Neoadjuvant PD-1 and LAG-3-targeting bispecific antibody and other immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 1b/2 Morpheus-Melanoma trial.

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Georgina V Long, Nitya Nair, Daniel Marbach, Richard A Scolyer, Sabine Wilson, Denise Cotting, Nicolas Staedler, Rodabe N Amaria, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Ahmad A Tarhini, Caroline Robert, Omid Hamid, Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste, Celeste Lebbe, Eva Munoz-Couselo, Alexander M Menzies, Cecile Pages, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mario Mandala, Nikki Jessop, Uwe Bader, Maurizio Perdicchio, Volker Teichgräber, Merlind Muecke, Christoph Markert, Christian Blank
{"title":"Neoadjuvant PD-1 and LAG-3-targeting bispecific antibody and other immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations in resectable melanoma: the randomized phase 1b/2 Morpheus-Melanoma trial.","authors":"Georgina V Long, Nitya Nair, Daniel Marbach, Richard A Scolyer, Sabine Wilson, Denise Cotting, Nicolas Staedler, Rodabe N Amaria, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Ahmad A Tarhini, Caroline Robert, Omid Hamid, Caroline Gaudy-Marqueste, Celeste Lebbe, Eva Munoz-Couselo, Alexander M Menzies, Cecile Pages, Giuseppe Curigliano, Mario Mandala, Nikki Jessop, Uwe Bader, Maurizio Perdicchio, Volker Teichgräber, Merlind Muecke, Christoph Markert, Christian Blank","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03967-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with stage III melanoma are at high risk of relapse. The NADINA trial evaluating neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and the SWOG-1801 trial evaluating neoadjuvant pembrolizumab have demonstrated superior clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant checkpoint inhibition. Morpheus-Melanoma was a phase 1b/2, randomized umbrella trial evaluating tobemstomig (anti-PD-1/anti-LAG-3 bispecific antibody; n = 40), tobemstomig plus tiragolumab (anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody; n = 20) and atezolizumab (PD-L1-targeting monoclonal antibody) plus tiragolumab (n = 20) versus nivolumab (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody; n = 22) in stage III melanoma. The primary endpoint was pathological response by independent pathological review. Additional endpoints included safety and exploratory biomarkers. Here tobemstomig showed a similar pathological response rate (pRR) versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (80.0% (32/40) versus 77.3% (17/22)); major pathological responses were less frequent with tobemstomig versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment (62.5% (25/40) versus 72.7% (16/22)). Tobemstomig plus tiragolumab and atezolizumab plus tiragolumab showed a lower pRR versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (60.0% (12/20) and 45.0% (9/20) versus 77.3% (17/22), respectively). Tobemstomig demonstrated improved safety versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with 2.5% (1/40) and 22.7% (5/22) of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively, and 0% (0/40) and 13.6% (3/22) of patients discontinuing treatment due to TRAEs, respectively. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported by 15% (3/20) of patients in the tobemstomig plus tiragolumab arm and by no patients in the atezolizumab plus tiragolumab arm. Baseline CD8<sup>+</sup> and CD3<sup>+</sup> tumor-infiltrating T cell density, IFNγ pathway and effector T cell gene expression, tumor mutational burden and pre-surgery circulating tumor DNA correlated with pathological response across treatments. In conclusion, in the Morpheus-Melanoma study, tobemstomig demonstrated a similar pathological response and improved safety profile versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with resectable stage III melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05116202 .</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03967-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with stage III melanoma are at high risk of relapse. The NADINA trial evaluating neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab and the SWOG-1801 trial evaluating neoadjuvant pembrolizumab have demonstrated superior clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant checkpoint inhibition. Morpheus-Melanoma was a phase 1b/2, randomized umbrella trial evaluating tobemstomig (anti-PD-1/anti-LAG-3 bispecific antibody; n = 40), tobemstomig plus tiragolumab (anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody; n = 20) and atezolizumab (PD-L1-targeting monoclonal antibody) plus tiragolumab (n = 20) versus nivolumab (anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody) plus ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody; n = 22) in stage III melanoma. The primary endpoint was pathological response by independent pathological review. Additional endpoints included safety and exploratory biomarkers. Here tobemstomig showed a similar pathological response rate (pRR) versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (80.0% (32/40) versus 77.3% (17/22)); major pathological responses were less frequent with tobemstomig versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment (62.5% (25/40) versus 72.7% (16/22)). Tobemstomig plus tiragolumab and atezolizumab plus tiragolumab showed a lower pRR versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab (60.0% (12/20) and 45.0% (9/20) versus 77.3% (17/22), respectively). Tobemstomig demonstrated improved safety versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with 2.5% (1/40) and 22.7% (5/22) of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), respectively, and 0% (0/40) and 13.6% (3/22) of patients discontinuing treatment due to TRAEs, respectively. Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were reported by 15% (3/20) of patients in the tobemstomig plus tiragolumab arm and by no patients in the atezolizumab plus tiragolumab arm. Baseline CD8+ and CD3+ tumor-infiltrating T cell density, IFNγ pathway and effector T cell gene expression, tumor mutational burden and pre-surgery circulating tumor DNA correlated with pathological response across treatments. In conclusion, in the Morpheus-Melanoma study, tobemstomig demonstrated a similar pathological response and improved safety profile versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with resectable stage III melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05116202 .

新辅助PD-1和lag -3靶向双特异性抗体和其他免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗可切除黑色素瘤:随机1b/2期睡眠-黑色素瘤试验
III期黑色素瘤患者复发的风险很高。评价新辅助nivolumab + ipilimumab的NADINA试验和评价新辅助pembrolizumab的SWOG-1801试验显示,新辅助检查点抑制优于辅助检查点抑制的临床结果。Morpheus-Melanoma是一项1b/2期随机伞式试验,评估tobemstomig(抗pd -1/抗lag -3双特异性抗体,n = 40)、tobemstomig + tiragolumab(抗tigit单克隆抗体,n = 20)和atezolizumab (pd - l1靶向单克隆抗体)+ tiragolumab (n = 20)与nivolumab(抗pd -1单克隆抗体)+ ipilimumab(抗ctla -4单克隆抗体,n = 22)在III期黑色素瘤中的疗效。主要终点是独立病理检查的病理反应。其他终点包括安全性和探索性生物标志物。在这里,与纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗相比,bemstomig显示出相似的病理反应率(pRR)(80.0%(32/40)对77.3% (17/22));与纳武单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗相比,tobemstomig组的主要病理反应发生率较低(62.5%(25/40)对72.7%(16/22))。Tobemstomig + tiragolumab和atezolizumab + tiragolumab的pRR低于nivolumab + ipilimumab(分别为60.0%(12/20)和45.0%(9/20)和77.3%(17/22))。与纳volumab + ipilimumab相比,Tobemstomig显示出更高的安全性,分别有2.5%(1/40)和22.7%(5/22)的患者经历3级或更高级别的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs), 0%(0/40)和13.6%(3/22)的患者因TRAEs而停止治疗。在tobemstomig + tiragolumab组中,15%(3/20)的患者报告了3级或更高级别的trae,而在atezolizumab + tiragolumab组中,没有患者报告了3级或更高级别的trae。基线CD8+和CD3+肿瘤浸润T细胞密度、IFNγ通路和效应T细胞基因表达、肿瘤突变负担和术前循环肿瘤DNA与治疗期间的病理反应相关。总之,在Morpheus-Melanoma研究中,与nivolumab + ipilimumab相比,tobemstomig在可切除的III期黑色素瘤患者中表现出相似的病理反应和更高的安全性。ClinicalTrials.gov识别码:NCT05116202。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信