Realist review protocol for understanding young people's experiences of engaging with police-mental health practitioner collaboration in emergency responses to mental health crises.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sarah Parry, Lucy Oakes, Zarah Eve, Stephen Edwards, Fiona Lobban, Prathiba Chitsabesan, Geoff Wong
{"title":"Realist review protocol for understanding young people's experiences of engaging with police-mental health practitioner collaboration in emergency responses to mental health crises.","authors":"Sarah Parry, Lucy Oakes, Zarah Eve, Stephen Edwards, Fiona Lobban, Prathiba Chitsabesan, Geoff Wong","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02882-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children and young people are facing increasing mental health challenges. Access to emergency mental health care for young people is under-researched and poorly understood. Police data indicates a rise in youth mental health emergency calls, but officers often feel unprepared to support young people in crisis. Mental health practitioners have the experience and training to provide helpful support to young people in crisis, although the availability of mental health services for young people can be limited during evenings and weekends, especially in rural areas. We know that children and young people can benefit when police and mental health services work together. However, we need to better understand the full range of impacts of joint responses for young people and their families and how these impacts are generated. Joint emergency response is a complex intervention, and a realist synthesis was chosen as it can make sense of such interventions. Therefore, this realist synthesis aims to develop a programme theory of the underlying generative mechanisms by which, and contexts within which, emergency responders collaborate and co-respond to support young people experiencing a mental health crisis.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will follow five steps to undertake the realist review: (1) Define the review scope, (2) develop initial programme theories, (3) conduct an evidence search, (4) select and appraise evidence, and (5) extract and synthesise data. Embase, CINAHL, Social Policy and Practice, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and AMED databases will be searched up to June 2024, supplementing searches with citation tracking, grey literature, relevant NHS England guidance, and practitioner interpretation workshops. Data selection will be based on relevance and richness. Data will be extracted and synthesised iteratively, and causal links between contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes will be illuminated in the process. The results will be conducted and reported according to the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) quality and publication standards.</p><p><strong>Collaboration and dissemination: </strong>Findings will be disseminated to the research community through conference presentations and a peer-reviewed journal article. We will work with healthcare and police organisations, as well as professional and expert-by-experience stakeholder groups, including commissioners, to develop a strategy for far-reaching dissemination with impact to share findings across a range of audiences.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will develop a programme theory regarding how emergency responders collaborate to support young people experiencing mental health crises. Findings will inform future practices, aiming to improve collaborative responses and outcomes across youth contexts.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024542081.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12462277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02882-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children and young people are facing increasing mental health challenges. Access to emergency mental health care for young people is under-researched and poorly understood. Police data indicates a rise in youth mental health emergency calls, but officers often feel unprepared to support young people in crisis. Mental health practitioners have the experience and training to provide helpful support to young people in crisis, although the availability of mental health services for young people can be limited during evenings and weekends, especially in rural areas. We know that children and young people can benefit when police and mental health services work together. However, we need to better understand the full range of impacts of joint responses for young people and their families and how these impacts are generated. Joint emergency response is a complex intervention, and a realist synthesis was chosen as it can make sense of such interventions. Therefore, this realist synthesis aims to develop a programme theory of the underlying generative mechanisms by which, and contexts within which, emergency responders collaborate and co-respond to support young people experiencing a mental health crisis.

Methods and analysis: We will follow five steps to undertake the realist review: (1) Define the review scope, (2) develop initial programme theories, (3) conduct an evidence search, (4) select and appraise evidence, and (5) extract and synthesise data. Embase, CINAHL, Social Policy and Practice, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and AMED databases will be searched up to June 2024, supplementing searches with citation tracking, grey literature, relevant NHS England guidance, and practitioner interpretation workshops. Data selection will be based on relevance and richness. Data will be extracted and synthesised iteratively, and causal links between contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes will be illuminated in the process. The results will be conducted and reported according to the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) quality and publication standards.

Collaboration and dissemination: Findings will be disseminated to the research community through conference presentations and a peer-reviewed journal article. We will work with healthcare and police organisations, as well as professional and expert-by-experience stakeholder groups, including commissioners, to develop a strategy for far-reaching dissemination with impact to share findings across a range of audiences.

Discussion: This study will develop a programme theory regarding how emergency responders collaborate to support young people experiencing mental health crises. Findings will inform future practices, aiming to improve collaborative responses and outcomes across youth contexts.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024542081.

Abstract Image

现实主义审查协议,以了解年轻人参与警察-精神卫生从业人员合作对精神卫生危机的紧急反应的经验。
背景:儿童和青少年正面临越来越多的心理健康挑战。对年轻人获得紧急精神卫生保健的研究不足,了解不足。警方的数据显示,青少年心理健康紧急呼叫有所增加,但警官们往往感到没有准备好支持处于危机中的年轻人。心理健康从业人员有经验,也受过培训,可以为处于危机中的年轻人提供有益的支持,尽管在晚上和周末,特别是在农村地区,为年轻人提供的心理健康服务可能有限。我们知道,当警察和精神卫生服务机构合作时,儿童和年轻人可以受益。然而,我们需要更好地了解联合应对措施对年轻人及其家庭的全面影响,以及这些影响是如何产生的。联合应急响应是一项复杂的干预措施,选择现实主义综合措施是因为它可以使此类干预措施有意义。因此,这种现实主义综合的目的是发展一种潜在的生成机制的方案理论,在这种机制和背景下,应急人员协作和共同应对,以支持经历心理健康危机的年轻人。方法和分析:我们将遵循五个步骤进行现实主义审查:(1)确定审查范围,(2)发展初始计划理论,(3)进行证据搜索,(4)选择和评估证据,(5)提取和综合数据。Embase, CINAHL,社会政策与实践,MEDLINE, PsycINFO和AMED数据库将被搜索到2024年6月,补充搜索引文跟踪,灰色文献,相关NHS英格兰指南和从业者解释研讨会。数据选择将基于相关性和丰富性。数据将被迭代地提取和合成,并在此过程中阐明背景、机制和结果之间的因果关系。研究结果将根据现实主义和元叙事证据综合:不断发展的标准(RAMESES)质量和出版标准进行和报告。合作和传播:研究结果将通过会议报告和同行评议的期刊文章传播给研究界。我们将与卫生保健和警察组织以及包括专员在内的专业和有经验的专家利益相关者团体合作,制定一项具有深远影响的传播战略,以便在一系列受众中分享调查结果。讨论:本研究将发展一个关于应急人员如何合作支持经历心理健康危机的年轻人的规划理论。研究结果将为未来的实践提供信息,旨在改善青年背景下的协作反应和结果。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024542081。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信