Diverse paths of phenotypic evolution in functional movement disorders: A longitudinal perspective.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daniel S Marín-Medina, Gala Lopez, Malco Rossi, Marcelo Merello
{"title":"Diverse paths of phenotypic evolution in functional movement disorders: A longitudinal perspective.","authors":"Daniel S Marín-Medina, Gala Lopez, Malco Rossi, Marcelo Merello","doi":"10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.108059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Functional Movement Disorders (FMD) exhibit a variable course over time. Understanding FMD phenotype trajectories may improve knowledge of its natural history and prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of FMD patients seen at a tertiary movement disorders clinic (2011-2024). Motor symptoms before the first consultation T(-1), FMD phenotype at first consultation T(0), and FMD phenotype at last consultation T(1), were considered. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients who modified the phenotype from T(0)→T(1) versus those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 112 patients (81.2 % female, mean age at onset 46.0 ± 18.8 years), the most common FMD phenotypes were mixed, tremor, and dystonia, with a median time from onset to T(0) of 15 (8-48) months, and follow-up of 21.7 (7.9-54.8) months. Motor symptoms at T(-1) were mainly tremor and gait disorders. One-third of patients had changed the motor symptoms from T(-1)→T(0), mostly to mixed forms. From T(0)→T(1), 13.2 % of patients displayed a change in the phenotype, mainly from dystonia, tremor, and parkinsonism to mixed FMD. Family dysfunction, variability within the same phenotype, change in location, and worse patient-reported status were more frequent in patients with phenotype modification. Logistic multivariable analysis showed that functional dystonia at T(0), adjusted for within-phenotype movement variability, predicted phenotype modification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FMD patients often showed changes in phenotype over time, tending toward more mixed forms. Certain clinical features may help predict these changes, emphasizing the importance of continued follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":19970,"journal":{"name":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","volume":" ","pages":"108059"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.108059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Functional Movement Disorders (FMD) exhibit a variable course over time. Understanding FMD phenotype trajectories may improve knowledge of its natural history and prognosis.

Methods: Retrospective study of FMD patients seen at a tertiary movement disorders clinic (2011-2024). Motor symptoms before the first consultation T(-1), FMD phenotype at first consultation T(0), and FMD phenotype at last consultation T(1), were considered. We compared the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients who modified the phenotype from T(0)→T(1) versus those who did not.

Results: Among 112 patients (81.2 % female, mean age at onset 46.0 ± 18.8 years), the most common FMD phenotypes were mixed, tremor, and dystonia, with a median time from onset to T(0) of 15 (8-48) months, and follow-up of 21.7 (7.9-54.8) months. Motor symptoms at T(-1) were mainly tremor and gait disorders. One-third of patients had changed the motor symptoms from T(-1)→T(0), mostly to mixed forms. From T(0)→T(1), 13.2 % of patients displayed a change in the phenotype, mainly from dystonia, tremor, and parkinsonism to mixed FMD. Family dysfunction, variability within the same phenotype, change in location, and worse patient-reported status were more frequent in patients with phenotype modification. Logistic multivariable analysis showed that functional dystonia at T(0), adjusted for within-phenotype movement variability, predicted phenotype modification.

Conclusions: FMD patients often showed changes in phenotype over time, tending toward more mixed forms. Certain clinical features may help predict these changes, emphasizing the importance of continued follow-up.

功能性运动障碍的不同表型进化途径:纵向视角。
简介:功能性运动障碍(FMD)表现出随时间变化的病程。了解口蹄疫表型轨迹可以提高对其自然历史和预后的认识。方法:对2011-2024年在某三级运动障碍门诊就诊的口蹄疫患者进行回顾性研究。考虑首次会诊前运动症状T(-1)、首次会诊时口蹄疫表型T(0)和最后一次会诊时口蹄疫表型T(1)。我们比较了从T(0)→T(1)改变表型的患者与没有改变表型的患者的临床和人口学特征。结果:112例患者中,女性占81.2%,平均发病年龄46.0±18.8岁,最常见的FMD表型为混合型、震颤型和肌张力障碍型,从发病到T(0)的中位时间为15(8-48)个月,随访时间为21.7(7.9-54.8)个月。T(-1)时的运动症状主要为震颤和步态障碍。三分之一的患者运动症状由T(-1)→T(0),多为混合型。从T(0)→T(1), 13.2%的患者表现出表型变化,主要从肌张力障碍、震颤、帕金森症到混合型FMD。在表型改变的患者中,家庭功能障碍、同一表型内的变异性、位置的改变以及患者报告的较差状态更为常见。Logistic多变量分析显示,T(0)时的功能性肌张力障碍,根据表型内运动变异性进行调整,预测表型改变。结论:口蹄疫患者经常表现出表型随时间的变化,倾向于更混合的形式。某些临床特征可能有助于预测这些变化,强调持续随访的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parkinsonism & related disorders
Parkinsonism & related disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
292
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders publishes the results of basic and clinical research contributing to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of all neurodegenerative syndromes in which Parkinsonism, Essential Tremor or related movement disorders may be a feature. Regular features will include: Review Articles, Point of View articles, Full-length Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports and Letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信