Do unto others: People use similar strategies to regulate their own emotions and the emotions of others.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Emotion Pub Date : 2025-09-22 DOI:10.1037/emo0001587
Shir Ginosar Yaari, Lisanne Pauw, Anne Milek, Yaakov Greenwald, Dana Katsoty, Katharine H Greenaway, Maya Tamir
{"title":"Do unto others: People use similar strategies to regulate their own emotions and the emotions of others.","authors":"Shir Ginosar Yaari, Lisanne Pauw, Anne Milek, Yaakov Greenwald, Dana Katsoty, Katharine H Greenaway, Maya Tamir","doi":"10.1037/emo0001587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Do people use similar strategies to regulate their own emotions (i.e., intrapersonal or self-oriented emotion regulation) and to regulate the emotions of others (i.e., interpersonal or other-oriented emotion regulation)? By answering this question, we try to shed light on why people regulate the emotions of others the way they do. We reasoned that because people imagine themselves as the target when deciding how to regulate others' emotions (Ball et al., 2013), they would use similar emotion regulation strategies to regulate their own and targets' emotions (Hypothesis 1). People are more likely to imagine a target is similar to them, the better their relationship is with the target (e.g., Murray et al., 2002). Thus, we expected people who have better relationships with the target to use more similar emotion regulation strategies to regulate their own and the target's emotions (Hypothesis 2). To test these ideas, we ran a cross-cultural study (Study 1, <i>N</i><sub>participants</sub> = 3,960, 19 countries), a survey study on close relationships during wartime (Study 2, <i>N</i><sub>participants</sub> = 530) and an ecological momentary assessment study on close relationships in daily life (Study 3, <i>N</i><sub>participants</sub> = 136). Across all studies, we found that people used similar emotion regulation strategies to regulate their own emotions and the emotions of others. In Studies 2 and 3, we further found that people do so to a greater extent when they felt their relationship with the target was better. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48417,"journal":{"name":"Emotion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Do people use similar strategies to regulate their own emotions (i.e., intrapersonal or self-oriented emotion regulation) and to regulate the emotions of others (i.e., interpersonal or other-oriented emotion regulation)? By answering this question, we try to shed light on why people regulate the emotions of others the way they do. We reasoned that because people imagine themselves as the target when deciding how to regulate others' emotions (Ball et al., 2013), they would use similar emotion regulation strategies to regulate their own and targets' emotions (Hypothesis 1). People are more likely to imagine a target is similar to them, the better their relationship is with the target (e.g., Murray et al., 2002). Thus, we expected people who have better relationships with the target to use more similar emotion regulation strategies to regulate their own and the target's emotions (Hypothesis 2). To test these ideas, we ran a cross-cultural study (Study 1, Nparticipants = 3,960, 19 countries), a survey study on close relationships during wartime (Study 2, Nparticipants = 530) and an ecological momentary assessment study on close relationships in daily life (Study 3, Nparticipants = 136). Across all studies, we found that people used similar emotion regulation strategies to regulate their own emotions and the emotions of others. In Studies 2 and 3, we further found that people do so to a greater extent when they felt their relationship with the target was better. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

对待他人:人们使用类似的策略来调节自己的情绪和他人的情绪。
人们是否使用类似的策略来调节自己的情绪(即,人际或自我导向的情绪调节)和调节他人的情绪(即,人际或他人导向的情绪调节)?通过回答这个问题,我们试图阐明为什么人们会以自己的方式调节他人的情绪。我们推断,由于人们在决定如何调节他人情绪时把自己想象成目标(Ball et al., 2013),他们会使用类似的情绪调节策略来调节自己和目标的情绪(假设1)。人们与目标的关系越好,就越容易想象目标与自己相似(例如,Murray et al., 2002)。因此,我们预期与被试关系较好的人会使用更多相似的情绪调节策略来调节自己和被试的情绪(假设2)。为了验证这些观点,我们进行了一项跨文化研究(研究1,n参与者= 3,960,19个国家),一项关于战时亲密关系的调查研究(研究2,n参与者= 530)和一项关于日常生活中亲密关系的生态瞬间评估研究(研究3,n参与者= 136)。在所有的研究中,我们发现人们使用类似的情绪调节策略来调节自己和他人的情绪。在研究2和3中,我们进一步发现,当人们觉得自己与目标的关系更好时,他们会更大程度地这样做。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emotion
Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
325
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Emotion publishes significant contributions to the study of emotion from a wide range of theoretical traditions and research domains. The journal includes articles that advance knowledge and theory about all aspects of emotional processes, including reports of substantial empirical studies, scholarly reviews, and major theoretical articles. Submissions from all domains of emotion research are encouraged, including studies focusing on cultural, social, temperament and personality, cognitive, developmental, health, or biological variables that affect or are affected by emotional functioning. Both laboratory and field studies are appropriate for the journal, as are neuroimaging studies of emotional processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信