Effect of Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Universal Resin Composites.

IF 2.2 4区医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Operative dentistry Pub Date : 2025-09-23 DOI:10.2341/24-183-L

G A Maghaireh, H Alzraikat, R Hameed

{"title":"Effect of Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Universal Resin Composites.","authors":"G A Maghaireh, H Alzraikat, R Hameed","doi":"10.2341/24-183-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: Polishing of resin composites ensures optimal esthetics and longevity. Effective polishing techniques for conventional multi-shade resin composites are well documented. However, less is known regarding acceptable polishing for newer single-shade universal resin composites.Objective: This study compared the surface roughness of five universal resin composites (Omnichroma, Neo Spectra, Charisma Diamond One, One Shade) and one conventional multi-shade resin composite (Palfique Asteria) following the use of three polishing systems (one-step, Enhance PoGo; two-step, EVE Diacomp Plus Twist; three-step, Sof-Lex) and Mylar strip (without polishing).Methods: A total of 240 specimens were prepared (n=40 for each resin composite). The specimens were grouped into four subgroups (n=10) based on the polishing system applied. The surface roughness of all specimens was evaluated using a non-contact three-dimensional optical profilometer. One randomly selected specimen from each subgroup underwent scanning electron microscope examination.Results: Surface roughness was significantly affected by the resin composite type and the polishing system used (p<0.05). The study groups were ranked by surface roughness, from lowest to highest, across all tested materials as follows: Mylar strip < Enhance PoGo < Sof-Lex < EVE Diacomp. The surface roughness values of the universal resin composites were comparable to the multi-shade nanofilled resin composite in all polishing systems.","PeriodicalId":19502,"journal":{"name":"Operative dentistry","volume":"50 4","pages":"431-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2341/24-183-L","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Polishing of resin composites ensures optimal esthetics and longevity. Effective polishing techniques for conventional multi-shade resin composites are well documented. However, less is known regarding acceptable polishing for newer single-shade universal resin composites.

Objective: This study compared the surface roughness of five universal resin composites (Omnichroma, Neo Spectra, Charisma Diamond One, One Shade) and one conventional multi-shade resin composite (Palfique Asteria) following the use of three polishing systems (one-step, Enhance PoGo; two-step, EVE Diacomp Plus Twist; three-step, Sof-Lex) and Mylar strip (without polishing).

Methods: A total of 240 specimens were prepared (n=40 for each resin composite). The specimens were grouped into four subgroups (n=10) based on the polishing system applied. The surface roughness of all specimens was evaluated using a non-contact three-dimensional optical profilometer. One randomly selected specimen from each subgroup underwent scanning electron microscope examination.

Results: Surface roughness was significantly affected by the resin composite type and the polishing system used (p<0.05). The study groups were ranked by surface roughness, from lowest to highest, across all tested materials as follows: Mylar strip < Enhance PoGo < Sof-Lex < EVE Diacomp. The surface roughness values of the universal resin composites were comparable to the multi-shade nanofilled resin composite in all polishing systems.

查看原文本刊更多论文

抛光系统对通用树脂复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。

原理：树脂复合材料抛光确保最佳的美学和寿命。有效的抛光技术，传统的多色树脂复合材料是有据可查。然而，对较新的单色通用树脂复合材料的可接受抛光知之甚少。目的：本研究比较了五种通用树脂复合材料（Omnichroma, Neo Spectra, Charisma Diamond One, One Shade）和一种常规多色树脂复合材料（Palfique Asteria）在使用三种抛光系统（一步，Enhance PoGo；两步，EVE Diacomp Plus Twist；三步，soflex）和Mylar条（不抛光）后的表面粗糙度。方法：共制备240例标本（每种树脂复合材料各40例）。根据所使用的抛光系统，将样品分为四组（n=10）。使用非接触式三维光学轮廓仪评估所有样品的表面粗糙度。每个亚组随机抽取1个标本进行扫描电镜检查。结果：树脂复合类型和抛光系统对表面粗糙度有显著影响(p

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Operative dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

4.00

自引率

9.10%

发文量

124

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Operative Dentistry is a refereed, international journal published bi-monthly and distributed to subscribers in over 50 countries. In 2012, we printed 84 articles (672 pages). Papers were submitted by authors from 45 countries, in the categories of Clinical Research, Laboratory Research, Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations and Invited Papers, as well as Editorials and Abstracts. One of the strong points of our journal is that our current publication time for accepted manuscripts is 4 to 6 months from the date of submission. Clinical Techniques/Case Presentations have a very quick turnaround time, which allows for very rapid publication of clinical based concepts. We also provide color for those papers that would benefit from its use. The journal does not accept any advertising but you will find postings for faculty positions. Additionally, the journal also does not rent, sell or otherwise allow its subscriber list to be used by any other entity