Promoting and Supporting Positive Conversations and Knowledge Mobilisation About Organ Donation in NHS Staff: a Hashtag "#" Series of Projects.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2025.15131
Natalie L Clark, Dorothy Coe, Hannah Gillespie, Marcus Diamond, Michael O'Malley, David Reaich, Caroline Wroe
{"title":"Promoting and Supporting Positive Conversations and Knowledge Mobilisation About Organ Donation in NHS Staff: a Hashtag \"#\" Series of Projects.","authors":"Natalie L Clark, Dorothy Coe, Hannah Gillespie, Marcus Diamond, Michael O'Malley, David Reaich, Caroline Wroe","doi":"10.3389/ti.2025.15131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implementation of the \"soft\" opt-out legislation in England has not had the desired impact in increasing the number of deceased donations and consent. The need for organs continues to be greater than the number of organs available, consent rates have fallen and organ donor registrations have stagnated. Introducing the legislation during the pandemic has had a profound effect with public awareness campaigns withheld, leaving a significant proportion of the population unaware of the change. Strategies to increase the public's awareness and understanding of organ donation and the opt-out legislation are needed, as well as to encourage decision-making and sharing this with their families. We outline several \"#\" projects (#conversations, #options, #speak) with NHS staff to demonstrate how we can successfully utilise this specific population as trusted individuals and advocates to promote positive communications about organ donation and the opt-out legislation. NHS England is one of the biggest employers and most ethnically diverse across Europe. We know that NHS staff are more supportive, more aware and are more likely to have made an organ donation decision and had conversations with their families than the public. This places them in a unique and valuable position to lead positive conversations about organ donation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"38 ","pages":"15131"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2025.15131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Implementation of the "soft" opt-out legislation in England has not had the desired impact in increasing the number of deceased donations and consent. The need for organs continues to be greater than the number of organs available, consent rates have fallen and organ donor registrations have stagnated. Introducing the legislation during the pandemic has had a profound effect with public awareness campaigns withheld, leaving a significant proportion of the population unaware of the change. Strategies to increase the public's awareness and understanding of organ donation and the opt-out legislation are needed, as well as to encourage decision-making and sharing this with their families. We outline several "#" projects (#conversations, #options, #speak) with NHS staff to demonstrate how we can successfully utilise this specific population as trusted individuals and advocates to promote positive communications about organ donation and the opt-out legislation. NHS England is one of the biggest employers and most ethnically diverse across Europe. We know that NHS staff are more supportive, more aware and are more likely to have made an organ donation decision and had conversations with their families than the public. This places them in a unique and valuable position to lead positive conversations about organ donation.

促进和支持NHS员工关于器官捐赠的积极对话和知识动员:一个标签“#”系列项目。
在英格兰,“软”选择退出立法的实施并没有对增加死者捐赠和同意的数量产生预期的影响。对器官的需求仍然大于可用器官的数量,同意率下降,器官捐献者登记停滞不前。在大流行病期间通过立法产生了深远的影响,公众宣传活动被搁置,使很大一部分人口不知道这种变化。我们需要制定策略,提高公众对器官捐赠和选择退出立法的认识和理解,并鼓励他们做出决定,并与家人分享。我们概述了与NHS工作人员的几个“#”项目(#对话,#选择,#说话),以展示我们如何成功地利用这一特定人群作为值得信赖的个人和倡导者,促进有关器官捐赠和选择退出立法的积极沟通。英国国民医疗服务体系是欧洲最大的雇主之一,也是欧洲种族最多样化的机构之一。我们知道,NHS的工作人员比公众更支持、更有意识,更有可能做出器官捐赠的决定,更有可能与家人交谈。这使他们处于一个独特而有价值的位置,可以引导有关器官捐赠的积极对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信