Comparative analysis of magnesium sulfate and atosiban in fetal neuroprotection during high-risk pregnancies.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lijuan Pan, Ning Zhang
{"title":"Comparative analysis of magnesium sulfate and atosiban in fetal neuroprotection during high-risk pregnancies.","authors":"Lijuan Pan, Ning Zhang","doi":"10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.14018.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preterm births could increase the risk of neonatal conditions like cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental delays. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of magnesium sulfate and atosiban in providing neuroprotection to preterm infants. A clinical trial was conducted between 2020 and 2024, involving 102 high-risk pregnant women at multiple tertiary clinics in China. We studied the neonatal neurodevelopmental delay at 6 months and 12 months whilst also focusing on factors such as maternal side effects, gestational age, mode of delivery, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission rates. Unlike magnesium sulfate, Atosiban could reduce the fetus' breathing problems that can, in turn, lead to baby brain protection. It also has fewer maternal side effects, such as nausea and hypertension (p = 0.03). Magnesium sulfate had comparably higher risks of maternal and fetal complications, 49.02% and 68.63% respectively. This study's results suggest that while atosiban is not a commonly used intervention, it is a promising agent for fetal neuroprotection. It is also observed that considering maternal safety, it has fewer side effects. Future larger population studies should be carried out to corroborate the results for higher efficient and safer intervention for fetal neuroprotection.</p>","PeriodicalId":19971,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"38 5","pages":"1685-1693"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.14018.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preterm births could increase the risk of neonatal conditions like cerebral palsy and neurodevelopmental delays. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of magnesium sulfate and atosiban in providing neuroprotection to preterm infants. A clinical trial was conducted between 2020 and 2024, involving 102 high-risk pregnant women at multiple tertiary clinics in China. We studied the neonatal neurodevelopmental delay at 6 months and 12 months whilst also focusing on factors such as maternal side effects, gestational age, mode of delivery, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission rates. Unlike magnesium sulfate, Atosiban could reduce the fetus' breathing problems that can, in turn, lead to baby brain protection. It also has fewer maternal side effects, such as nausea and hypertension (p = 0.03). Magnesium sulfate had comparably higher risks of maternal and fetal complications, 49.02% and 68.63% respectively. This study's results suggest that while atosiban is not a commonly used intervention, it is a promising agent for fetal neuroprotection. It is also observed that considering maternal safety, it has fewer side effects. Future larger population studies should be carried out to corroborate the results for higher efficient and safer intervention for fetal neuroprotection.

硫酸镁与阿托西班对高危妊娠胎儿神经保护作用的比较分析。
早产可能会增加新生儿患脑瘫和神经发育迟缓等疾病的风险。本试验旨在评价硫酸镁和阿托西班对早产儿提供神经保护的疗效。一项临床试验于2020年至2024年在中国多家三级诊所进行,涉及102名高危孕妇。我们研究了新生儿6个月和12个月时的神经发育迟缓,同时也关注了产妇副作用、胎龄、分娩方式和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院率等因素。与硫酸镁不同,阿托西班可以减少胎儿的呼吸问题,从而保护婴儿的大脑。它也有更少的产妇副作用,如恶心和高血压(p = 0.03)。硫酸镁对母胎并发症的发生率较高,分别为49.02%和68.63%。这项研究结果表明,虽然阿托西班不是一种常用的干预措施,但它是一种有希望的胎儿神经保护剂。此外,考虑到产妇的安全,它的副作用更小。未来应该进行更大规模的人群研究,以证实更有效和更安全的胎儿神经保护干预的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (PJPS) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical sciences journal. The PJPS had its origin in 1988 from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi as a biannual journal, frequency converted as quarterly in 2005, and now PJPS is being published as bi-monthly from January 2013. PJPS covers Biological, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research (Drug Delivery, Pharmacy Management, Molecular Biology, Biochemical, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Phytochemical, Bio-analytical, Therapeutics, Biotechnology and research on nano particles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信