Animacy effect in the mnemonic advantage: A three-level meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Shi Cheng, Xiaomei Zhao, Xiaohui Yang, Yaning Liu
{"title":"Animacy effect in the mnemonic advantage: A three-level meta-analysis.","authors":"Shi Cheng, Xiaomei Zhao, Xiaohui Yang, Yaning Liu","doi":"10.3758/s13423-025-02737-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last decade, the animacy effect has emerged as a significant advantage in the processing of adaptive memory, illustrating that individuals tend to have superior memory for animate over inanimate stimuli. Despite this, a systematic analysis of the effect remains absent. A quantitative review is needed to assess the stability of the animacy effect, and the reverse animacy effect observed in some studies also requires investigation. Employing a three-level meta-analytic approach, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation and synthesis of the animacy effect's influence on memory processing. Through the integration of 45 primary studies, we conclusively demonstrate the consistent presence of the animacy effect within the context of enhanced memory processing, characterized by a large effect size (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup>= .19, 95% CI [.38, .55]). Our findings indicate that the impact of the animacy effect is robust across variations in study year and geographical location, confirming its stability across diverse cultural and temporal frameworks. Importantly, our analysis revealed that the animacy effect was moderated by the type of memory task. Specifically, the animacy effect was stronger in free recall compared to recognition and cued recall, with the latter two showing a less consistent animacy effect. This insight underscores the necessity of considering the memory task type in research on the animacy effect, particularly in experimental designs investigating the underlying mechanisms of its influence. In sum, although the magnitude of the animacy effect may vary across memory tasks, it represents a stable memory advantage shaped by evolutionary pressures. Continued research is needed to uncover its cognitive underpinnings and to translate these findings into practical domains such as education and marketing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20763,"journal":{"name":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychonomic Bulletin & Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-025-02737-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, the animacy effect has emerged as a significant advantage in the processing of adaptive memory, illustrating that individuals tend to have superior memory for animate over inanimate stimuli. Despite this, a systematic analysis of the effect remains absent. A quantitative review is needed to assess the stability of the animacy effect, and the reverse animacy effect observed in some studies also requires investigation. Employing a three-level meta-analytic approach, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation and synthesis of the animacy effect's influence on memory processing. Through the integration of 45 primary studies, we conclusively demonstrate the consistent presence of the animacy effect within the context of enhanced memory processing, characterized by a large effect size (ηp2= .19, 95% CI [.38, .55]). Our findings indicate that the impact of the animacy effect is robust across variations in study year and geographical location, confirming its stability across diverse cultural and temporal frameworks. Importantly, our analysis revealed that the animacy effect was moderated by the type of memory task. Specifically, the animacy effect was stronger in free recall compared to recognition and cued recall, with the latter two showing a less consistent animacy effect. This insight underscores the necessity of considering the memory task type in research on the animacy effect, particularly in experimental designs investigating the underlying mechanisms of its influence. In sum, although the magnitude of the animacy effect may vary across memory tasks, it represents a stable memory advantage shaped by evolutionary pressures. Continued research is needed to uncover its cognitive underpinnings and to translate these findings into practical domains such as education and marketing.

助记优势中的动画效应:一个三层次的元分析。
在过去的十年中,动画效应已经成为适应性记忆处理中的一个显著优势,表明个体对动画刺激的记忆优于非动画刺激。尽管如此,对其影响的系统分析仍然缺乏。对活性效应的稳定性需要进行定量评价,对一些研究中观察到的反向活性效应也需要进行调查。本研究采用三层次元分析方法,对动画效应对记忆加工的影响进行了综合评价。通过整合45项初步研究,我们最终证明了在增强记忆加工的背景下,动画效应的存在是一致的,其特点是具有较大的效应量(ηp2= 0.19, 95% CI)。38岁,55])。我们的研究结果表明,活力效应的影响在学习年份和地理位置的变化中是强大的,证实了它在不同文化和时间框架中的稳定性。重要的是,我们的分析显示,动画效应被记忆任务的类型所缓和。具体来说,与识别和线索回忆相比,自由回忆中的动画效应更强,后两者的动画效应不太一致。这一发现强调了在研究动画效应时考虑记忆任务类型的必要性,特别是在研究其影响的潜在机制的实验设计中。总之,尽管在不同的记忆任务中,动画效应的大小可能有所不同,但它代表了一种由进化压力形成的稳定的记忆优势。需要继续研究以揭示其认知基础,并将这些发现转化为教育和营销等实际领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: The journal provides coverage spanning a broad spectrum of topics in all areas of experimental psychology. The journal is primarily dedicated to the publication of theory and review articles and brief reports of outstanding experimental work. Areas of coverage include cognitive psychology broadly construed, including but not limited to action, perception, & attention, language, learning & memory, reasoning & decision making, and social cognition. We welcome submissions that approach these issues from a variety of perspectives such as behavioral measurements, comparative psychology, development, evolutionary psychology, genetics, neuroscience, and quantitative/computational modeling. We particularly encourage integrative research that crosses traditional content and methodological boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信