增强选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)作为中重度抑郁症的几种三线治疗方案之一,其他是锂和非典型抗精神病药物。该指南引用了两个网络荟萃分析来证明其有效性。目的:评价T3增强SSRIs治疗抑郁症疗效的证据。方法:PubMed和Cochrane Central检索了研究T3加SSRI的对照试验。结果:确定了7项研究,3项评估增强,4项检查共同起始。在增强研究中,只有一项是安慰剂对照,没有发现显著的T3效应。在两项主动对照试验中,一项开放标签研究表明疗效优于锂,而另一项没有指定是使用T3还是T4(剂量建议T4),并显示出与其他增强方案相似的疗效。联合启动试验报告了相互矛盾的结果,从T3的更好结果到没有差异或有更差结果的趋势。结论:T3增加对SSRI的疗效尚未充分确定。网络荟萃分析主要基于主动对照研究。考虑到T3的潜在作用,需要一项长期的安慰剂对照试验来阐明增加T3对SSRI的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie
Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信