Application value of dexmedetomidine and midazolam combined with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block anesthesia in patients with humeral fractures.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Dongjing Huo, CaiZhi Zhang, Lijie Li, Rong Zeng
{"title":"Application value of dexmedetomidine and midazolam combined with ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block anesthesia in patients with humeral fractures.","authors":"Dongjing Huo, CaiZhi Zhang, Lijie Li, Rong Zeng","doi":"10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.14098.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients undergoing humeral fracture surgery. Patients who underwent humeral fracture surgery in our hospital from July 2015 to December 2023 were retrospectively selected. Among the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve block anesthesia protocol, 71 cases used midazolam and were included in Group A, 83 cases used dexmedetomidine and were included in Group B. The fluctuations of heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group B were smaller than those in Group A. The onset time of sensory and motor block in Group B was shorter than that, while the maintenance time of sensory and motor block was longer. The sedative effect was higher (0.5 hours) after the start of the operation and at the end of the operation in Group B. The pain degree of Group B at 2, 8 and 12 hours after the operation was lower. The cognitive functions in Group B were higher at 30 minutes and 24 hours after the operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Dexmedetomidine can be given priority as an anesthetic drug for humeral fracture surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19971,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"38 5","pages":"1804-1812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.14098.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in patients undergoing humeral fracture surgery. Patients who underwent humeral fracture surgery in our hospital from July 2015 to December 2023 were retrospectively selected. Among the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve block anesthesia protocol, 71 cases used midazolam and were included in Group A, 83 cases used dexmedetomidine and were included in Group B. The fluctuations of heart rate and mean arterial pressure in Group B were smaller than those in Group A. The onset time of sensory and motor block in Group B was shorter than that, while the maintenance time of sensory and motor block was longer. The sedative effect was higher (0.5 hours) after the start of the operation and at the end of the operation in Group B. The pain degree of Group B at 2, 8 and 12 hours after the operation was lower. The cognitive functions in Group B were higher at 30 minutes and 24 hours after the operation. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Dexmedetomidine can be given priority as an anesthetic drug for humeral fracture surgery.

右美托咪定、咪达唑仑联合超声引导下臂丛阻滞麻醉在肱骨骨折中的应用价值。
本研究旨在比较右美托咪定与咪达唑仑在肱骨骨折手术患者中的疗效和安全性。回顾性选择2015年7月至2023年12月在我院行肱骨骨折手术的患者。超声引导下的臂丛神经阻滞麻醉方案中,使用咪达唑仑71例纳入A组,使用右美托咪定83例纳入B组。B组心率和平均动脉压波动均小于A组,B组感觉运动阻滞发作时间短于A组,维持时间长于A组。B组在手术开始后和手术结束后(0.5 h)镇静效果较高,B组在术后2、8、12 h疼痛程度较低。B组患者在术后30分钟和24小时的认知功能明显高于对照组。两组患者不良反应发生率无显著差异。右美托咪定可优先作为肱骨骨折手术的麻醉药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (PJPS) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical sciences journal. The PJPS had its origin in 1988 from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi as a biannual journal, frequency converted as quarterly in 2005, and now PJPS is being published as bi-monthly from January 2013. PJPS covers Biological, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research (Drug Delivery, Pharmacy Management, Molecular Biology, Biochemical, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Phytochemical, Bio-analytical, Therapeutics, Biotechnology and research on nano particles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信