Exploring quality improvement processes for psychotropic medication use in Australian residential aged care homes: a qualitative study.

IF 2.5 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2557873
Shakti Shrestha, Amanda J Cross, Michelle Steeper, Nazanin Falconer, Laurie Buys, Carmela Lagasca, Angelita Martini, Dayna Cenin, Nancy Ochieng, Francesca Glamorgan, J Simon Bell, Adam La Caze
{"title":"Exploring quality improvement processes for psychotropic medication use in Australian residential aged care homes: a qualitative study.","authors":"Shakti Shrestha, Amanda J Cross, Michelle Steeper, Nazanin Falconer, Laurie Buys, Carmela Lagasca, Angelita Martini, Dayna Cenin, Nancy Ochieng, Francesca Glamorgan, J Simon Bell, Adam La Caze","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2557873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent regulatory changes in Australia have emphasised system-level approaches to ensure appropriate psychotropic medication use in residential aged care homes. This study explored quality improvement processes related to psychotropic medication use in Australian residential aged care homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study used in-depth semi-structured interviews with a maximum variation sample of key stakeholders involved in psychotropic medication use at organisations operating facilities in metropolitan and regional areas in four Australian states. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using both inductive and deductive approaches by two researchers using a framework developed for learning health systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stakeholders (n = 33) included nurses, occupational therapists, pharmacists, medical practitioners, residents and caregivers. Identified themes were (i) regulation was driving change in organisational policies and procedures, and (ii) aged care organisations were enhancing quality improvement systems for psychotropic medications. Many of the requirements of successful healthcare quality improvement systems were present within the aged care organisations, including alignment of core values and presence of key ethical, legal and policy infrastructure. There are opportunities for better use of clinical data to improve care, especially in terms of learning from the data and implementing tailored change. The challenges identified by participants included navigating the perceived tension between compliance and quality, and aligning the goals and processes of all health professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recent changes in policies, procedures and infrastructure have provided clearer oversight of psychotropic medication use. Individual and system approaches to psychotropic medication use in aged care have shifted. Key opportunities for improving use of psychotropic medications within aged care organisations include improving the capacity to use local data to improve care and building interdisciplinary teams to facilitate collaborative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2557873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12456038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2557873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent regulatory changes in Australia have emphasised system-level approaches to ensure appropriate psychotropic medication use in residential aged care homes. This study explored quality improvement processes related to psychotropic medication use in Australian residential aged care homes.

Methods: This qualitative study used in-depth semi-structured interviews with a maximum variation sample of key stakeholders involved in psychotropic medication use at organisations operating facilities in metropolitan and regional areas in four Australian states. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using both inductive and deductive approaches by two researchers using a framework developed for learning health systems.

Results: Stakeholders (n = 33) included nurses, occupational therapists, pharmacists, medical practitioners, residents and caregivers. Identified themes were (i) regulation was driving change in organisational policies and procedures, and (ii) aged care organisations were enhancing quality improvement systems for psychotropic medications. Many of the requirements of successful healthcare quality improvement systems were present within the aged care organisations, including alignment of core values and presence of key ethical, legal and policy infrastructure. There are opportunities for better use of clinical data to improve care, especially in terms of learning from the data and implementing tailored change. The challenges identified by participants included navigating the perceived tension between compliance and quality, and aligning the goals and processes of all health professionals.

Conclusions: Recent changes in policies, procedures and infrastructure have provided clearer oversight of psychotropic medication use. Individual and system approaches to psychotropic medication use in aged care have shifted. Key opportunities for improving use of psychotropic medications within aged care organisations include improving the capacity to use local data to improve care and building interdisciplinary teams to facilitate collaborative care.

探索质量改进过程的精神药物使用在澳大利亚住宅老年护理之家:一项定性研究。
背景:澳大利亚最近的监管变化强调了系统层面的方法,以确保适当的精神药物使用在住宅老年护理之家。本研究探讨澳洲养老院精神药物使用的品质改善过程。方法:本定性研究采用深度半结构化访谈,在澳大利亚四个州的大都市和区域地区的组织运营设施中涉及精神药物使用的主要利益相关者的最大变异样本。两位研究人员使用为学习卫生系统开发的框架,逐字记录访谈内容,并使用归纳和演绎方法进行主题分析。结果:利益相关者(n = 33)包括护士、职业治疗师、药剂师、医生、住院医师和护理人员。确定的主题是(i)监管正在推动组织政策和程序的变化,以及(ii)老年护理组织正在加强精神药物的质量改进系统。成功的医疗保健质量改进系统的许多要求都存在于老年护理组织中,包括核心价值观的一致性和关键道德、法律和政策基础设施的存在。有机会更好地利用临床数据来改善护理,特别是在从数据中学习和实施量身定制的变革方面。与会者确定的挑战包括处理合规性与质量之间的紧张关系,以及协调所有卫生专业人员的目标和流程。结论:最近政策、程序和基础设施的变化为精神药物的使用提供了更清晰的监督。在老年护理中使用精神药物的个人和系统方法已经发生了变化。在老年护理机构中,改善精神药物使用的关键机会包括提高使用本地数据来改善护理的能力,以及建立跨学科团队来促进协作护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信