Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography biomarkers of the choriocapillaris for objective detection of early diabetic retinopathy.

IF 1.2 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-25-00067
Zaara Haque, Albert Kofi Dadzie, Mansour Abtahi, Behrouz Ebrahimi, Tobiloba Adejumo, Taeyoon Son, Jennifer I Lim, Xincheng Yao
{"title":"Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography biomarkers of the choriocapillaris for objective detection of early diabetic retinopathy.","authors":"Zaara Haque, Albert Kofi Dadzie, Mansour Abtahi, Behrouz Ebrahimi, Tobiloba Adejumo, Taeyoon Son, Jennifer I Lim, Xincheng Yao","doi":"10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-25-00067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) biomarkers from the choriocapillaris (CC) for detecting early microvascular changes associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 191 macular OCTA images were analyzed from 78 healthy eyes, 64 eyes from diabetic individuals without clinical signs of DR (NoDR), and 49 eyes with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR). Five CC biomarkers were extracted from 6 mm × 6 mm enface OCTA images: flow deficit density (FDD), FD number (FDN), mean FD size (MFDS), perfusion intensity density (PID), and normalized blood flow index (NBFI). Flow maps were binarized using Phansalkar local thresholding, and statistical comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance and two-sample t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All five biomarkers demonstrated significant differences across study groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). FDD and MFDS were significantly elevated in both NoDR and mild NPDR eyes compared to controls, indicating increased nonperfusion and enlargement of flow voids. FDN decreased with disease severity, indicating spatial consolidation of capillary loss. PID and NBFI, which reflect flow signal intensity, also declined in diabetic eyes, suggesting a reduction in overall CC perfusion consistent with early vascular compromise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quantitative OCTA biomarkers of the CC reveal early microvascular changes in diabetic eyes. Among them, FDN and MFDS demonstrated the highest sensitivity to early disease progression. These findings support the use of CC-derived OCTA features as potential imaging biomarkers for detecting and monitoring early diabetic microvascular dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":44978,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"15 3","pages":"428-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-25-00067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate quantitative optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) biomarkers from the choriocapillaris (CC) for detecting early microvascular changes associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 191 macular OCTA images were analyzed from 78 healthy eyes, 64 eyes from diabetic individuals without clinical signs of DR (NoDR), and 49 eyes with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR). Five CC biomarkers were extracted from 6 mm × 6 mm enface OCTA images: flow deficit density (FDD), FD number (FDN), mean FD size (MFDS), perfusion intensity density (PID), and normalized blood flow index (NBFI). Flow maps were binarized using Phansalkar local thresholding, and statistical comparisons were performed using one-way analysis of variance and two-sample t-tests.

Results: All five biomarkers demonstrated significant differences across study groups (P < 0.001). FDD and MFDS were significantly elevated in both NoDR and mild NPDR eyes compared to controls, indicating increased nonperfusion and enlargement of flow voids. FDN decreased with disease severity, indicating spatial consolidation of capillary loss. PID and NBFI, which reflect flow signal intensity, also declined in diabetic eyes, suggesting a reduction in overall CC perfusion consistent with early vascular compromise.

Conclusion: Quantitative OCTA biomarkers of the CC reveal early microvascular changes in diabetic eyes. Among them, FDN and MFDS demonstrated the highest sensitivity to early disease progression. These findings support the use of CC-derived OCTA features as potential imaging biomarkers for detecting and monitoring early diabetic microvascular dysfunction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

定量光学相干断层扫描血管造影生物标志物的绒毛膜毛细血管客观检测早期糖尿病视网膜病变。
目的:评价定量光学相干断层扫描(OCT)血管造影(OCTA)生物标志物在绒毛膜毛细血管(CC)早期微血管病变检测中的应用价值。材料与方法:本研究回顾性分析了78只健康眼、64只无临床体征的糖尿病患者(NoDR)和49只轻度非增生性DR (NPDR)的191张黄斑OCTA图像。从6mm × 6mm面OCTA图像中提取5个CC生物标志物:血流缺陷密度(FDD)、FD数(FDN)、平均FD大小(MFDS)、灌注强度密度(PID)和标准化血流指数(NBFI)。采用Phansalkar局部阈值法对流程图进行二值化处理,采用单因素方差分析和双样本t检验进行统计比较。结果:所有五种生物标志物在研究组之间均有显著差异(P < 0.001)。与对照组相比,NoDR和轻度NPDR眼的FDD和MFDS均显著升高,表明非灌注增加和流腔增大。FDN随疾病严重程度降低,表明毛细血管损失的空间实变。反映血流信号强度的PID和NBFI在糖尿病眼中也有所下降,表明整体CC灌注减少与早期血管受损一致。结论:CC的定量OCTA生物标志物揭示了糖尿病眼早期微血管的变化。其中,FDN和MFDS对疾病早期进展的敏感性最高。这些发现支持使用cc衍生的OCTA特征作为检测和监测早期糖尿病微血管功能障碍的潜在成像生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信